SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Medical Student Journal / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

ASSESSMENT OF THE OPINIONS AND ATTITUDES OF MEDICAL STUDENTS TOWARDS LGBTQIA+ INDIVIDUALS

Fatih Erkan Akay(TRAKYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-7598-1016
Beliz Koçyiğit(TRAKYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-6056-0219
Amila Kafadar(Sarajevo University School of Medicine,)
Beril Ay(ACIBADEM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-1789-2132
Kaan Çifcibaşı(Ludwig Maximilian University School of Medicine)0000-0003-0830-9777
Çağrı Girit(TRAKYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-5989-0552
Nazlıcan Kükürtcü(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-0113-197X
Berra Kurtoğlu(TOBB EKONOMİ VE TEKNOLOJİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-9085-7563
Bengisu Gür(BEZM-İ ÂLEM VAKIF ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-4280-3317
Serdar Öztrora(TRAKYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ ANABİLİM DALI)
Pages
65–76
Publication Date
2020-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: PIn conclusion, thou- gh the majority of answers given indicate a positive approach towards LGBTQIA+ individuals, it can be stated that the attitude of medical students towards LGBTQIA+ individuals is by far suboptimal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: The aim of this multicentral study is to analyze the opinions and attitudes of medical students towards lesbian, gay, bi- sexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual individuals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 1116 medical students from 59 universities in Turkey, 1 from Bosnia and Herzegovina, and 7 universities from Germany have participated in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: PIn conclusion, thou- gh the majority of answers given indicate a positive approach towards LGBTQIA+ individuals, it can be stated that the attitude of medical students towards LGBTQIA+ individuals is by far suboptimal.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Medical student · sexual orientation · gender identity

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this multicentral study is to analyze the opinions and attitudes of medical students towards lesbian, gay, bi- sexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual individuals. Methods: A total of 1116 medical students from 59 universities in Turkey, 1 from Bosnia and Herzegovina, and 7 universities from Germany have participated in this study. The questionnaire consisted of 23 multiple-choice questions and an open-ended question. Data about the comparison of 1st and 6th year medical students were analyzed using the Pearson Chi-Squared test and the Fisher Exact test in IBM SPSS version 23.0.00. Results: The mean age of the participants was 21.2 ± 2.1 years (range: 17-34 years). There were 693 female, 417 male, 3 nonbinary, and 1 qu- eer participants, and two did not declare their gender. There were 263 (23.6%) 1st year, 315 (28.3%) 2nd year, 179 (16.0%) 3rd year, 112 (10.0%) 4th year, 98 (8.8%) 5th year, and 139 (12.5%) 6th year students. There were 10 (0.9%) missing data. In the 15th question asking whether LGBTQIA+ individuals have the right to adoption or not, the 18th question asking if their school is providing education on sexual health, the 19th question asking if they consider themselves educated about safe sexual intercour- se as an individual, and the 22nd question asking if they think that LGBTQIA+ individuals are more prone to catching sexually transmitted diseases, there were a significant difference between 1st graders and 6th graders. Conclusion: PIn conclusion, thou- gh the majority of answers given indicate a positive approach towards LGBTQIA+ individuals, it can be stated that the attitude of medical students towards LGBTQIA+ individuals is by far suboptimal.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akay, F. E., Koçyiğit, B., Kafadar, A., Ay, B., Çifcibaşı, K., Girit, Ç., Kükürtcü, N., Kurtoğlu, B., Gür, B., Öztrora, S. (2020). ASSESSMENT OF THE OPINIONS AND ATTITUDES OF MEDICAL STUDENTS TOWARDS LGBTQIA+ INDIVIDUALS. Turkish Medical Student Journal, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 65–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/1558229

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. McGuire TR. Is homosexuality genetic? A critical review and some suggestions. J Homosex 1995;28(1-2):115‐45.
  2. Rubinstein G. The decision to remove homosexuality from the DSM: twenty years later. Am J Psychother 1995;49(3):416‐27.
  3. Spitzer RL. The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III: a reformulation of the issues. Am J Psychiatry 1981;138(2):210‐5.
  4. Starr P. The social transformation of American medicine. 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books; 1982.
  5. Boehmer U. Twenty years of public health research: inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations. Am J Public He- alth 2002;92(7):1125‐30.
  6. Obedin-Maliver J, Goldsmith ES, Stewart L et al. Lesbian, gay, bi- sexual, and transgender–related content in undergraduate medical education. JAMA 2011;306(9):971-7.
  7. Dean L, Meyer IH, Robinson K et al. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health: findings and concerns. Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association 2000;4(3):1-51.
  8. Lee R. Health care problems of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgen- der patients. West J Med 2000;172(6):403‐8.
  9. Burke BP, White JC. The well-being of gay, lesbian, and bisexual physicians. West J Med 2001;174(1):59‐62.
  10. NgH.Lesbian,gay,bisexual,andtransgenderhealthandmedical education. JAMA 2011;306(21):2326-7.
  11. Fikar CR, Keith L. Information needs of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered health care professionals: results of an internet survey. J Med Libr Assoc 2004;92(1):56‐65.
  12. Simkin RJ. Not all your patients are straight. CMAJ 1998;159(4):370‐5.
  13. Mathews WC, Booth MW, Turner JD et al. Physicians' attitudes toward homosexuality - survey of a California county medical so- ciety. West J Med 1986;144(1):106-10.
  14. Lim FA, Brown DV Jr, Justin Kim SM. Addressing health care disparities in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender population: a review of best practices. Am J Nurs 2014;114(6):24-34.
  15. Yılmaz V, Göçmen İ. Türkiye’de lezbiyen, gey, biseksüel ve trans (LGBT) bireylerin sosyal ve ekonomik sorunları araştırmasının özet sonuçları. Research Turkey. 2015;4(6):94-101.
  16. Ertuğrul Ş, Batı AH. Tıp öğrencilerinin LGBTİ+ hastalara yakla- şımı. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 2019;18(56):81-94.
  17. Liang JJ, Gardner IH, Walker JA et al. Observed deficiencies in medical student knowledge of transgender and intersex health. En- docr Pract 2017;23(8):897-906.
  18. Hon KE, Leung T, Yau AP et al. A survey of attitudes toward ho- mosexuality in Hong Kong Chinese medical students. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2005;17(4):344-8.
  19. NamaN,MacPhersonP,SampsonMetal.Medicalstudents'per- ception of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) discrimi- nation in their learning environment and their self-reported comfort level for caring for LGBT patients: a survey study. Med Educ Online 2017;22(1):1368850.
  20. White W, Brenman S, Paradis E et al. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patient care: medical students' preparedness and com- fort. Teach Learn Med 2015;27(3):254-63.
  21. Gates GJ. LGBT demographics: comparisons among popula- tion-based surveys. UCLA: The Williams Institute 2014. Available from: URL:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0kr784fx.
  22. Davis RM, Genel M, Howe JP et al. Health care needs of gay men and lesbians in the United States. JAMA 1996;275(17):1354-9.
  23. Aprovider’shandbookonculturallycompetentcare:lesbian,gay, bisexual and transgender population. 1st ed. California: Kaiser Per- manente; 2000.
  24. Kelley L, Chou CL, Dibble SL et al. A critical intervention in les- bian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health: knowledge and attitude outcomes among second-year medical students. Teach Learn Med 2008;20(3):248-53.