SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Akademik Yayınlar Dergisi (TAY Journal) / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

The Effect of Differentiated Mathematics Homework on 4th Grade Primary Students’ Attitudes Towards Homework

İlkokul 4. Sınıfta Farklılaştırılmış Matematik Ev Ödevlerinin Öğrencilerin Ödeve Yönelik Tutumlarına Etkisi

Nilay Ceylan Dalmaz0000-0001-7346-0903
Neşe Işık Tertemiz(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7033-7192
Pages
1–34
Publication Date
2025-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within the scope of the research, changes in students’ attitudes and experiences towards homework in the transition from primary to secondary school can also be analysed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the current study is to examine the effects of homework designed with a differentiated method and traditional homework on the attitudes of 4th grade primary school students towards homework in mathematics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consists of 25 experimental and 26 control group students continuing their education in the 4th grade at a state primary school in Kayseri province in the 2023-2024 school year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within the scope of the research, changes in students’ attitudes and experiences towards homework in the transition from primary to secondary school can also be analysed.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2023-2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Farklılaştırılmış matematik ödevi · ilkokul matematik eğitimi · farklılaştırılmış ev ödevi

Abstract

The purpose of the current study is to examine the effects of homework designed with a differentiated method and traditional homework on the attitudes of 4th grade primary school students towards homework in mathematics. A quasi-experimental design with a pre-test-post-test control group, one of the quantitative research methods, was used in the study. The study group consists of 25 experimental and 26 control group students continuing their education in the 4th grade at a state primary school in Kayseri province in the 2023-2024 school year. In the study, the “Attitude Scale towards Mathematics Homework” developed by Bora (2018) and a “Semi-Structured Interview Form” were used as data collection tools. Differentiated homework designed by the researcher was given to the experimental group, and traditional homework was given to the control group for 10 weeks. At the end of the study, a significant difference was found in the post-test results of the experimental and control group students in favour of the experimental group. In addition, it was determined that there was a significant difference between the within-groups post-test scores for both the control and experimental group students and this difference was higher in the experimental group. The findings obtained from the interviews also supported the quantitative findings. Within the scope of the research, changes in students’ attitudes and experiences towards homework in the transition from primary to secondary school can also be analysed.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı matematik dersinde farklılaştırılmış yöntem ile tasarlanan ev ödevleri ile geleneksel ev ödevlerinin, ilkokul 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik dersi ev ödevlerine yönelik tutumlarına etkisini incelemektir. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ön test-son test kontrol gruplu yarı deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. Çalışma grubu 2023-2024 eğitim öğretim yılında Kayseri ilinde yer alan bir devlet ilkokulunda 4. sınıfta öğrenim sürecine devam eden 25 deney, 26 kontrol grubu öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak Bora (2018) tarafından geliştirilen “Matematik Dersine Yönelik Ödev Tutum Ölçeği” ile “Yarı Yapılandırılmış Görüşme” uygulanmıştır. Deney grubuna araştırmacının tasarladığı farklılaştırılmış ev ödevleri, kontrol grubuna ise geleneksel ev ödevleri 10 hafta boyunca verilmiştir. Çalışma sonunda deney ve kontrol grubu öğrencilerinin son test sonuçlarında deney grubu lehine anlamlı fark bulunmuştur. Ayrıca hem deney hem de kontrol grubunun grup içi ön test-son test karşılaştırmalarında son test lehine anlamlı fark olduğu, bu farkın deney grubunda daha yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Öğrencilerin ödeve yönelik duygu ifadeleri, nicel bulguları destekler nitelikte olduğu belirlenmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında öğrencilerin ilkokuldan ortaokula geçişte ev ödevine yönelik tutum ve deneyimlerindeki değişimler de incelenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dalmaz, N. C., Tertemiz, N. I. (2025). The Effect of Differentiated Mathematics Homework on 4th Grade Primary Students’ Attitudes Towards Homework. Türk Akademik Yayınlar Dergisi (TAY Journal), Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 1–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/1558531

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (60)

  1. Abu-Hilal, M. M., Abdelfattah, F., Abduljabbar, A., & Marsh, H. W. (2013, June 24-25). Attitudes toward school, homework, subject matter value, self-concept and positive affect: A structural equation model. 5th IEA International Research Conference, Singapore.
  2. Albayrak, M., Yıldız, A., Berber, K., & Büyükkasap, E. (2004). İlköğretimde ders dışı etkinlikler ve bunlarla ilgili öğrenci davranışları hakkında velilerin görüşleri [Parents’ ideas about activities out of lesson and student behaviour interested with activities]. Gazi University Kastamonu Education Journal, 12(1), 13-18.
  3. Algani, Y. M. A., & Alhaija, Y. F. A. (2022). The impact of the homework in mathematics on learning style of Arab primary school students in Israel. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 6(11), 45-55.
  4. Arıkan, S. (2017). TIMSS 2011 verilerine göre Türkiye’deki ev ödevi ve matematik başarısı arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between homework and mathematics achievement in Turkey according to TIMSS 2011]. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 8(26), 256-276.
  5. Atlı, S. (2012). 4. sınıf fen ve teknoloji dersinde ev ödevlerinin öğrencilerin kavram öğrenme düzeylerine, akademik başarılarına ve ev ödevlerine yönelik tutumlarına etkisi [4. class of science and technology concept learning levels of homework students, academic achievement and attitudes towards homework effect]. (Publication No. 323619) [Master thesis, Niğde University]. National Thesis Center.
  6. Avcı, Ö., Çelik, H., & Bayram, K. (2022). Farklılaştırılmış öğretim uygulamalarının ortaokul öğrencilerin elektrik ünitesindeki başarısı ve girişimcilik becerisi üzerinde etkisi [Differentiated instructional practices’ effect on secondary school students’ academic success and entrepreneurship skills in the electricity unit]. Journal of Science, Mathematics, Entrepreneurship and Technology Education, 5(3), 278-297.
  7. Bora, A. (2018). Çevrimiçi ödev uygulamalarının ilkokul 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin akademik başarılarına ve ödeve ilişkin tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of online homework on 4th grade students’ academic achievements and attitude toward homework]. (Publication No. 505797) [Master thesis, Dokuz Eylül University]. National Thesis Center.
  8. Brophy, J. E. (1986). On motivating students (ED276724). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED276724
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook of data analysis for the social sciences]. Pegem.
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Özcan, E. A., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2019). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods in education]. Pegem.
  11. Cooper, H. (2001). The battle over homework: Common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents. Corwin.
  12. Cooper, H., James, J., & Scott, N. B. G. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 70-83.
  13. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1-62.
  14. Corno, L. (2000). Looking at homework differently. The Elementary School Journal, 100(5), 529-548.
  15. Çetinkaya, K., & Uzunkol, E. (2019). İlkokul 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin ev ödevlerine ilişkin algıları [Homework perception of fourth grade students]. Journal of Interdisciplinary Education: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 59-75.
  16. Çoban, H. (2019). Farklılaştırılmış öğretim tasarımının öğrencilerin matematiksel muhakeme becerilerine, biliş ötesi öğrenme stratejilerini kullanma düzeylerine ve problem çözme becerilerine etkisi [The effect of differentiated instructional design on students’ mathematical reasoning skills, levels of using metacognitive learning strategies and problem solving skills]. (Publication No. 580371) [Doctoral dissertation, Balıkesir University]. National Thesis Center.
  17. Demir, S. (2013). Farklılaştırılmış öğretim yöntemlerinin öğrencilerin akademik başarı, öğrenme yaklaşımları ve kalıcılık puanları üzerindeki etkisi [The effects of differentiated learning on student’s academic achievement, learning approaches and learning retention]. (Publication No. 327546) [Doctoral dissertation, Yıldız Technical University]. National Thesis Center.
  18. Demir, S. (2021). Uygulamalı örneklerle farklılaştırılmış öğretim yöntem ve teknikleri [Differentiated teaching methods and techniques with practical examples]. Eğiten Kitap.
  19. Demirel, Ö. (2011). Eğitimde program geliştirme [Program development in education]. Pegem.
  20. Duru, S., & Çöğmen, S. (2017). İlkokul-ortaokul öğrencileri ve velilerin ev ödevlerine yönelik görüşleri [Views of primary and secondary school students and their parents on homework]. Elementary Education Online, 16(1), 354-365.
  21. Ekinci, O. (2016). Farklılaştırılmış öğretim yaklaşımının ilkokul üçüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik dersindeki başarısına ve tutumuna etkisi [The effect of differentiated instruction on mathematical attitudes and achievements of third grade primary school learners]. (Publication No. 454413) [Master thesis, Çukurova University]. National Thesis Center.
  22. Elgit, A. (2019). İlkokul ikinci sınıf matematik dersinde yapılandırılmış ve geleneksel ev ödevlerinin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına ve ödeve yönelik tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of structured and traditional homework on students academic achievements and attitudes towards homework in primary second year mathematics]. (Publication No. 590390) [Master thesis, Aydın Adnan Menderes University]. National Thesis Center.
  23. Epstein, J. L., & Van-Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 181-193.
  24. Göl, B. (2021). Farklılaştırılmış öğretim uygulamalarının ikinci sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik başarısına etkisinin ve farklılaştırılmış öğretim uygulaması hakkındaki görüşlerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the effect of differentiated teaching practice on second grade students’ mathematics achievement and their views on differentiated teaching practices]. (Publication No. 693032) [Master thesis, Giresun University]. National Thesis Center. Graven, M. (2016). Teacher perceptions of the successes and challenges of a mathematics homework drive for primary learners. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (SAARMSTE) Pretoria, South Africa.
  25. Gün, H. (1995). Eğitim öğretimde program-öğretmen-ödev üçlüsü [Programme-teacher-homework triad in education]. Contemporary Education Journal, 213, 41-43.
  26. Hattie, J. (2013). Synlig læring – for lærere [Visible learning for teachers]. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
  27. Holte, K. L. (2016). Homework in primary school: Could it be made more child-friendly? Studia Paedagogica, 21(4), 13-33.
  28. Hong, E., Mason, Y., Peng, Y., & Lee, N. (2015). Effects of homework motivation and worry anxiety on homework achievement in mathematics and English. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(7), 491-514.
  29. Hong, E., & Wan, M., & Peng, N. (2011). Discrepancies between students’ and teachers’ perceptions of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(2), 280-308.
  30. Işık Tertemiz, N. (1991). Ödevin başarıya etkisi [The effect of homework on success]. Education and Science, 15(81), 49-57.
  31. Jamal, B., & Rizvi, S. A. A. (2021). The effects of assigning homework on the achievement of students at the primary school level. Sir Syed Journal of Education & Social Research, 4(2), 271-277.
  32. Kapıkıran, Ş., & Kıran, H. (1999). Türkiye’de ev ödevinin başarı etkisi üzerine yapılan bir çalışma [The effect of the homework on the student’s academic success in Turkey]. Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 112-123.
  33. Kaplan, G. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerine verilen matematik ödevleri hakkında öğrenci, öğretmen ve veli görüşleri [Opinions of students, teachers and parents about mathematics homeworks assigned to middle school students]. (Publication No. 517127) [Master thesis, Hacettepe University]. National Thesis Center.
  34. Karakaş, E. (2019). İlköğretim matematik dersinde farklılaştırılmış öğretim yaklaşımına uygun düzenlenen öğretim sürecinden yansımalar [Reflections on the teaching process in accordance with the differentiated teaching approach]. (Publication No. 566628) [Master thesis, Trabzon University]. National Thesis Center.
  35. Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Nobel.
  36. Kaur, B. (2011). Mathematics homework: A study of three grade eight classrooms in Singapore. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 187-206
  37. King, B. S. (2016). Elementary coteachers’ understanding about differentiated instructional ractices for students with disabilities [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies.
  38. Kohn, A. (2006). The homework myth: Why our kids get too much of a bad thing. Da Capo.
  39. Kuzgun, Y., & Deryakulu, D. (2004). Eğitimde bireysel farklılıklar [Individual differences in education]. Nobel.
  40. Maltese, A. V., Tai, R. H., & Fan, X. (2012). When is homework worth the time? Evaluating the association between homework and achievement in high school science and math. High School Journal, 96(1), 52-72.
  41. Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2022). PISA 2022 Türkiye sonuçları [PISA 2022 Türkiye results]. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://pisa.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2024_03/21120745_26152640_pisa2022_rapor.pdf
  42. Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. M. (2019). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom: A guide for instructional leaders. ASCD.
  43. Özer, B., & Öcal, S. (2012). İlköğretim 4. ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin ev ödevlerine yönelik tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of 4th and 5th grade students’ attitudes towards homework] Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education Journal, 18, 1-16.
  44. Pfeiffer, V. (2018). Homework policy review: A case study of a public school in the Western Cape province. South African Journal of Education, 38(1), 1-10.
  45. Smith, T. J., Walker, D. A., & McKenna, C. (2021). Homework characteristics as predictors of advanced math achievement and attitude among US 12th grade students. SN Social Sciences, 2(1), 1-13.
  46. Sousa, D. A., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2018). Differentiation and the brain: How neuroscience supports the learner-friendly classroom. Solution Tree.
  47. Suárez, N., Regueiro, B., Estévez, I., Ferradás, M. M., Guisande, A., & Rodríguez, S. (2019). Individual precursors of student homework behavioral engagement: The role of intrinsic motivation, perceived homework utility and homework attitude. Educational Psychology-Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-10.
  48. Şaldırdak, Z. (2012). Farklılaştırılmış öğretim uygulamalarının matematik başarısına etkisi [The effects of differentiated instruction practices on mathematics achievement]. (Publication No. 347373) [Master thesis, Ankara University]. National Thesis Center.
  49. Taş, F., & Sırmacı, N. (2018). Farklılaştırılmış öğretim tasarımının öğrencilerin bilişüstü becerilerine ve matematik akademik başarılarına etkisi [The effect of differentiated instructional design on students’ metacognitive skills and mathematics academic achievements]. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 20(2), 336-351.
  50. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  51. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.
  52. Trautwein, U., & Köller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement still much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 115-145.
  53. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Kastens, C., & Köller, O. (2006). Effort on homework in grades 5-9: Development, motivational antecedents, and the association with effort on classwork. Child Development, 77(4), 1094-1111.
  54. Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Students’ self-reported effort and time on homework in six school subjects: Between-students differences and within-student variation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 432.
  55. Turanlı, A. S. (2009). Öğretmenlerin ödeve ilişkin görüşleri: Ortamsal etmenlere dair nitel bir çalışma [Teachers’ opinions about homework: A qualitative study on contextual factors]. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 3(37), 129-143.
  56. Vatterott, C. (2009). Rethinking homework: Best practices that support diverse needs. ASCD.
  57. World Bank. (2021). Education in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: Findings from PISA. Retrieved October 18, 2023 from https://www.worldbank.org/eeca-pisa-report
  58. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Seçkin.
  59. Zentall, S. S., & Goldstein, S. (1999). Seven steps to homework success: A family guide for solving common homework problems. Specialty /A.D.D. Warehouse.
  60. Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(4), 397-417.