SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Geosciences / 2020 / Volume: 1 Issue: 2

Integration of Different Methods for Architectural Survey of Historical and Cultural Heritages

Sevgi Böge(Selçuk Üniversitesi, Kadınhanı Faik İçil Meslek Yüksekokulu)0000-0001-6159-9721
Hakan Karabörk(MÜHENDİSLİK VE DOĞA BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-7387-7004
Pages
—
Publication Date
2020-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it is recommended to use the methods together in documentation studies of objects with different properties.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Protection and documentation of cultural heritages which have historical significance for the sake of continuity of culture are inevitable events.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the light of this thought, using new techniques, in comparison to classic methods arising of new techniques in parallel with technology in order to achieve the most reliable results in works such as restoration, reconstruction, building survey and documentation of cultural entities are inevitable.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it is recommended to use the methods together in documentation studies of objects with different properties.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:UAV · Laser Scanning · Architectural Photogrammetry

Abstract

Protection and documentation of cultural heritages which have historical significance for the sake of continuity of culture are inevitable events. In the light of this thought, using new techniques, in comparison to classic methods arising of new techniques in parallel with technology in order to achieve the most reliable results in works such as restoration, reconstruction, building survey and documentation of cultural entities are inevitable. In this study, Sille Aya-i Eleni Church, which has historical and cultural significance that can be evaluated in terms of architecture and allows the application of different techniques, was chosen. Different purchasing methods and drawing operations were carried out in accordance with the features of the selected object. The exterior drawings of the object, which will be created in a three dimensional model, are made with the photogrammetric method, while roof surveys that have risk are made thanks to the photographs taken with UAV. The surveying and drawing of the interior of the same object was also performed with a laser scanner. As a result, it is recommended to use the methods together in documentation studies of objects with different properties.

🔖

Cite This Article

Böge, S., Karabörk, H. (2020). Integration of Different Methods for Architectural Survey of Historical and Cultural Heritages. Turkish Journal of Geosciences, Volume: 1 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1556421

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Altay, G., Sağıroğlu, Ö. (2019). Heritage recording with 3D laser technology: The case of Lord’ s Bath (Bey Hamami) In Muğla, Milas. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 7(4), 489-496.
  2. Böge, S. (2013). Tarihi ve kültürel varlıkların rölöve alımı için farklı yöntemlerin birlikte kullanılması (MSc thesis). Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
  3. Chen, D., Zhang, L., Mathiopoulos, P.T., & Huamg, X. (2014). A methodology for automated segmentation and reconstruction of urban 3-D buildings from ALS point clouds. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(10), 4199-4217.
  4. Esposito S., Fallavollita P., Wahbeh W., Nardinocchi C., & Balsi M. (2014). Performance evaluation of UAV photogrammetric 3D reconstruction. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 4788–4791.
  5. Göktepe, A., Karabork, H., Yakar, M., Yildiz, F., & Baygul, E. (2009). 3D modeling of Sille Aya-i Eleni Church with laser technology. In 22nd CIPA Symposium – Digital Documentation, Interpretation & Presentation of Cultural Heritage, Kyoto.
  6. Güleç, A. (2007). Yersel fotogrametri yöntemi ile rölöve alım tekniğinin taç kapılarda uygulanışı Konya örnekleri (MSc thesis). Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
  7. Karabork, H., Yildiz, F., Yakar, M., Altuntas, C., & Karasaka L. (2007). Modeling and visualization using laser scanner in documentation of Cultural Heritage. XXI International CIPA Symposium, 01-06 October, Athens, Greece.
  8. Korumaz, A.G., Korumaz, M., Dulgerler, O.N., Karasaka, L., Yıldız, F., & Yakar, M. (2010). Evaluation of laser scanner performance in documentation of historical and architectural ruins, A case study in Konya. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38 (5), 361-366.
  9. Koyuncu, A. (2013). Sille'deki değişimin sosyolojik analizi. 1. Ulusal Sille Sempozyumu, 26-28 Eylül, Konya.
  10. Themistocleous K., Ioannides M., Agapiou A., & Hadjimitsis D.G. (2015). A new approach for documenting architectural cultural heritage: the case study of Asinou Church in Cyprus. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainability in Architecture and Cultural Heritage, 11-12 December, Limassol, Cyprus.
  11. Themistocleous, K., Agapiou, A., & Hadjimitsis, D. (2016). 3D documentation and Bim modeling of cultural heritage structures using UAVs: the case of the Foinikaria Church. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, 45-49.
  12. Uzar, M., Tunalıoğlu, N., Arıcan, D., & Arda, T. (2019). Yersel lazer tarama verisi ile elde edilen 3B modellerde filtreleme etkisinin araştırılması. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 34(4),1765-1775.
  13. Uzun, T., Spor, Y. (2019). Yersel lazer (Nokta bulut) tarama yöntemi ile rölöve-restitüsyon-restorasyon projesi hazırlama süreci ve bir örnek: Elazığ Harput Kale Hamamı. Tasarım Kuram, 15(28), 1-26.
  14. Vacanas, Y., Themistocleous, K., Agapiou, A., & Hadjimitsis, D. (2015). Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) technologies in infrastructure construction project management and delay and disruption analysis. Third International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment, 9535, 95350C.
  15. Varlık, A., Uray, F., & Metin, A. (2016). Sokak sağlıklaştırma projelerinde yersel lazer tarayıcı ile mimari rölöve alımı: Afyonkarahisar kentsel sit alanı örneği. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 8(2), 141-150.
  16. Xue, J., Fan, Y., Su, B., & Fuentes, S. (2019). Assessment of Canopy Vigor Information from Kiwifruit plants based on a Digital Surface Model from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle imagery. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 12(1), 165–171.
  17. Yakar, M., Mırdan, Ö. (2017). Tarihi eserlerin İnsansız Hava Aracı ile modellenmesinde karşılaşılan sorunlar. Geomatik Dergisi (Journal of Geomatics), 2(3), 118-125.
  18. Yildiz, F., Corumluoglu, O., Yakar, M., Karabork H. & Yilmaz, H.M. (1999). A photogrammetric investigation study on Ayai-Eleni Church (Sille-Konya). Third Turkish-German Joint Geodetics Days, 1, 265-274, 1-4 June, Istanbul.