SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Bioscience and Collections / 2025 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Regional Extinction of Three Game Birds (Family: Phasianidae) in İstanbul Before the Founding of the Turkish Republic

Süreyya İsfendiyaroğlu(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY-CERRAHPASA, INSTITUTE OF GRADUATE PROGRAMS, FOREST ENGINEERING (DR))0000-0001-9463-0158
Ömral Ünsal Özkoç(CANKIRI KARATEKIN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SCIENCE, DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY)0000-0002-5918-8664
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-08-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The findings indicate that intensive hunting and the live bird trade exerted pressure on these small and vulnerable populations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study examines the regional extinction processes of three game bird species—Black Grouse (Lyrurus tetrix), Gray Partridge (Perdix perdix), and Black Francolin (Francolinus francolinus)—whose local populations were documented in pre-Republican İstanbul.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: For each species, historical observations were compiled, and these data were organized chronologically to illustrate the species’ distribution, rarity trends and the reported sightings within İstanbul.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The findings indicate that intensive hunting and the live bird trade exerted pressure on these small and vulnerable populations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gamebirds · Hunting · Historical Ornithology

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the regional extinction processes of three game bird species—Black Grouse (Lyrurus tetrix), Gray Partridge (Perdix perdix), and Black Francolin (Francolinus francolinus)—whose local populations were documented in pre-Republican İstanbul. By situating İstanbul’s biodiversity loss within a historical context, this study aims to offer insights into contemporary conservation policies. Materials and Methods: For each species, historical observations were compiled, and these data were organized chronologically to illustrate the species’ distribution, rarity trends and the reported sightings within İstanbul. Records supporting the presence of species in İstanbul and its environs were compared against their natural distribution ranges. This comparison assessed whether the populations in İstanbul were naturally established native populations or introduced ones. Results: Belonging to the Phasianidae family, these birds were not only subjects of naturalistic observation during the Ottoman period but also integral to hunting traditions, culinary culture, and economic life. Travel journals and naturalists’ articles indicate that these species were observed, hunted, and consumed in the vicinity of İstanbul between the 17th and 19th centuries. Conclusion: The findings indicate that intensive hunting and the live bird trade exerted pressure on these small and vulnerable populations. Even though their habitats remained largely intact, these species eventually disappeared from the region.

🔖

Cite This Article

İsfendiyaroğlu, S., Özkoç, Ö. Ü. (2025). Regional Extinction of Three Game Birds (Family: Phasianidae) in İstanbul Before the Founding of the Turkish Republic. Turkish Journal of Bioscience and Collections, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.26650/tjbc.1714291

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Alléon, C. A. (1880). Catalogue des oiseaux observés aux environs de Constantinople. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, 5, 80– 116. google scholar
  2. Baer, J. G. (1942). Alphonse Mathey Dupraz [1862-1942], Bulletin de la Société Neuchâteloise des Sciences Naturelles. Band: 67. google scholar
  3. Baudier, M. (1635). The History of the Imperial Estate of the Grand Seigneurs, London. google scholar
  4. Bauer, W., Heiversen, O. V., Hodge, M. & Martens, J. (1969). Catalogus Faunae Graeciae (ed. A. Kanelhs). Pars II. Aves. — Thessaloniki, Greece. google scholar
  5. Baytop, T. (2002). İstanbul Florası Araştırmaları. Eren Yayınları. google scholar
  6. Belon, P. (1555). L’histoire de la nature des oyseaux, avec leurs descrip- tions, & naïfs portraicts retirez du naturel. Paris: Gilles Corrozet; p. 69. google scholar
  7. Boev, Z. (1988). Pyrvi dokozatelstva za cyscestvyvaneto na tetreva (Tetrao tetrix [L.]) (Aves, Tetraonidae) v Bulgarija. Acta Zool. Bulg. 36, 72-77, Sofya (in Bulgarian). google scholar
  8. Boyla, K. A., Kirwan, G. M., Demirci, B., Welch, H., Özen, M., Castell, P. & Marlow, T. (2025). Türkiye Kuşlarının Doğa Tarihi. https:// keremaliboyla.github.io/turkiye-kuslari/ google scholar
  9. Braun, F. (1903). Ornithologisches aus Konstantinopel. Ornithologische Monatsberichte, 11, 20–21, 38–39, 65–69, 145–151. google scholar
  10. de Tchihatchef, P. (1864). Le Bosphore et Constantinople avec perspectives des pays limitrophes. Th. Morgand. google scholar
  11. Elwes, H. J. & Buckley, T. E. (1870) A list of the birds of Turkey. Ibis (II) 6: 59-77, 327-341. google scholar
  12. Evliyâ Çelebi. (2014). Evliyâ Çelebi Seyahatnâmesi (1. Kitap). Yapı Kredi Yayınları. google scholar
  13. Furtun, Ö. L., Erciyas Yavuz, K. Karataş, A. (Ed.). (2021). Trakuş Türkiye’nin Kuşları. Türkiye İstanbul, İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları. google scholar
  14. Gill, F., Donsker, D. & Rasmussen, P. (Eds) (2025). IOC World Bird List (v15.1). (https://www.worldbirdnames.org/). google scholar
  15. Gökyay, O. Ş. (1978). Ziyafet Sofraları (Mevaidü’n-nefais fî kavâidi’l mecâlis). Tercüman 1001 Temel Eser. google scholar
  16. İsfendiyaroğlu, S., Karataş, A., Arslangündoğdu, Z. & Özkoç, Ö. Ü. (2022). İstanbul’un Kuşları (The Birds of İstanbul), İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kültür Yayınları, 936 pg. google scholar
  17. Işın, P. M. (2009). Osmanlı Mutfağında Av Etleri. Acta Turcica, 1(1), 451–456. google scholar
  18. Kasparek, M. (1990). Zum Vorkommen einiger in der Türkei seltener Voge- larten. Bonner zoologische Beiträge, 41, 181- 202. google scholar
  19. Kuban, D. (1973). Osmanlılar Çağında Boğaziçi yerleşmesi in Pamay B. (Ed.) İstanbul Boğazı ve çevresi sorunları simpozyumu, İstanbul, Çevre Koruma Ve Yeşillendirme Derneği. google scholar
  20. Kuban, D. (1996). İstanbul Bir Kent Tarihi–Bizantion Konstantinopolis İstanbul, Türkiye Eknomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı. google scholar
  21. Kumerloeve, H. (1986). Domenico Sestini (1750–1832): Aus der Frühzeit zoologischer Forschung im Bosporus-Raum (Türkei). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 88/89, 345-350. google scholar
  22. Kumerloeve, H. (1961). Zur Kenntnis der Avifauna Kleinasiens. Bonner zoologische Beiträge, 12, 1–318. google scholar
  23. Landerer, X. (1858) Mitteilungen aus Griechenland. III. Uber die Jagd. - Korrespondenzblatt des Zoologisch-Mineralogischen Vereins in Regensburg, 12, 197-198. google scholar
  24. Leverkühn, P. (1904). Notice Biographique Sur Le Comte Amedee Alleon. Ornis-Journal of the International Ornithological Committee, 12, 573-581. google scholar
  25. Mathey-Dupraz, A. (1923). Notes ornithologiques de la région du Bosphore. Ornithologische Beobachter, 20, 24–27. google scholar
  26. Reiser, O. (1904). Zur Kenntnis der Vogelwelt von Konstantinopel. Or- nithologisches Jahrbuch, 15, 153-156. google scholar
  27. Rigler, L. (1852). Die Türkei und deren Bewohner in ihren naturhis- torischen, physiologischen und pathologischen Verhältnissen vom Standpunkte Constantinopel’s. Wien. google scholar
  28. Sestini, D. (1785). Opuscoli del Signor Abate Domenico Sestini (Vol. 4). Firenze. google scholar
  29. Şengör, A. M. C. (2019). Önsöz. In Tchihatchef P. İstanbul ve Boğaziçi. İşbankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul. google scholar
  30. Türkömer, D. (2019) Avcı Prenses Zeyneb Halim ile Sohbetler. Yapı Kredi Yayınları. google scholar