SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science / 2023 / Volume: 4 Issue: 2

Performances of Some Perennial Legume and Grass Mixtures under Rainfed Conditions of a Continental Climate Region

Tamer Yavuz(AHİ EVRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7374-7899
Hakan Kır(AHİ EVRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3124-0491
Pages
—
Publication Date
2023-12-07
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, the mixtures of A+S+IW+SB and A+LB+IW+SB can be recommended for mowing, while the S+LB+IW+SB mixtures can be recommended for grazing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Forage yield and the quality of the pastures in Turkey, especially in Central Anatolia, where the continental climate is dominant, are very low, and their vegetation is degraded to a great extent due to use without proper management practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The inadequacy of the forage crop production in agricultural land and the low yield and quality of forage are among the main problems of husbandry.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, the mixtures of A+S+IW+SB and A+LB+IW+SB can be recommended for mowing, while the S+LB+IW+SB mixtures can be recommended for grazing.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:grass · legume · mixture

Abstract

Forage yield and the quality of the pastures in Turkey, especially in Central Anatolia, where the continental climate is dominant, are very low, and their vegetation is degraded to a great extent due to use without proper management practices. The inadequacy of the forage crop production in agricultural land and the low yield and quality of forage are among the main problems of husbandry. The present study aimed to determine perennial legume and grass mixtures with high forage yield and quality under rainfed conditions of the continental climate region in Turkey. The experimental design was randomized blocks with three replications. In the experiment, smooth brome (SB), intermediate wheatgrass (IW), alfalfa (A), sainfoin (S), and lesser burnet (LB) were sown as pure and mixed in different ratios. Two years averaged values of dry matter yield and crude protein, Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF), and Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) contents of dry matter varied between 2613 and 6268 kg ha-1;118 and 205 g kg-1; 249 and 424 g kg-1, 416 and 558 g kg-1, respectively. Higher dry matter yields were obtained from A+S+IW+SB, S+LB+IW+SB, A+LB+IW+SB, S+IW, and A+IW+SB mixtures. The pure sowings of the SB, IW, and LB gave lower dry matter yields than the mixtures. Crude protein contents of alfalfa and sainfoin were higher than other pure sowings and mixtures. The ADF and NDF contents of mixtures were higher than those of pure sown of alfalfa, sainfoin, and lesser burnet, they were lower than those of IW and SB. In terms of dry matter yield, crude protein yield, ADF and NDF content, A+S+IW+SB, A+LB+IW+SB, and S+LB+IW+SB mixtures were superior to other mixtures and pure sowings. Alfalfa may be predominant in mixtures over time, and animal health problems may occur under grazing conditions. Therefore, the mixtures of A+S+IW+SB and A+LB+IW+SB can be recommended for mowing, while the S+LB+IW+SB mixtures can be recommended for grazing.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yavuz, T., Kır, H. (2023). Performances of Some Perennial Legume and Grass Mixtures under Rainfed Conditions of a Continental Climate Region. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, Volume: 4 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.51801/turkjrfs.1386240

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (62)

  1. Açıkgöz, E. (2021). Yem Bitkileri (Vol. I). Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, Bitkisel Üretim Genel Müdürlüğü.
  2. Albayrak, S., & Türk, M. (2013). Changes in the forage yield and quality of legume–grass mixtures throughout a vegetation period. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 37(2), 139-147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1202-73
  3. Albayrak, S., Türk, M., Yüksel, O., & Yilmaz, M. (2011). Forage Yield and the Quality of Perennial Legume-Grass Mixtures under Rainfed Conditions. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 39(1), 114. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.15835/nbha3915853
  4. Altın, M., Gokkus, A., & Koc, A. (2021). Meadow and Range Improvement and Development. Palme Publ. Inc,.
  5. ANKOM. (2005). Method for determining acid detergent lignin in beakers. ANKOM Technology. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2022 from https://www.ankom.com/sites/default/files/document-files/Method_8_Lignin_in_beakers_0.pdf
  6. Annicchiarico, P., Collins, R. P., De Ron, A. M., Firmat, C., Litrico, I., & Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. (2019). Do we need specific breeding for legume-based mixtures? In D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Advances in Agronomy (Vol. 157, pp. 141-215). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2019.04.001
  7. Anonymous. (2012). Result Report of National Rangeland Management Project (Project Number: 106G017)
  8. AOAC. (1990). Method 990.03: Protein in Animal Feed. In G. W. Latimer (Ed.), Official methods of analysis (19th ed.). AOAC International.
  9. Aponte, A., Samarappuli, D., & Berti, M. T. (2019). Alfalfa–Grass Mixtures in Comparison to Grass and Alfalfa Monocultures. Agronomy Journal, 111(2), 628-638. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.12.0753
  10. Bani, P., Minuti, A., Luraschi, O., Ligabue, M., & Ruozzi, F. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences onin vitrodigestibility of alfalfa. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 6(sup1), 251-253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.251
  11. Barnes, R. F., Nelson, C., Collins, M., & Moore, K. (2003). Forages. Volume 1: An introduction to grassland agriculture. (Vol. 1).
  12. Barneze, A. S., Whitaker, J., McNamara, N. P., & Ostle, N. J. (2020). Legumes increase grassland productivity with no effect on nitrous oxide emissions. Plant and Soil, 446(1-2), 163-177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04338-w
  13. Baron, V. S., Dick, A. C., & King, J. R. (2000). Leaf and stem mass characteristics of cool‐season grasses grown in the Canadian Parkland. Agronomy Journal, 92(1), 54-63. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.92154x
  14. Bhattarai, S., Coulman, B., & Biligetu, B. (2016). Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.): renewed interest as a forage legume for western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 96(5), 748-756. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2015-0378
  15. Biligetu, B., Jefferson, P. G., Muri, R., & Schellenberg, M. P. (2014). Late summer forage yield, nutritive value, compatibility of warm- and cool-season grasses seeded with legumes in western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 94(7), 1139-1148. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2013-269
  16. Bork, E. W., Gabruck, D. T., McLeod, E. M., & Hall, L. M. (2017). Five-Year Forage Dynamics Arising from Four Legume-Grass Seed Mixes. Agronomy Journal, 109(6), 2789-2799. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.02.0069
  17. Brink, G., Sanderson, M., & Casler, M. (2015). Grass and legume effects on nutritive value of complex forage mixtures. Crop Science, 55(3), 1329-1337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.09.0666
  18. Bruno-Soares, A. M., Abreu, J. M. F., Guedes, C. V. M., & Dias-Da-Silva, A. A. (2000). Chemical composition, DM and NDF degradation kinetics in rumen of seven legume straws. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 83(1), 75-80. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0377-8401(99)00113-3
  19. Canbolat, Ö., & Karaman, Ş. (2009). Comparison of in VitroGas Production, Organic Matter Digestibility, Relative Feed Value and Metabolizable Energy Contents of Some Legume Forages. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 15(2), 188-195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001090
  20. Castillo, M. S., Sollenberger, L. E., Mullenix, M. K., Blount, A. R., Williams, M. J., & Mackowiak, C. L. (2015). Grazing Management Affects Establishment Performance of Rhizoma Peanut Strip Planted into Bahiagrass Pasture. Crop Science, 55(5), 2384-2389. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.02.0090
  21. Cinar, S., & Hatipoglu, R. (2015). Quality Characteristics of The Mixtures of Some Warm Season Perennial Grasses With Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.) Under Irrigated Conditions of Cukurova. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.17557/.36336
  22. Cox, S., Peel, M. D., Creech, J. E., Waldron, B. L., Eun, J.-S., Zobell, D. R., Miller, R. L., & Snyder, D. L. (2017). Forage Production of Grass-Legume Binary Mixtures on Intermountain Western USA Irrigated Pastures. Crop Science, 57(3), 1742-1753. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2016.04.0235
  23. Cui, S., Allen, V. G., Brown, C. P., & Wester, D. B. (2013). Growth and Nutritive Value of Three Old World Bluestems and Three Legumes in the Semiarid Texas High Plains. Crop Science, 53(1), 329-340. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.02.0107
  24. Ćupina, B., Vujić, S., Krstić, D., Djurić, B., Aliu, S., Manojlović, M., Čabilovski, R., & Lombnaes, P. (2017). Performance of legume–grass mixtures in the West Balkan region. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B—Soil & Plant Science, 67(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2016.1208268
  25. Dhakal, D., & Islam, M. (2018). Grass-Legume Mixtures for Improved Soil Health in Cultivated Agroecosystem. Sustainability, 10(8), 2718. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082718
  26. Elgersma, A., & Søegaard, K. (2016). Effects of species diversity on seasonal variation in herbage yield and nutritive value of seven binary grass-legume mixtures and pure grass under cutting. European Journal of Agronomy, 78, 73-83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.04.011
  27. Elgersma, A., Søegaard, K., & Jensen, S. K. (2014). Herbage dry-matter production and forage quality of three legumes and four non-leguminous forbs grown in single-species stands. Grass and Forage Science, 69(4), 705-716. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12104
  28. Foster, A., Vera, C. L., Malhi, S. S., & Clarke, F. R. (2014). Forage yield of simple and complex grass–legume mixtures under two management strategies. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 94(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjps2013-095
  29. Gierus, M., Kleen, J., Loges, R., & Taube, F. (2012). Forage legume species determine the nutritional quality of binary mixtures with perennial ryegrass in the first production year. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 172(3-4), 150-161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.026
  30. Gökkuş, A., Koç, A., Serın, Y., Comakli, B., Tan, M., & Kantar, F. (1999). Hay yield and nitrogen harvest in smooth bromegrass mixtures with alfalfa and red clover in relation to nitrogen application. European Journal of Agronomy, 10(2), 145-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(98)00061-6
  31. Grev, A. M., Wells, M. S., Samac, D. A., Martinson, K. L., & Sheaffer, C. C. (2017). Forage Accumulation and Nutritive Value of Reduced Lignin and Reference Alfalfa Cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 109(6), 2749-2761. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.04.0237
  32. Gürsoy, E., Kaya, A., & Gül, M. (2021). Determining the nutrient content, energy, and in vitro true digestibility of some grass forage plants. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 417-422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2021.v33.i5.2696
  33. Helgadóttir, Á., Suter, M., Gylfadóttir, T. Ó., Kristjánsdóttir, T. A., & Lüscher, A. (2018). Grass–legume mixtures sustain strong yield advantage over monocultures under cool maritime growing conditions over a period of 5 years. Annals of Botany, 122(2), 337-348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy074
  34. Hoffman, P. C., Shaver, R. D., Combs, D. K., Undersander, D. J., Bauman, L. M., & Seeger, T. K. (2001). Understanding NDF digestibility of forages. Focus on forage, 3(10), 1-3. https://fyi.extension.wisc.edu/forage/files/2014/01/NDFDig.pdf
  35. Jeranyama, P., & Garcia, A. D. (2004). Understanding relative feed value (RFV) and relative forage quality (RFQ). Retrieved Nov. 15, 2022 from https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1351&context=extension_extra
  36. Johansen, M., Lund, P., & Weisbjerg, M. (2018). Feed intake and milk production in dairy cows fed different grass and legume species: a meta-analysis. Animal, 12(1), 66-75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001215
  37. Kaplan, M., Kamalak, A., Kasra, A. A., & Güven, İ. (2014). Effect of maturity stages on potential nutritive value, methane production and condensed tannin content of Sanguisorba minor hay. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(3), 445-449. https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2013.10383
  38. Lardy, G. (2018). Quality forage series: Forage Nutrition for Ruminants. North Dakota State Univ. Fargo, North, 1250, 1-16. https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/sites/default/files/2022-07/as1250.pdf
  39. Lüscher, A., Mueller‐Harvey, I., Soussana, J. F., Rees, R. M., & Peyraud, J. L. (2014). Potential of legume‐based grassland-livestock systems in Europe: a review. Grass and Forage Science, 69(2), 206-228. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12124
  40. Malisch, C. S., Suter, D., Studer, B., & Lüscher, A. (2017). Multifunctional benefits of sainfoin mixtures: Effects of partner species, sowing density and cutting regime. Grass and Forage Science, 72(4), 794-805. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12278
  41. Mandebvu, P., Klingener, J. L., Lacoss, D. D., Ballard, C. S., Sniffen, C. J., & Kramer, S. R. (2001). Effects of source and level of nitrogen, and changing buffer/ruminal fluid at 48 h on in vitro digestion of feedstuffs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 93(1-2), 43-54. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0377-8401(01)00268-1
  42. McDonald, I., Baral, R., & Min, D. (2021). Effects of alfalfa and alfalfa-grass mixtures with nitrogen fertilization on dry matter yield and forage nutritive value. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 63(2), 305-318. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e33
  43. McElroy, M., Papadopoulos, Y. A., Glover, K. E., Dong, Z., Fillmore, S. A. E., & Johnston, M. O. (2016). Interactions between Cultivars of Legumes Species (Trifolium pratense L., Medicago sativa L.) and Grasses (Phleum pratense L., Lolium perenne L.) Under Different Nitrogen Levels. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2016-0130
  44. Meza, K., Vanek, S. J., Sueldo, Y., Olivera, E., Ccanto, R., Scurrah, M., & Fonte, S. J. (2022). Grass–Legume Mixtures Show Potential to Increase Above- and Belowground Biomass Production for Andean Forage-Based Fallows. Agronomy, 12(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010142
  45. Mülayim, M., Acar, R., & Demirbag, N. Ş. (2009). Çayır Düğmesi (Sanguisorba minor Scop.). In R. Avcıoglu, Hatipoglu, R., Karadag, Y (Ed.), Yem Bitkileri, Buğdaygil ve Diğer Familyalardan Yem Bitkileri (Vol. III, pp. 757-764). Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Tarımsal Üretim ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü.
  46. Sanderson, M., Soder, K., Muller, L., Klement, K., Skinner, R., & Goslee, S. (2005). Forage mixture productivity and botanical composition in pastures grazed by dairy cattle. Agronomy Journal, 97(5), 1465-1471. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0032
  47. Sanderson, M. A., Brink, G., Stout, R., & Ruth, L. (2013). Grass–Legume Proportions in Forage Seed Mixtures and Effects on Herbage Yield and Weed Abundance. Agronomy Journal, 105(5), 1289-1297. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2013.0131
  48. Serajchi, M., Schellenberg, M. P., Mischkolz, J. M., & Lamb, E. G. (2018). Mixtures of native perennial forage species produce higher yields than monocultures in a long-term study. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 98(3), 633-647. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2017-0087
  49. Solati, Z., Manevski, K., Jørgensen, U., Labouriau, R., Shahbazi, S., & Lærke, P. E. (2018). Crude protein yield and theoretical extractable true protein of potential biorefinery feedstocks. Industrial Crops and Products, 115, 214-226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.010
  50. Steel, R. G. D., & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principles and procedures of statistics, a biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd.
  51. Sturludóttir, E., Brophy, C., Bélanger, G., Gustavsson, A. M., Jørgensen, M., Lunnan, T., & Helgadóttir, Á. (2014). Benefits of mixing grasses and legumes for herbage yield and nutritive value in Northern Europe and Canada. Grass and Forage Science, 69(2), 229-240. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12037
  52. Suryanah, S., Rochana, A., Susilawati, I., & Indiriani, N. P. (2018). Ramie (Boehmeria nivea) Plant Nutrient Quality as Feed Forage at Various Cut Ages. Animal Production, 19(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2017.19.2.590
  53. Tessema, Z., & Baars, R. (2006). Chemical composition, dry matter production and yield dynamics of tropical grasses mixed with perennial forage legumes. Tropical Grasslands, 40(3), 150-156. https://www.tropicalgrasslands.info/public/journals/4/Historic/Tropical%20Grasslands%20Journal%20archive/ PDFs/Vol_40_2006/Vol_40_03_2006_pp150_156.pdf
  54. Tessema, Z. K., & Feleke, B. S. (2018). Yield, yield dynamics and nutritional quality of grass-legume mixed pasture. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 28(1), 155-164. https://www.thejaps.org.pk/docs/v-28-01/21.pdf
  55. Unathi, G., Nobulungisa, M., & Solomon, T. B. (2018). Benefits of grass-legume inter-cropping in livestock systems. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(26), 1311-1319. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.5897/ajar2018.13172
  56. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583-3597. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2
  57. Villalba, J. J., Cabassu, R., & Gunter, S. (2015). Forage choice in pasturelands: Influence on cattle foraging behavior and performance. Journal of Animal Science, 93(4), 1729-1740. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8667
  58. Yavuz, T., & Karadağ, Y. (2016). Performances of some forage grasses, legumes and their mixtures under dry pasture conditions. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 33(2), 63-71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag981
  59. Yavuz, T., Kır, H., & Gül, V. (2020). Evaluation of Roughage Production Potential in Türkiye: The Case of Kırşehir Province [Review]. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(3), 345-352. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.728119
  60. Yüksel, O., & Balabanli, C. (2021). Yield and Some Quality Properties of Binary Alfalfa-Grass Mixtures in Different Mixture Ratios. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 9(6), 1020-1029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v9i6.1020-1029.4035
  61. Zemenchik, R. A., Albrecht, K. A., & Shaver, R. D. (2002). Improved Nutritive Value of Kura Clover– and Birdsfoot Trefoil–Grass Mixtures Compared with Grass Monocultures. Agronomy Journal, 94(5), 1131-1138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.1131
  62. Altın, M., Gokkus, A., & Koc, A. (2021). Meadow and Range Improvement and Development. Palme Publ. Inc,.