Journals / Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Pro-Environmental Consumption Behavior: Dimensions And Measurement

Çevreci Tüketim Davranışı: Boyutları ve Ölçümü

Pages
42–66
Publication Date
2018-08-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, the findings about Turkish consumers’ environmental behavior have been summarized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pro-environmental consumption behavior, highly emphasized within the scope of sustainable development, has been operationalized with different types and levels in the extant national and international literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Consequently, data were collected from surveys of 707 participants in Istanbul, Kocaeli, Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, the findings about Turkish consumers’ environmental behavior have been summarized.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çevreci Tüketim · Pro-Environmental Consumption · Higher Order Scale

Abstract

Pro-environmental consumption behavior, highly emphasized within the scope of sustainable development, has been operationalized with different types and levels in the extant national and international literature. The main objective of this research is to propose a multidimensional "pro-environmental consumption" scale covering behaviors that represent each stage of the consumption process, conceptualizing environmental behavior through a process approach. It was also aimed to explore Turkish consumers’ frequency of behaviors that appeared in different stages of the consumption process and contributed to the reduction of environmental problems, and also examine which behaviors were more closely related to environmental sensitivities. Consequently, data were collected from surveys of 707 participants in Istanbul, Kocaeli, Ankara. As the result of the research, a higher order factor pro-environmental consumption scale, covering two first-order factors (green consumption in pre-purchase stage and recycling behavior in post consumption stage) and one second order factor (energy conservation during consumption stage) has been validated. Moreover, the findings about Turkish consumers’ environmental behavior have been summarized.

Özet

Sürdürülebilir kalkınma kapsamında önemle üzerinde durulan çevreci tüketim davranışının ulusal ve uluslararası literatürde farklı şekillerde ve düzeylerde operasyonelleştirildiği görülmektedir. Bu araştırmanın temel amacı çevreci davranışı süreç yaklaşım ile kavramsallaştırarak, tüketim sürecinin her aşamasını temsil eden davranışlardan oluşan çok boyutlu “çevreci tüketim” ölçeğinin önerilmesidir. Araştırmada aynı zamanda tüketim sürecinin farklı aşamalarında ortaya çıkan ve çevre sorunlarının azaltılmasına katkı sağlayan davranışların Türk tüketicileri tarafından hangi sıklıkta sergilendiği, hangi davranışların çevreci hassasiyetlerle daha yakından ilişkili olduğunun araştırılması hedeflenmiştir. Bu doğrultuda, İstanbul, Kocaeli, Ankara’da toplam 707 katılımcıdan anket yöntemi ile veri toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, iki adet birinci düzey faktör (tüketim öncesinde çevreyi koruyan ürünlerin tercihi olan yeşil tüketim ve tüketim sonrasında geri dönüşüm) ve bir adet ikinci düzey faktörü (kullanım sırasındaki enerji tasarrufu) kapsayan üst düzey çevreci tüketim davranışı ölçeğinin uygun olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca Türk tüketicilerinin çevreci davranışlarının doğasına ilişkin bulgular özetlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

DURSUN, İ., KABADAYI, E. T., TUĞER, A. T. (2018). Pro-Environmental Consumption Behavior: Dimensions And Measurement. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 42–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/155694

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273-291.
  2. Alwitt, L. F., & Pitts, R. E. (1996). Predicting purchase intentions for an environmentally sensitive product. Journal of consumer psychology, 5(1), 49-64.
  3. Antil, J. H. (1984). Socially responsible consumers: Profile and implications for public policy. Journal of Macromarketing, 4(2), 18-39.
  4. Argo, J. J., & White, K. (2012). When do consumers eat more? The role of appearance self-esteem and food packaging cues. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 67-80.
  5. Axelrod, L. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1993). Responding to environmental concerns: What factors guide individual action? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(2), 149-159.
  6. Balderjahn, I. (1988). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 17(1), 51-56.
  7. Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environment and Behavior, 35(2), 264-285.
  8. Barbarossa, C., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2016). Positive and negative antecedents of purchasing eco-friendly products: A comparison between green and non-green consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 229-247.
  9. Barr, S., Gilg, A. W., & Ford, N. (2005). The household energy gap: Examining the divide between habitual-and purchase-related conservation behaviours. Energy Policy, 33(11), 1425-1444.
  10. Barr, S. (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A UK case study of household waste management. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 435-473.
  11. Başar, E. E. (2016) Hane halklarının sürdürülebilir tüketim davranışlarının ölçülmesine yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, Erzurum. Berger, I. E., & Corbin, R. M. (1992). Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11(2), 79-89.
  12. Bodur, M., & Sarigöllü, E. (2005). Environmental sensitivity in a developing country: Consumer classification and implications. Environment and Behavior, 37(4), 487-510.
  13. Bratt, C. (1999). The impact of norms and assumed consequences on recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 31(5), 630-656.
  14. Bratt, C.