SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Forecasting / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Comparative Analysis of XGBoost and Prophet Models for Monthly Dengue Cases Forecasting in Mayangone Township, Yangon, Myanmar: Projections for 2026

Zaw Lin Oo(Department of Atomic Energy)0000-0001-8132-3263
Theint Win Laı(Ascend International Preparatory College)0000-0002-4148-5812
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-14
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The 2026 projections indicate continued seasonal risk, emphasizing the need for proactive vector control measures in Mayangone Township.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dengue fever remains a significant public health challenge in Myanmar, with Yangon Region consistently reporting the highest number of cases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mayangone Township, an urban area in Yangon, experiences distinct seasonal outbreaks, predominantly during the rainy season (June–August), driven by increased Aedes mosquito breeding following monsoon rainfall.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The 2026 projections indicate continued seasonal risk, emphasizing the need for proactive vector control measures in Mayangone Township.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Dengue forecasting · XGBoost · Prophet

Abstract

Dengue fever remains a significant public health challenge in Myanmar, with Yangon Region consistently reporting the highest number of cases. Mayangone Township, an urban area in Yangon, experiences distinct seasonal outbreaks, predominantly during the rainy season (June–August), driven by increased Aedes mosquito breeding following monsoon rainfall. Accurate forecasting is vital for early warning and effective vector control. This study conducted a comparative analysis of XGBoost (gradient boosting machine learning) and Prophet (additive time series model) for predicting monthly dengue cases in Mayangone Township. Yearly national and regional dengue statistics were used to derive monthly incidence estimates for the township from January 2022 to December 2025, integrated with meteorological variables including rainfall, temperature, and humidity. XGBoost utilized engineered features such as cyclical time encodings, lagged cases, and rainy season indices, while Prophet incorporated the same variables with multiplicative seasonality. Models were evaluated using time series cross-validation with R², MAE, RMSE, and MAPE metrics. Both models produced similar annual forecasts for 2026 (XGBoost: 254.62 cases; Prophet: 252.70 cases). Prophet demonstrated superior predictive performance (R² = 0.9869, MAE = 1.92, RMSE = 2.50, MAPE = 9.54%) compared to XGBoost. Rainfall was identified as the most influential predictor in both models. Prophet projected a higher concentration of cases (66.3%) during the rainy season. The findings suggest Prophet is more accurate for forecasting, while XGBoost offers better interpretability of climatic drivers. The 2026 projections indicate continued seasonal risk, emphasizing the need for proactive vector control measures in Mayangone Township.

🔖

Cite This Article

Oo, Z. L., Laı, T. W. (2026). Comparative Analysis of XGBoost and Prophet Models for Monthly Dengue Cases Forecasting in Mayangone Township, Yangon, Myanmar: Projections for 2026. Turkish Journal of Forecasting, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.34110/forecasting.1923517

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Alduchov, O. A., & Eskridge, R. E. (1996). Improved Magnus form approximation of saturation vapor pressure. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 35(4), 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035 2.0.CO;2
  2. Allard, R. (1998). Use of time-series analysis in infectious disease surveillance. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 76(4), 327–333.
  3. Bhatt, S., Gething, P. W., Brady, O. J., Messina, J. P., Farlow, A. W., Moyes, C. L., Drake, J. M., Brownstein, J. S., Hoen, A. G., Sankoh, O., Myers, M. F., George, D. B., Jaenisch, T., Wint, G. R. W., Simmons, C. P., Scott, T. W., Farrar, J. J., & Hay, S. I. (2013). The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature, 496(7446), 504–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12060
  4. Brady, O. J., Gething, P. W., Bhatt, S., Messina, J. P., Brownstein, J. S., Hoen, A. G., Moyes, C. L., Farlow, A. W., Scott, T. W., & Hay, S. I. (2012). Refining the global spatial limits of dengue virus transmission by evidence-based consensus. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 6(8), e1760. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001760
  5. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785-794). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
  6. Focks, D. A., Haile, D. G., Daniels, E., & Mount, G. A. (1993). Dynamic life table model for Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): Analysis of the literature and model development. Journal of Medical Entomology, 30(6), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/30.6.1003
  7. Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
  8. Guzman, M. G., & Harris, E. (2015). Dengue. The Lancet, 385(9966), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60272-9
  9. Kesorn, K., Ongruk, P., Chompoosri, J., Phumee, A., Thavara, U., Tawatsin, A., & Siriyasatien, P. (2020). A development of a dengue forecasting model using Prophet in Thailand. PeerJ, 8, e10232. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10232
  10. Ministry of Immigration and Population. (2015). The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census: Yangon Region Report. Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
  11. Ministry of Health and Sports, Republic of the Union of Myanmar. (2016). National strategic plan for dengue prevention and control 2016–2020. Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
  12. Mordecai, E. A., Caldwell, J. M., Grossman, M. K., Lippi, C. A., Johnson, L. R., Neira, M., Rohr, J. R., Ryan, S. J., Savage, V., Shocket, M. S., Sippy, R., Stewart Ibarra, A. M., Thomas, M. B., & Villena, O. (2019). Thermal biology of mosquito-borne disease. Ecology Letters, 22(10), 1690–1708. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13335
  13. Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Choulga, M., Darras, S., De Rosnay, P., Jarlan, L., Martens, B., Piles, M., Rodríguez-Fernández, N., Schepers, D., & Thépaut, J. N. (2021). ERA5-Land: A state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications. Earth System Science Data, 13(9), 4349–4383. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021
  14. Ong, J., Liu, X., Rajarethinam, J., Yap, G., Ho, D., & Ng, L. C. (2022). A systematic review of dengue forecasting models: Current status and future directions. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 16(4), e0010321. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010321
  15. Oo, P. M., Wai, K. T., Harries, A. D., Shewade, H. D., Oo, T., Thi, A., & Lin, Z. (2017). The burden of dengue, source reduction measures, and serotype patterns in Myanmar, 2011 to 2015. Tropical Medicine and Health, 45, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-017-0075-5
  16. Shepard, D. S., Undurraga, E. A., & Halasa, Y. A. (2016). Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10(2), e0004315. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004315
  17. Taylor, S. J., & Letham, B. (2018). Forecasting at scale. The American Statistician, 72(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1380080
  18. Thu, H. M., Lowry, K., Myint, T. T., Shwe, T. N., Han, A. M., Khin, K. K., Thant, K. Z., Thein, S., & Aaskov, J. (2004). Myanmar dengue outbreak associated with displacement of serotypes 2, 3, and 4 by dengue 1. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10(4), 593–597. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1004.030216
  19. World Health Organization. (1997). Dengue haemorrhagic fever: Diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control (2nd ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization.
  20. World Health Organization. (2023). Dengue and severe dengue (Fact sheet). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dengue-and-severe-dengue
  21. World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia. (2022). Dengue situation in the South-East Asia Region. https://www.who.int/southeastasia/health-topics/dengue-and-severe-dengue
  22. Zaw, W., Lin, Z., Ko Ko, J., Rotejanaprasert, C., Pantanilla, N., Ebener, S., & Maude, R. J. (2023). Dengue in Myanmar: Spatiotemporal epidemiology, association with climate and short-term prediction. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 17(6), e0011331. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011331