Journals / Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

-

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİNDE KARBON SALINIMININ SOSYAL MALİYETİNİ DİKKATE ALAN BİR MODEL ÖNERİSİ: BİR MERMER İŞLETMESİ ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
177–193
Publication Date
2015-10-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The result of the study showed that the legislations force firms to bear to the social cost of carbon emissions resulting from operational activities and encourage them to invest more in this direction

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to develop a strategic decision making model for a marble manufacturing firm which has suppliers, manufacturing plants and distribution centers by taking into account the minimization of sum of social and operational costs resulting from the sustainable supply chain network carbon emission.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Operational costs include purchasing, production and transportation costs and on the other hand social costs are associated with the carbon emissions resulting from the production and transportation operations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The result of the study showed that the legislations force firms to bear to the social cost of carbon emissions resulting from operational activities and encourage them to invest more in this direction
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Karbon Salınımı · Sosyal Maliyet · Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi

Abstract

This study aims to develop a strategic decision making model for a marble manufacturing firm which has suppliers, manufacturing plants and distribution centers by taking into account the minimization of sum of social and operational costs resulting from the sustainable supply chain network carbon emission. Operational costs include purchasing, production and transportation costs and on the other hand social costs are associated with the carbon emissions resulting from the production and transportation operations. The mathematical model developed in the study was solved by using software and it offered the most appropriate transportations scenarios for decision makers. In this study, the social cost of carbon emission was found to be a critical function that firms need to calculate in order to ensure sustainability in a supply chain. However, although the study has been made in a marble manufacturing firm, it may provide insights for different sectors. The result of the study showed that the legislations force firms to bear to the social cost of carbon emissions resulting from operational activities and encourage them to invest more in this direction

Özet

Çalışma, tedarikçileri, üretim tesisi ve dağıtım merkezleri olan bir mermer işletmesinde sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri ağında karbon salınımından kaynaklanan sosyal maliyeti ve işletim maliyetlerinin toplamını en küçüklemeyi dikkate alan stratejik bir karar verme modelinin geliştirilmesini amaçlamaktadır. İşletim maliyeti, malzeme satın alma, üretim ve ulaştırma maliyetlerini içerirken; sosyal maliyet, üretim ve ulaştırma faaliyetleri sonucu ortaya çıkan karbon salınımı ile ilgilidir. Çalışmada geliştirilen matematiksel model bir program sayesinde çözülerek karar vericiye en uygun ulaştırma senaryosu sunmuş olacaktır. Çalışmada, karbon salınımının sosyal maliyeti tedarik zincirinde sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanması adına işletmelerin hesaplamaları gereken çok önemli bir fonksiyon olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca uygulama her ne kadar mermer işletmesinde yapılsa da farklı sektörler içinde örnek teşkil etmektedir. Çalışmanın neticesinde, ortaya konulan yasal düzenlemeler işletmeleri iş süreçlerinin sonucunda ortaya çıkan karbondioksit salınımının sosyal maliyetini üstlenmeleri yönünde zorladığı ve bu yönde daha fazla yatırım yapmaya teşvik ettiği görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİŞMAN, B. (2015). -. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 177–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/155735

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alzaman, C. (2014). Green supply chain modelling: literature review. International Journal of Bussiness Performans Supply Chain Model, 6 (1), 16–39.
  2. Andrew, B. (2008). Market failure, government failure and externalities in climate change mitigation: The case for a carbon tax. Public Administration Development, 28 (5), 393-401.
  3. Anthoff, D., Hepburn, C., & Tol, R. S. J. (2009). Equity weighting and the marginal damage costs of climate change. Ecological Economies, 68 (3), 836-849.
  4. Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economies, 124 (1), 252-264.
  5. Elhedhli, S. & Merrick R. (2012). Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions. Transportation Research Part D, 17, 370-379.
  6. Etchart, A., Sertyesilisik, B., & Mill, G. (2012). Environmental effects of shipping imports from China and their economic valuation: The case of metallic valve components. Journal of Cleaner Production, 21 (1), 51-61.
  7. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345-354.
  8. Guo, J., Hepburn, C., Tol, R. S. J., & Anthoff, D. (2006). Discounting and the social cost of carbon: A closer look at uncertainty. Environment Scientific Pollution, 9 (3), 205-216.
  9. Hasan, M. (2013). Sustainable supply chain management practices and operational performance. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3, 42-48.
  10. Kapp, K. W. (1963). The social costs of business enterprise. (second ed.) Nottingham: Spokesman, Karl, T. R., & Trenberth, K. E. (2003). Modern global climate change. Science, 302 (5651), 1719-1723.
  11. Kumbaroğlu G. ve Arıkan Y. (2009). Farkındalık ve fark yaratmak: Türkiye’nin CO2 salımları. İstanbul:
  12. Yelken Basım. Li F., Liu T., Zhang, H., Cao R., Ding W., & Fasano J. P. (2008). Distribution center location for green supply chain, IEEE International Conference On Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, Beijing, China, 12-15 October 2008.
  13. Linton, J. D., Klassen, R. & Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chain: An introduction, Journal of Operations Management, 25, 1075-1082.
  14. Liu, S., Kasturiratne, D., & Moizer, J. (2012). A hub-and-spoke model for multi dimensional integration of green marketing and sustainable supply chain management. Industrial Marketeting Management, 41 (