Journals / Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

A Research on the Determining Effects of Perceived Organizational Justice to Organizational Sabotage

Algılanan Örgütsel Adaletin Örgütsel Sabotaja Etkilerinin Tespitine Yönelik Bir Araştırma

Pages
252–263
Publication Date
2019-04-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of regression analysis performed, it was determined that the effect of perceived organizational justice on organizational sabotage (R2=,402)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sabotage behaviors in organizations are negative behaviors of employees who prevent from achieving organization's goals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, questionnaire was formed using ‘Perceived Organizational Justice Scale’ developed by Niehoff and Moorman (1993) and the ‘Perceived Organizational Sabotage Scale’ developed by Altıntaş (2009).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of regression analysis performed, it was determined that the effect of perceived organizational justice on organizational sabotage (R2=,402)
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Adalet · Algılanan Örgütsel Adalet · Sabotaj

Abstract

Sabotage behaviors in organizations are negative behaviors of employees who prevent from achieving organization's goals. This behavior aims to harm the members and material resources of organization. Organizational justice explains to perceptions of employees about practices of organization. The aim of this study is to determine whether the perceived organizational justice has effect on organizational sabotage behavior. For this purpose, questionnaire was formed using ‘Perceived Organizational Justice Scale’ developed by Niehoff and Moorman (1993) and the ‘Perceived Organizational Sabotage Scale’ developed by Altıntaş (2009). With the prepared form, data were collected from 432 blue-collar employees working in Niğde. The collected data were subjected to frequency, reliability, correlation and regression analysis. As a result of regression analysis performed, it was determined that the effect of perceived organizational justice on organizational sabotage (R2=,402)

Özet

Örgütlerde sabotaj davranışları çalışanların örgütlerin amaçlarına ulaşmasına engel olan olumsuz davranışlardır. Bu davranış örgütün üyelerine ve maddi kaynaklarına zarar vermeyi amaçlamaktadır. Örgütsel adalet ise çalışanların örgütün uygulamalarına ilişkin adalet algılamalarını ifade etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, algılanan örgütsel adaletin örgütsel sabotaj davranışı üzerinde etkisi olup olmadığını tespit etmektir. Bu amaçtan hareketle Niehoff ve Moorman (1993) tarafından geliştirilmiş olan “Algılanan Örgütsel Adalet Ölçeği” ve “Altıntaş (2009) tarafından geliştirilmiş olan “Algılanan Örgütsel Sabotaj Ölçeği” kullanılarak anket formu oluşturulmuştur. Hazırlanan form ile Niğde’de istihdam edilmiş 432 mavi yakalı çalışandan veri toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler frekans, güvenilirlik, korelasyon ve regresyon analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Yapılan regresyon analizi sonucunda algılanan örgütsel adaletin örgütsel sabotaj üzerinde etkisi (R2=,402) olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇIN, İ., BAYRAM, A., AKÇA, C. (2019). A Research on the Determining Effects of Perceived Organizational Justice to Organizational Sabotage. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 252–263. https://ajindex.com/articles/156009

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press. 2, 267–299.
  2. Allen, V. L. ve Greenberger, D. B. (1980). Destruction And Perceived Control. In A. Braun, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Advances in Environmental Psychology. New York: Academic Press. 2, 85–109.Altıntaş, F. Ç. (2009). Kişiliğin algılanan örgütsel sabotaj davranışları üzerine etkisi. HÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 95-111.Ambrose, M. L., Seabright, M. A. ve Schminke, M. (2002). Sabotage in the Workplace: The Role of Organizational Injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 947–965.
  3. Analoui, F. (1995). Workplace sabotage: its styles, motives, and management. Journal of Management Development, 14, 48–65.Bensman, J. ve Gerver, I. (1963). Crime And Punishment in The Factory: The Function Of Deviancy in Maintaining The Social System. American Sociological Review, 28, 588–598.
  4. Bies, R. J. ve Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on Negotiations in Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 1, 43–55.Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L. ve Cummings, L. L. (1988). Causal Accounts and Managing Organizational Conflict: It is Enough To Say İt's Not My Fault? Communication Research,Brown, R. ve Herrnstein, R. J. (1975). Psychology. Boston: Little, Brown. 762.Byrne, Z.S. ve R. Cropanzano (2001). “The History of Organizational Justice: The Founders Speak”, R. Cropanzano (eds.), Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Mahwah, NJ. Erlbaum, 2, 3-26.Chen, P. Y. ve Spector, P. E. (1992). Relationships of Work Stressors With Aggression, Withdrawal, Theft And Substance Use: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 177–184.Cohen-Charash, Y. ve Spector, P. E. (2001). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–324.Crino, M. D. (1994). Employee Sabotage: A Random or Preventable Phenomenon? Journal of Managerial Issues, 6, 311–330.Crino, M. D. ve Leap, T. L. (1989). What HR Managers Must Know About Employee Sabotage. Personnel, 66(5), 31–38.Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., ve Gilliland, S. W. (2007), “The Management of Organizational Justice”, Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 34-48.Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., ve Rupp, D. R. (2001).
  5. Moral Virtues, F