SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Special Education Journal: International / 2025 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Facilitated Communication (Facilitator): A Review of Historical Development, Advocates, and Opposing Views

Kolaylaştırılmış İletişim (Kolaylaştırıcı Kişi): Tarihsel Gelişim, Savunucular ve Karşıt Görüşler Üzerine Bir Derleme

Cahit Nuri(ULUSLARARASI KIBRIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0805-1972
Pages
91–108
Publication Date
2025-12-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These reviews question the accuracy of the method's application and the development of independent communication abilities, suggesting that while FC may be effective under certain conditions, it generally requires careful consideration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This review article provides a comprehensive evaluation of facilitated communication (FC), a method used for individuals with communication barriers, in light of its historical development, supporters, and critics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Facilitated communication first emerged in Australia in the 1970s and quickly gained popularity among therapists working with individuals facing communication difficulties, such as those with autism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These reviews question the accuracy of the method's application and the development of independent communication abilities, suggesting that while FC may be effective under certain conditions, it generally requires careful consideration.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kolaylaştırıcı · Kolaylaştırılmış İletişim · Yardımlı Yazma

Abstract

This review article provides a comprehensive evaluation of facilitated communication (FC), a method used for individuals with communication barriers, in light of its historical development, supporters, and critics. Facilitated communication first emerged in Australia in the 1970s and quickly gained popularity among therapists working with individuals facing communication difficulties, such as those with autism. The second part of the article focuses on the advocates of FC. Experts in this group argue that when applied correctly, FC can be an effective tool for individuals to express themselves. Various case studies are presented, showing how individuals with autism and other communication disabilities have achieved social and academic success through this method. However, FC has also faced serious criticism. The third section examines the opposing views, questioning FC from scientific and ethical perspectives. Critics argue that facilitators risk directing the messages of individuals and that the method may create false communication. These critiques gained prominence particularly in the late 1990s, with numerous scientific studies highlighting these concerns. Finally, the section titled "Systematic Reviews on Facilitated Communication" assesses the outcomes of various experimental studies examining the effectiveness of FC. These reviews question the accuracy of the method's application and the development of independent communication abilities, suggesting that while FC may be effective under certain conditions, it generally requires careful consideration.

Özet

Bu derleme makalesi, iletişim engelleri yaşayan bireyler için bir yöntem olan kolaylaştırılmış iletişimin (Kİ) tarihsel gelişimi, savunucuları ve karşıtları ışığında kapsamlı bir değerlendirme sunmaktadır. İlk olarak, kolaylaştırılmış iletişim, 1970’lerde Avustralya’da ortaya çıkmış ve özellikle otizm gibi iletişim güçlüğü çeken bireylerle çalışan terapistler arasında hızla yaygınlaşmıştır. Tarihsel süreçte, Kİ’nin gelişimi, bu yöntemin yayılımını destekleyen bir dizi teorik ve uygulamalı yaklaşımla birlikte genişlemiştir. Özellikle 1980’ler ve 1990’larda, alternatif ve artırıcı iletişim yöntemleri arasında popüler bir seçenek haline gelmiştir. Makalenin ikinci bölümünde, Kİ'nin savunucuları ele alınmaktadır. Bu gruptaki uzmanlar, Kİ’nin doğru bir şekilde uygulandığında bireylerin kendilerini ifade etmeleri için etkili bir araç olabileceğini savunmaktadır. Özellikle, otizmli bireyler ve diğer iletişim yetersizliği olan kişilerin bu yöntemle sosyal ve akademik başarılar elde ettiği çeşitli vaka çalışmaları sunulmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, Kİ’ye yönelik ciddi eleştiriler de mevcuttur. Üçüncü bölümde, Kİ’yi bilimsel geçerlilik ve etik açılardan sorgulayan karşıt görüşler incelenmiştir. Eleştirmenler, kolaylaştırıcıların bireylerin mesajlarını yönlendirme riski taşıdığını ve yöntemin sahte bir iletişim oluşturabileceğini iddia etmektedirler. Bu eleştiriler, özellikle 1990’ların sonlarına doğru yapılan birçok bilimsel araştırmada ön plana çıkmıştır. Son olarak, Kolaylaştırılmış İletişim Üzerine Karşıt Sistematik İncelemeler başlıklı bölüm, Kİ’nin etkinliğini inceleyen çeşitli deneysel çalışmaların sonuçlarını değerlendirmektedir. Bu incelemeler, yöntemin uygulama doğruluğunu ve bağımsız iletişim yeteneğinin gelişimini sorgulamakta, Kİ’nin belirli koşullar altında etkili olabileceği ancak genelde dikkatli bir değerlendirme gerektirdiğini öne sürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Nuri, C. (2025). Facilitated Communication (Facilitator): A Review of Historical Development, Advocates, and Opposing Views. Turkish Special Education Journal: International, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 91–108. https://doi.org/10.69485/tseji.1608022

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (102)

  1. Agin, G. (2006). Junk science: How politicians, corporations, and other hucksters betray us. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
  2. Allen, A. A., Schlosser, R. W., Brock, K. L., & Shane, H. C. (2017). The effectiveness of aided augmented input techniques for persons with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(3), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1338752
  3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1995). Facilitated communication [Position Statement]. Rockville, MD: Author.
  4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016). Code of ethics [Ethics]. Erişim adresi: https://www.asha.org/Code-of-Ethics/
  5. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2018a). Facilitated communication [Position Statement]. Erişim adresi: https://www.asha.org/policy/
  6. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2018b). Rapid prompting method [Position Statement]. Erişim adresi: https://www.asha.org/policy/
  7. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.-a). Augmentative and alternative communication [Evidence Maps]. Erişim adresi: https://apps.asha.org/EvidenceMaps/Maps/LandingPage/990772a6-9cd8-4203-a76c-6ccd91eac874
  8. Auerbach, D. (2015). Facilitated communication is a cult that won’t die. Slate. Erişim tarihi: 15 Ekim 2024. Autism National Committee. (t.y.). AutCom statement on facilitated communication. Erişim tarihi: 15 Ekim 2024.
  9. Bebko, J. M., Perry, A., & Bryson, S. (1996). Multiple method validation study of facilitated communication: II. Individual differences and subgroup results. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26(1), 19-42.
  10. Berger, C., & Kilpatrick, K. (1992). Facilitated communication guide and set materials. New Breakthroughs.
  11. Bernardi, L., & Tuzzi, A. (2011). Analyzing written communication in AAC contexts: A statistical perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27(3), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2011.610353
  12. Bernier, R., & Gerdts, J. (2010). Autism spectrum disorders: A reference. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC–CLIO.
  13. Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  14. Bigozzi, L., Zanobini, M., Tarchi, C., Cozzani, F., & Camba, R. (2012). Facilitated communication and autistic children: The problem of authorship. Life Span and Disability, 15(2), 55-74.
  15. Biklen, D. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 60(3), 291-314. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.60.3.013h5022862vu732
  16. Biklen, D. E., & Cardinal, D. N. (1997). Contested words, contested science: Unraveling the facilitated communication controversy. Teachers College Press.
  17. Biklen, D., & Duchan, J. F. (1994). “I am intelligent”: The social construction of mental retardation. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19(3), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699401900303
  18. Biklen, D., Saha, N., & Kliewer, C. (1995). How teachers confirm the authorship of facilitated communication: A portfolio approach. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699502000105
  19. Biklen, D., Winston Morton, M., Gold, D., Berrigan, C., & Swaminathan, S. (1992). Facilitated communication: Implications for individuals with autism. Topics in Language Disorders, 12(4), 1-28.
  20. Boynton, J. (2012). Facilitated communication—What harm it can do: Confessions of a former facilitator. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 6(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2012.674680
  21. Brady, N. C., Bruce, S., Goldman, A., Erickson, K., Mineo, B., Ogletree, B. T.,. Wilkinson, K. (2016). Communication services and supports for individuals with severe disabilities: Guidance for assessment and intervention. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(2), 121-138. http://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-121.2.121
  22. Broderick, A. A., & Kasa-Hendrickson, C. (2006). “I am thinking that speech is asinine”: Narrating complexities and rethinking the notion of “independence” in communication. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39(2), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640260600672310
  23. Cardinal, D. N., & Falvey, M. A. (2014). The maturing of facilitated communication: A means toward independent communication. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39(3), 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796914555581
  24. Cardinal, D. N., Hanson, D., & Wakeham, J. (1996). Investigation of authorship in facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 34(4), 231–242.
  25. Chan, J., & Nankervis, K. (2014). Stolen voices: Facilitated communication is an abuse of human rights. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8(4), 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2014.1001549
  26. Crossley, R. (1994). Facilitated communication training. Teachers College Press.
  27. Crossley, R. (1997). Speechless: Facilitating communication for people without voices. New York, NY: Dutton, Penguin Books.
  28. Crossley, S., & McDonald, J. (1980). The stability of Drosophila melanogaster courtship across matings. Animal Behaviour, 27(4), 1041-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(79)90051-4
  29. Dawson, M., Soulieres, I., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Mottron, L. (2007). The level and nature of autistic intelligence. Psychological Science, 18(8), 657–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01954.x
  30. Duchan, J. F., Calculator, S., Sonnenmeier, R., Diehl, S., & Cumley, G. D. (2001). A framework for managing controversial practices. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(3), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2001/011)
  31. Eberlin, M., McConnachie, G., Ibel, S., & Volpe, L. (1993). Facilitated communication: A failure to replicate the phenomenon. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23(3), 507-530. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046053
  32. Emerson, A., Grayson, A., & Griffiths, A. (2001). Can't or won't? Evidence relating to authorship in facilitated communication. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36(S1), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820109177866
  33. Emery Jr., C. E. (1994, Kasım 12). FC message technique for the handicapped unproven, experts say. Providence Journal, p. D-09.
  34. Felce, D. (1994). Facilitated communication: Results from a number of recently published evaluations. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(3), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1994.tb00133.x
  35. Finn, P., Bothe, A. K., & Bramlett, R. E. (2005). Science and pseudoscience in communication disorders: Criteria and applications. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(3), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2005/018)
  36. Ganz, J. B., Katsiyannis, A., & Morin, K. L. (2017). Facilitated communication: The resurgence of a disproven treatment for individuals with autism. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(1), 52-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217692564
  37. Goddard, P., & Goddard, D. (2012). I am intelligent: From heartbreak to healing: A mother and daughter journey through autism. Guilford, CT: Globe Pequot Press.
  38. Grayson, A., Emerson, A., Howard-Jones, P., & O’Neil, L. (2012). Hidden communicative competence: Case study evidence using eye-tracking and video analysis. Autism, 16(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361310393260
  39. Green, G. (1994). Mental miracle or sleight of hand? Skeptic, 2(3), 68-76.
  40. Green, G. (1994). The quality of the evidence. In H. C. Shane (Ed.), Facilitated communication: The clinical and social phenomenon (ss. 157–225). San Diego, CA: Singular Press.
  41. Greenbaum, K. (1992, Ekim 18). Autistic method disputed: Researcher says child not helped. Sun-Sentinel.
  42. Gunther, M. (2014, Nisan 5). Schools using the controversial method for autistic children. DN.se.
  43. Heath, A., Ganz, J., Parker, R., Burke, M., & Ninci, J. (2015). A meta-analytic review of functional communication training across mode of communication, age, and disability. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-014-0044-3
  44. Hemsley, B., Bryant, L., Schlosser, R. W., Shane, H. C., Lang, R., Paul, D.,. & Ireland, M. (2018). Systematic review of facilitated communication 2014–2018 finds no new evidence that messages delivered using facilitated communication are authored by the person with disability. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 3, 2396941518821570. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941518821570
  45. Hemsley, B., et al. (2018). Updating the Schlosser et al. (2014) systematic review of authorship in facilitated communication revealed no new authorship studies since 2014: Informing the new ASHA position statement on FC. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  46. Higashida, N. (2013). The reason I jump. New York, NY: Random House.
  47. Iacono, T., Trembath, D., & Erickson, S. (2016). The role of augmentative and alternative communication for children with autism: Current status and future trends. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 2349–2361. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S95967
  48. International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. (2014). ISAAC position statement on facilitated communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(4), 357-358. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.971492
  49. Ivy, J. W., & Schreck, K. A. (2016). The efficacy of ABA for individuals with autism across the lifespan. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 3(2), 57–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40474-016-0070-1
  50. Jacobson, J. W., Mulick, J. A., & Schwartz, A. A. (1995). A history of facilitated communication: Science, pseudoscience, and antiscience. American Psychologist, 50(9), 750–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.750
  51. Janzen-Wilde, M. L., Duchan, J. F., & Higginbotham, D. J. (1995). Successful use of facilitated communication with an oral child. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38(3), 658–676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3803.658
  52. Kasa-Hendrickson, C., Broderick, A. A., & Hanson, D. (2009). Sorting out speech: Understanding multiple methods of communication for persons with autism and other developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental Processes, 4(2), 116-133.
  53. Kim, R. (1992, Haziran 17). The magic touch keyboard technique helps severely disabled students learn to communicate. Los Angeles Times (Home Edition), p. 3. Arşivlendi: 2 Nisan 2015. Erişim: 18 Mart 2015.
  54. Kochmeister, S. J. (1999). My life as a prisoner. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
  55. Kurtz, P. F., Boelter, E. W., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Chin, M. D., & Hagopian, L. P. (2011). An analysis of functional communication training as an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior displayed by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(10), 2935–2942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.009
  56. Libman, G. (1992, Nisan 20). A controversial technique may be the key to providing sufferers with a way to communicate unlocking autism. Los Angeles Times (Home Edition), p. 1. Arşivlendi: 2 Nisan 2015. Erişim: 18 Mart 2015.
  57. Lilienfeld, S. O., Marshall, J., Todd, J. T., & Shane, H. C. (2014). The persistence of fad interventions in the face of negative scientific evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8(2), 62-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2014.976332
  58. Lof, G. (2011). Science-based practice and the speech language pathologist. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(3), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2011.528801
  59. Logan, K., Iacono, T., & Trembath, D. (2017). A systematic review of research into aided AAC to increase social-communication functions in children with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1267795
  60. Mangiacasale, A. (1992, Mart 15). New voice: System lets disabled communicate. The Ottawa Citizen (Final Edition).
  61. Mann, L. B. (2005, Şubat 27). Oscar nominee: Documentary or fiction? Film resurrects discredited autism tactic. The Washington Post (Final Edition), Health, F01. Erişim: 18 Mart 2024.
  62. Martin, R. (1994). Out of silence: An autistic boy’s journey into language and communication. New York, NY: Penguin.
  63. Miller, V. (2018, Şubat 23). University of Northern Iowa drops controversial conference. The Gazette. Erişim: 18 Mart 2024.
  64. Montee, B. B., Miltenberger, R. G., Wittrock, D., Watkins, N., Rheinberger, A., & Stackhaus, J. (1995). An experimental analysis of facilitated communication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28(2), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1995.28-189
  65. Mostert, M. P. (2001). Facilitated communication since 1995: A review of published studies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(3), 287–313. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010795219886
  66. Mostert, M. P. (2010). Facilitated communication and its legitimacy: Twenty-first century developments. Exceptionality, 18(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903462524
  67. Mostert, M. P. (2012). Facilitated communication: The empirical imperative to prevent further professional malpractice. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 6(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2012.693840
  68. Mulick, J. A., Jacobson, J. W., & Kobe, F. H. (1993). Anguished silence and helping hands: Autism and facilitated communication. Skeptical Inquirer, 17(3), 270–280. https://cdn.centerforinquiry.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/1993/04/22165148/p48.pdf
  69. Niemi, J., & Karna-Lin, E. (2002). Grammar and lexicon in facilitated communication: A linguistic authorship analysis of a Finnish case. Mental Retardation, 40(4), 347–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040%3C0347:GALIFC%3E2.0.CO;2
  70. Olsen, L., Gurry, S., Larkin, A., & McSheehan, M. (1992). A training guide to facilitated communication use: Implications for use with adults in community settings. Cambridge, MA: Lesley College.
  71. Palfreman, J. (1994). The Australian origins of facilitated communication. In H. Shane (Ed.), Facilitated communication: The clinical and social phenomenon (ss. 33–56). San Diego, CA: Singular Press.
  72. Probst, P. (2005). Communication unbound—or unfound? An integrative review on the effectiveness of facilitated communication (FC) in non-verbal persons with autism and mental retardation. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 53(2), 93-128.
  73. Riggott, J. (2005). Pseudoscience in autism treatment: Are the news and entertainment media helping or hurting? Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 4(1), 58–60.
  74. Rising, G. (2001, Mayıs 20). ‘Miraculous’ autism treatment stirs concern. Buffalo News (Final Edition), p. 2B. Buffalo, NY.
  75. Romski, M., & Sevcik, R. (Eds.). (2016). Communication interventions for individuals with severe disabilities: Exploring research challenges and opportunities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
  76. Rutter, M. (1968a). Child psychiatry. In M. Shepherd & D. Davies (Eds.), Studies in psychiatry (ss. 205–234). London: Oxford University Press.
  77. Saloviita, T., Leppänen, M., & Ojalammi, U. (2014). Authorship in facilitated communication: An analysis of 11 cases. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(3), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.927529
  78. Schlosser, R., Balandin, S., Hemsley, B., Iacono, T., Probst, P., & von Tetzchner, S. (2014). Facilitated communication and authorship: A systematic review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(4), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.971490
  79. Schwiegert, M. B. (2000, Kasım 5). Will to succeed: Lititz man battles autism – and goes to college. Lancaster New Era, p. D1. Lancaster, PA.
  80. Sellin, B. (1993). Ich will kein inmich mehr sein: Botschaften aus einem autistischen Kerker. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.
  81. Sheehan, C. M., & Matuozzi, R. T. (1996). Investigation of the validity of facilitated communication through disclosure of unknown information. Mental Retardation, 34(2), 94–107.
  82. Simmons, W. P., Boynton, J., & Landman, T. (2021). Facilitated communication, neurodiversity, and human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 43(1), 138-167. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2021.0005
  83. Snell, M. E., Brady, N., McLean, L., Ogletree, B. T., Siegel, E., Sylvester, L., … Sevcik, R. (2010). Twenty years of communication intervention research with individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115(5), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-115-5.364
  84. Stock, B. (2011). Mixed messages: Validity and ethics of facilitated communication. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v31i4.1725
  85. Travers, J. C., Tincani, M. J., & Lang, R. (2014). Facilitated communication denies people with disabilities their voice. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39(3), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796914556778
  86. Tuzzi, A. (2009). Grammar and lexicon in individuals with autism: A quantitative analysis of a large Italian corpus. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(5), 373–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-47.5.373
  87. United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
  88. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
  89. Virues-Ortega, J. (2010). Applied behavior analytic intervention for autism in early childhood: Meta-analysis, meta-regression and dose-response meta-analysis of multiple outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(4), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.008
  90. Vismara, L. A., & Rogers, S. J. (2010). Behavioral treatments in autism spectrum disorder: What do we know? Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6(1), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131151
  91. von Tetzchner, S. (1997). Historical issues in intervention research: Hidden knowledge and facilitating techniques in Denmark. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829709021453
  92. Vyse, S. (2020). A small victory of science in suburban Philadelphia. Skeptical Inquirer, 44(5). Erişim: 10 Ekim 2024.
  93. Walker, V. L., & Snell, M. E. (2013). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication on challenging behavior: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.785020
  94. Wehrenfennig, A., & Surian, L. (2008). Autismo e comunicazione facilitata: Una rassegna degli studi sperimentali. Psicologia Clinica Dello Sviluppo, 12(3), 437–464. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1449/28487
  95. Weiss, M. J., Wagner, S. H., & Bauman, M. L. (1996). A validated case study of facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 34(4), 220–230. https://europepmc.org/article/med/8828341
  96. Wheeler, D. L., Jacobson, J. W., Paglieri, R. A., & Schwartz, A. A. (1993). An experimental assessment of facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 31(1), 49–60. https://europepmc.org/article/med/8441353
  97. Willis, E. (2020). Medical dominance (2. baskı). New York, NY: Routledge.
  98. Wombles, K. (2014). Some fads never die – they only hide behind other names: Facilitated communication is not and never will be augmentative and alternative communication. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8(4), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2015.1012780
  99. Woodfield, C., & Ashby, C. (2016). The right path of equality: Supporting high school students with autism who type to communicate. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(4), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1088581
  100. Zanobini, M., & Scopesi, A. (2001). La comunicazione facilitata in un bambino autistico [Facilitated communication in an autistic child]. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 5(3), 395–421. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1449/635
  101. Brady, N. C., Bruce, S., Goldman, A., Erickson, K., Mineo, B., Ogletree, B. T.,. Wilkinson, K. (2016). Communication services and supports for individuals with severe disabilities: Guidance for assessment and intervention. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(2), 121-138. http://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-121.2.121
  102. Hemsley, B., Bryant, L., Schlosser, R. W., Shane, H. C., Lang, R., Paul, D.,. & Ireland, M. (2018). Systematic review of facilitated communication 2014–2018 finds no new evidence that messages delivered using facilitated communication are authored by the person with disability. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 3, 2396941518821570. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941518821570