SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Biodiversity / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Genetic variation in Zfy final intron region on Y-chromosome of Canis aureus, Canis lupus and Vulpes vulpes and sex-determination for samples of three canid species

Canis aureus, Canis lupus ve Vulpes vulpes’in Y–kromozomu’ndaki Zfy final intron bölgesi’nde genetik varyasyon ve üç kanid türünün örnekleri için cinsiyet tayini

Ömer Fikret Gürkan(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8002-1554
Osman İbiş(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5000-7882
Servet Özcan(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9914-8843
Doğa Can Tez(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5317-0826
Mohammad Moradi(Zanjan University)0000-0003-2920-2274
Coşkun Tez(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-6816-7443
Pages
1–13
Publication Date
2023-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In phylogenetic tree, the Canis species were clustered together and the Vulpes species were grouped in basale position and this was compatible with previous studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The proportion of females and males in the wild can be a result of past ecological impacts on mammalian populations, and it can offer valuable insights into the evolutionary history, demographics, and behavior of mammalian species.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When sex-determination testing was performed on 109 canid samples using a specific primer pair for the Zfx and Zfy genes, two specific DNA bands were detected in males while one DNA band was detected in females.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In phylogenetic tree, the Canis species were clustered together and the Vulpes species were grouped in basale position and this was compatible with previous studies.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Canis aureus · C. lupus · Iran

Abstract

The proportion of females and males in the wild can be a result of past ecological impacts on mammalian populations, and it can offer valuable insights into the evolutionary history, demographics, and behavior of mammalian species. We aimed to determine sex of road-killed samples belonging to three canid species (Canis aureus, C. lupus and Vulpes vulpes from Türkiye, and V. vulpes from Iran), and to reveal whether there was genetic variation within and among three species by sequencing the Zfy final intron region on Y–chromosome. When sex-determination testing was performed on 109 canid samples using a specific primer pair for the Zfx and Zfy genes, two specific DNA bands were detected in males while one DNA band was detected in females. The ratio of males was relatively lower than females. This indicated that there were clearly differences between females and males in terms of the band patterns. We also sequenced partially the Zfy final intron region for V. vulpes, C. aureus and C. lupus; 539 bp, 546 bp and 562 bp, respectively. When analyzed together the partial Zfy sequences, there was no variation among the sequences of each canid species and no haplotype was shared among three species. No phylogeographic structure was observed for each species throughout the sampling areas due to the partial Zfy final intron region highly being conserved. This might be resulted from gene flow due to an extensive male-biased dispersal presumably have homogenized the genetic variation in the Y–chromosome throughout the distributional areas of the canid species. In phylogenetic tree, the Canis species were clustered together and the Vulpes species were grouped in basale position and this was compatible with previous studies.

Özet

Doğada dişi ve erkeklerin oranı, memeli popülasyonları üzerindeki geçmiş ekolojik etkilerin bir sonucu olabilir ve memeli türlerinin evrimsel tarihi, demografisi ve davranışları hakkında değerli bilgiler sağlayabilir. Üç kanid türüne (Türkiye'den Canis aureus, C. lupus ve Vulpes vulpes ve İran'dan V. vulpes) ait karayollarında ölü bulunmuş örneklerin cinsiyetini belirlemeyi ve Y–kromozomu üzerindeki Zfy final intron bölgesinin dizi analizini yaparak üç tür içinde ve arasında genetik varyasyon olup olmadığını ortaya çıkarmayı amaçladık. Zfx ve Zfy genleri için spesifik bir primer çifti kullanılarak 109 kanid örneğinde cinsiyet belirleme testi yapıldığında, erkeklerde iki spesifik DNA bandı, dişilerde ise bir DNA bandı tespit edildi. Erkeklerin oranı dişilere göre nispeten daha düşüktü. Bu sonuç, bant desenleri açısından dişiler ve erkekler arasında açıkça farklılıklar olduğunu gösterdi. V. vulpes, C. aureus ve C. lupus için kısmi olarak Zfy final intron bölgesinin dizi analizini de gerçekleştirdik; türler için dizi uzunluğu sırasıyla 539 bç, 546 bç ve 562 bç’idi. Kısmi olarak elde edilen Zfy dizileri birlikte analiz edildiğinde, her kanid türünün dizileri arasında herhangi bir varyasyon yoktu ve üç tür arasında hiçbir haplotip paylaşılmadı. Kısmi dizilenen Zfy final intron bölgesi, yüksek oranda korunduğu için türlerin örnekleme alanları boyunca her bir tür için filocoğrafik yapı gözlemlenmemiştir. Bu sonuç, kanid türlerinin dağılış alanları boyunca Y kromozomu’ndaki genetik varyasyonu muhtemelen homojenleştirmiş olan geniş bir erkek tabanlı dağılımı nedeniyle gen akışından kaynaklanmış olabilir. Filogenetik ağaçta, Canis türleri bir arada kümelenmiş olup Vulpes türleri bazal pozisyonda gruplanmıştır. Bu sonuç, daha önceki çalışmalarla uyumludur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gürkan, Ö. F., İbiş, O., Özcan, S., Tez, D. C., Moradi, M., Tez, C. (2023). Genetic variation in Zfy final intron region on Y-chromosome of Canis aureus, Canis lupus and Vulpes vulpes and sex-determination for samples of three canid species. Turkish Journal of Biodiversity, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.38059/biodiversity.1253563

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (89)

  1. Aksöyek E, İbiş O, Özcan S, Moradi M, Tez C (2017). DNA barcoding of three species (Canis aureus, Canis lupus and Vulpes vulpes) of Canidae. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 28(5): 747-755. DOI: 10.1080/24701394.2016.1180512.
  2. Ashworth A, Skene B, Swift S, Lovell-Badge R (1990). Zfa is an expressed retroposon derived from an alternative transcript of the Zfx gene. The EMBO Journal 9(5): 1529-1534. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08271.x.
  3. Bo L, Wei Z, Xu Xiu S, XiaoLi Z (2013). Molecular sex identification of sable and stone marten. Russian Journal of Ecology 44(2): 137-141. DOI: 10.1134/S1067413613020148.
  4. Boonyaprakob U, Homsavart S, Noosud J, Tungtrakanpoung R (2017). Cloning and comparative analysis of zinc-finger protein gene on Y-chromosome (ZFY) between Thai Bangkaew dog and other Thai canids. Agriculture and Natural Resources 51(3): 212-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.anres.2016.12.007.
  5. Bardeleben C, Moore RL, Wayne RK (2005). A molecular phylogeny of the Canidae based on six nuclear loci. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37(3): 815-831. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.07.019.
  6. Bro-Jørgensen MH, Keighley X, Ahlgren H, Scharff-Olsen CH, Rosing-Asvid A, Dietz R, Ferguson SH, Gotfredsen AB, Jordan P, Glykou A, Lidén K, Olsen MT (2021). Genomic sex identification of ancient pinnipeds using the dog genome. Journal of Archaeological Science 127: 105321. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105321.
  7. Burton AC, Fisher JT, Adriaens P, Treweek J, Paetkau D, Wikstrom M, Callender A, Vardanyan R, Stepanyan A (2018). Density and distribution of a brown bear (Ursus arctos) population within the Caucasus biodiversity hotspot. Journal of Mammalogy 99(5): 1249-1260. DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyy081.
  8. Cathey JC, Bickham JW, Patton JC (1998). Introgressive hybridization and nonconcordant evolutionary history of maternal and paternal lineages in North American deer. Evolution 52(4): 1224-1229. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01850.x.
  9. Cavalli-Sforza LL (1998). The DNA revolution in population genetics. Trends in Genetics 14(2): 60-65. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(97)01327-9.
  10. Chang BH, Hewet-Emmett D, Li WH (1996). Male to female rate in higher primates estimated from intron sequences. Zoological Studies 35(1): 36-48.
  11. Curtis C, Stewart BS, Karl AA (2007). Sexing pinnipeds with ZFX and ZFYloci. Journal of Heredity 98(3): 280-285. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esm023.
  12. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012). jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9(8): 772. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2109.
  13. DeCandia A, Gaughran S, Caragiulo A, Amato G (2016). A novel molecular method for noninvasive sex identification of order Carnivora. Conservation Genetics Resources 8: 119-121. DOI: 10.1007/s12686-016-0525-z.
  14. Eggert LS, Eggert JA, Woodruff DF (2003). Estimating population sizes for elusive animals: the forest elephants of Kakum National Park, Ghana. Molecular Ecology 12(6): 1389-1402. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01822.x.
  15. Ellis N, Goodfellow PN (1989). The mammalian pseudoautosomal region. Trends in Genetics 5(12): 406-410. DOI: 10.1016/0168-9525(89)90199-6.
  16. Fadakar D, Rezaei HR, Hosseini M, Ilanloo SS, Zamani W (2014). Detecting domestic dog in diet of leopard using DNA tools. Environmental Resources Research 2(1): 15-20. DOI: 10.22069/IJERR.2014.1679.
  17. Farhadinia MS, Farahmand H, Gavashelishvili A, Kaboli M, Karami M, Khalili B, Montazamy S (2015). Molecular and craniological analysis of leopard, Panthera pardus (Carnivora: Felidae) in Iran: support for a monophyletic clade in Western Asia. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 114(4): 721-736. DOI: 10.1111/bij.12473.
  18. Felsenstein J (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39(4):783-791.
  19. Fernando P, Melnick DJ (2001). Molecular sexing eutherian mammals. Molecular Ecology Notes 1(4): 350-353. DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-8278.2001.00112.x.
  20. Frati F, Hartl GB, Lovari S, Delibes M, Markov G (1998). Quaternary radiation and genetic structure of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in the Mediterranean Basin, as revealed by allozymes and mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Zoology 245(1): 43–51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00070.x.
  21. Galov A, Fabbri E, Caniglia R, Arbanasić H, Lapalombella S, Florijančić T, Bošković I, Galaverni M, Randi E (2015). First evidence of hybridization between golden jackal (Canis aureus) and domestic dog (Canis familiaris) as revealed by genetic markers. Royal Society Open Science 2(12): 150450. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150450.
  22. Gomerčić T, Sindičić M, Galov A, Arbanasić H, Kusak J, Kocijan I, Gomerčić MD, Huber D (2010). High genetic variability of the grey wolf (Canis lupus L.) population from Croatia as revealed by mitochondrial DNA control region sequences. Zoological Studies 49(6): 816-823.
  23. González S, Mannise N, Repetto L, Maldonado JE (2015). Sex determination of three Neotropical canids by high resolution melting analysis. Conservation Genetics Resources 7: 643-645. DOI: 10.1007/s12686-015-0466-y.
  24. Gündüz İ, Jaarola M, Tez C, Yeniyurt C, Polly PD, Searle JB (2007). Multigenic and morphometric differentiation of ground squirrels (Spermophilus, Scuiridae, Rodentia) in Turkey, with a description of a new species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43(3): 916-935. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.02.021.
  25. Hall TA (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editör and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95-98.
  26. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T (1985). Dating the human-ape split by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22(2): 160-174. DOI: 10.1007/BF02101694.
  27. Hassan-Beigi Y, Fernandes C, Farhadinia M, Montazami S (2014). Phylogeny and genetic diversity of caracal in Iran. Wildlife Middle East News 7(1): 6.
  28. Hellborg L, Gündüz İ, Jaarola M (2005). Analysis of sex-linked sequences supports a new mammal species in Europe. Molecular Ecology 14(7): 2025-2031. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02559.x.
  29. Hirata D, Abramov AV, Baryshnikov GF, Masuda R (2014). Mitochondrial DNA haplogrouping of the brown bear, Ursus arctos (Carnivora: Ursidae) in Asia, based on a newly developed APLP analysis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 111(3): 627-635. DOI: 10.1111/bij.12219.
  30. Hong YJ, Lee H, Kim KS, Min M-S (2020). Phylogenetic relationships between different raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) populations based on four nuclear and Y genes. Genes & Genomics 42: 1075-1085. DOI:10.1007/s13258-020-00972-2.
  31. Huang W, Chang BH, Gu X, Hewett-Emmett D, Li W (1997). Sex differences in mutation rate in higher primates estimated from AMG intron sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 44(4): 463-465. DOI: 10.1007/pl00006166.
  32. Hutchins M, Kleiman DG, Geist V, McDade MC (Eds) (2003). Grzimek’s Animal Life Encyclopedia. 2nd edit., vols.12-16, Mammals I–V, Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group.
  33. Inoue T, Nonaka N, Mizuno A, Morishima Y, Sato H, Katakura K, Oku Y (2007). Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Northern Japan. Zoological Science 24(12): 1178-1186. DOI: 10.2108/zsj.24.1178.
  34. İbiş O, Tez C, Özcan S (2014). Phylogenetic status of the Turkish red fox (Vulpes vulpes), based on partial sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Vertebrate Zoology 64(2): 273-284. DOI: 10.3897/vz.64.e31495.
  35. İbiş O, Aksöyek E, Özcan S, Tez C (2015). A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of golden jackals (Canis aureus) (Canidae: Carnivora: Mammalia) from Turkey based on mitochondrial D–loop sequences. Vertebrate Zoology 65(3): 391-397. DOI: 10.3897/vz.65.e31532.
  36. İbiş O, Aksöyek E, Özcan S, Keten A, Yorulmaz T, Tez C (2016). Genetic analysis of the Turkish gray wolf (Canis lupus) based on partial mitochondrial DNA sequences. Vertebrate Zoology 66(3): 427-435. DOI: 10.3897/vz.66.e31575.
  37. Imani Harsini J, Rezaei HR, Naderi S, Moradi HV (2016). Genetic structure of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) based on D–loop region sequence of mitochondrial genome in central region of Iran. Journal of Natural Environment (Iranian Journal of Natural Resources) 69(4): 917-933. DOI: 10.22059/JNE.2017.118999.871.
  38. Imani Harsini J, Rezaei HR, Naderi S, Varasteh H (2017). Phylogenetic status and genetic diversity of corsac fox (Vulpes corsac) in Golestan Province, Iran. Turkish Journal of Zoology 41(2): 250-258. DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1509-52.
  39. Karami M, Hutterer R, Benda P, Siahsarvie R, Kryštufek B (2008). Annotated check-list of the mammals of Iran. Lynx (Praha) 39(1): 63-102.
  40. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012). Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28(12): 1647-1649. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199.
  41. Kimura M (1981). Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 78(1): 454-458. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.454.
  42. Koepfli KP, Pollinger J, Godinho R, Robinson J, Lea A, Hendricks S, Schweizer RM, Thalmann O, Silva P, Fan Z, Yurchenko AA, Dobrynin P, Makunin A, Cahill JA, Shapiro B, Alvares F, Brito JC, Geffen E, Leonard JA, Helgen KM, Johnson WE, O'Brien SJ, Van Valkenburgh B, Wayne RK (2015). Genome–wide evidence reveals that African and Eurasian golden jackals are distinct species. Current Biology 25(16): 2158-2165. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.060.
  43. Kryštufek B, Vohralik V (2009). Mammals of Turkey and Cyprus, Introduction, Checklist, Insectivora. University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia.
  44. Kumar S, Hedges SB (1998). A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature 392(6679): 917-920. DOI: 10.1038/31927.
  45. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016). MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(7): 1870-1874. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw054.
  46. Leite JV, Álvares F, Velo-Antón G, Brito JC, Godinho R (2015). Differentiation of North African foxes and population genetic dynamics in the desert–insights into the evolutionary history of two sister taxa, Vulpes rueppellii and Vulpes vulpes. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 15(4): 731-745. DOI:10.1007/s13127-015-0232-8.
  47. Li W-H (1997). Molecular evolution. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
  48. Li G, Davis BW, Raudsepp T, Pearks Wilkerson AJ, Mason VC, Ferguson-Smith M, O'Brien PC, Waters PD, Murphy WJ (2013). Comparative analysis of mammalian Y chromosomes illuminates ancestral structure and lineage–specific evolution. Genome Research 23(9): 1486-1495. DOI: 10.1101/gr.154286.112.
  49. Librado P, Rozas J (2009). DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25(11): 1451-1452. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187.
  50. Lucchini V, Fabbri E, Marucco F, Ricci S, Boitani L, Randi E (2002). Noninvasive molecular tracking of colonizing wolf (Canis lupus) packs in the western Italian Alps. Molecular Ecology 11(5): 857-868. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01489.x.
  51. Macdonald DW, Sillero-Zubiri C (2004). The Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, University of Oxford.
  52. Mardon G, Page DC (1989). The sex-determining region of the mouse Y chromosome encodes a protein with a highly acidic domain and 13 zinc fingers. Cell 56(5): 765-770. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90680-6.
  53. Marucco F, Pilgrim KL, Avanzinelli E, Schwartz MK, Rossi L (2022). Wolf dispersal patterns in the Italian Alps and implications for wildlife diseases spreading. Animals 12(10): 1260. DOI: 10.3390/ani12101260.
  54. McCulloch DL (2012). Molecular identification of north Texas urban predators Unpublished.
  55. Murakami M, Fujise H, Lee YS, Matsuba C, Fujitani H (2001). Reliable sex identification dogs by modified PCR/RFLP analysis. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 63(6): 679–681. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.63.679.
  56. Nagamine CM, Chan K, Kozak CA, Lau Y-F (1989). Chromosome mapping and expression of a putative testis-determining gene in mouse. Science 243(4887): 80–83. DOI: 10.1126/science.2563174.
  57. Nishida S, Goto M, Pastene LA, Kanda N, Koike H (2007). Phylogenetic relationships among cetaceans revealed by Y-chromosome sequences. Zoological Science 24: 723-732. DOI: 10.2108/zsj.24.723.
  58. Ortega J, Franco MR, Adams BA, Ralls K, Maldonado JE (2004). A reliable, non-invasive method for sex determination in the endangered San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica) and other canids. Conservation Genetics 5(5): 715-718. DOI: 10.1007/s10592-004-1862-0.
  59. Page DC, Mosher R, Simpson EM, Fisher EMC, Mardon G, Pollack J, McGillivray B, Chapelle A, Brown LG (1987). The sex–determining region of the human Y chromosome encodes a finger protein. Cell 51(6): 1091-1104. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90595-2.
  60. Pagès M, Maudet C, Bellemain E, Taberlet P, Hughes S, Hänni C (2009). A system for sex determination from degraded DNA: a useful tool for palaeogenetics and conservation genetics of ursids. Conservation Genetics 10: 897-907. DOI: 10.1007/s10592-008-9650-x.
  61. Rando HM, Wadlington WH, Johnson JL, Stutchman JT, Trut LN, Farré M, Kukekova AV (2019). The red fox Y–chromosome in comparative context. Genes (Basel) 10(6): 409. DOI: 10.3390/genes10060409.
  62. Rutledge LY, Patterson BR, White BN (2010). Analysis of Canis mitochondrial DNA demonstrates high concordance between the control region and ATPase genes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 215. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-215.
  63. Shami K (2002). Evaluating the change in distribution of the eastern timber wolf (Canis lycaon) using the Y-chromosome. Masters Thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton: Ontario, Canada.
  64. Shaw CN, Wilson PJ, White BN (2003). A reliable molecular method of gender determination for mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 84(1): 123-128. DOI: 10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084 2.0.CO;2.
  65. Shimmin LC, Chang BHJ, Li WH (1993a). Male driven evolution of DNA sequences. Nature 362: 745-747. DOI: 10.1038/362745a0.
  66. Shimmin LC, Chang BH-J, Hewett-Emmett D, Li W-H (1993b). Potential problems estimating the male-to-female mutation rate ratio from DNA sequence data. Journal of Molecular Evolution 37(2): 160-166. DOI: 10.1007/BF02407351.
  67. Slattery JP, O'Brien SJ (1998). Patterns of Y and X chromosome DNA sequence divergence during the Felidae radiation. Genetics 148(3): 1245-1255. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/148.3.1245.
  68. Slattery JP, Murphy JW, O’Brien JS (2000). Patterns of diversity among SINE elements isolated from three Y–chromosome genes in Carnivores. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17(5): 825-829. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026361.
  69. Statham MJ, Turner PD, O’Reilly C (2007). Molecular sex identification of five mustelid species. Zoological Studies 46(5): 600-608.
  70. Statham MJ, Murdoch J, Janecka J, Aubry KB, Edwards CJ, Soulsbury CD, Berry O, Wang Z, Harrison D, Pearch M, Tomsett L, Chupasko J, Sacks BN (2014). Range-wide multilocus phylogeography of the red fox reveals ancient continental divergence, minimal genomic exchange and distinct demographic histories. Molecular Ecology 23(19): 4813-4830. DOI: 10.1111/mec.12898.
  71. Strah R, Kunej T (2019). Molecular sexing assays in 114 mammalian species: In silico sequence reanalysis and a unified graphical visualization of diagnostic tests. Ecology and Evolution 9(8): 5018-5028. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5093.
  72. Tashima S, Kaneko Y, Anezaki Y, Baba M, Yachimori S, Abramov AV, Saveljev AP, Masuda R (2011). Identification and molecular variations of CAN-SINEs from the ZFYgene final intron of the Eurasian badgers (genus Meles). Mammal Study 36(1): 41-48. DOI: 10.3106/041.036.0105.
  73. Telcioğlu M, İbiş O, Aksöyek E, Özcan S, Moradi M, Gürkan ÖF, Tez C (2019). Genetic analysis of Iranian and Turkish red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) based on mitochondrial DNA (D–loop) sequences. Ethology Ecology & Evolution 31(6): 568-582. DOI: 10.1080/03949370.2019.1639079.
  74. Tsubouchi A, Fukui D, Ueda M, Tada K, Toyoshima S, Takami K, Tsujimoto T, Uraguchi K, Raichev E, Kaneko Y, Tsunoda H, Masuda R (2012). Comparative molecular phylogeny and evolution of sex chromosome DNA sequences in the family Canidae (Mammalia: Carnivora). Zoological Science 29(3): 151-161. DOI: 10.2108/zsj.29.151.
  75. Vila C, Amorim IR, Leonard JA, Posada D, Castroviejo J, Petrucci-Fonseca F, Crandall KA, Ellegren H, Wayne RK (1999). Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography and population history of the grey wolf Canis lupus. Molecular Ecology 8(12): 2089-2103. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00825.x.
  76. Viranta S, Atickem, A, Werdelin L, Stenseth NC (2017). Rediscovering a forgotten canid species. BMC Zoology 2: 6. DOI: 10.1186/s40850-017-0015-0.
  77. Wayne RK, Geffen E, Girman DJ, Koepfli KP, Lau LM, Marshall CR (1997). Molecular systematics of the Canidae. Systematic Biology 46(4): 622-653. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/46.4.622.
  78. Werhahn G, Senn H, Kaden J, Joshi J, Bhattarai S, Kusi N, Sillero-Zubiri C, Macdonald DW (2017). Phylogenetic evidence for the ancient Himalayan wolf: towards a clarification of its taxonomic status based on genetic sampling from western Nepal. Royal Society Open Science 4(6): 170186. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170186.
  79. Werhahn G, Senn H, Ghazali M, Karmacharya D, Sherchan AM, Joshi J, Kusi N, López-Bao JV, Rosen T, Kachel S, Sillero-Zubiri C, Macdonald DW (2018). The unique genetic adaptation of the Himalayan wolf to highaltitudes and consequences for conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation 16: e00455. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00455.
  80. Wheeldon TJ, Rutledge LY, Patterson BR, White BN, Wilson PJ (2013). Y-chromosome evidence supports asymmetric dog introgression into eastern coyotes. Ecology and Evolution 3(9): 3005-3020. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.693.
  81. Williams CL, Blejwas K, Johnston JJ, Jaeger MM (2003). A coyote in sheep's clothing: predator identification from saliva. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31(4): 926-932.
  82. Wilson DE, Reeder DM (2005). Mammal Species of the World. Smithsonian Instution press, Washington, USA.
  83. Wilson PJ, Rutledge LY, Wheeldon TJ, Patterson BR, White BN (2012). Y-chromosome evidence supports widespread signatures of three-species Canis hybridization in eastern North America. Ecology and Evolution 2(9): 2325-2332. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.301.
  84. Xu X, Wei K, Zhang W-P, Lin L, Wang X-F, Shen F-J, Zhang L, Zhang Z-H, Yue B-S (2007). A novel method for sex determination of giant panda. Annales Zoologici Fennici 44(6): 401-404.
  85. Yannic G, Statham MJ, Denoyelle L, Guillaume Szor G, Qulaut GQ, Sacks BN, Lecomte N (2017). Investigating the ancestry of putative hybrids: are arctic fox and red fox hybridizing? Polar Biology 40: 2055-2062. DOI: 10.1007/s00300-017-2126-z.
  86. Yusefi GH, Faizolahi K, Darvish J, Safi K, Brito JC (2019). The species diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the terrestrial mammals of Iran. Journal of Mammalogy 100(1): 55-71. DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyz002.
  87. Yu JN, Han SH, Kim BH, Kryukov AP, Kim S, Lee BY, Kwak M (2012). Insights into Korean red fox (Vulpes vulpes) based on mitochondrial cytochrome b sequence variation in East Asia. Zoological Science 29(11): 753-760. DOI:10.2108/zsj.29.753.
  88. Zachos FE, Cirovic D, Kirschning J, Otto M, Hartl GB, Petersen B, Honnen A-C (2009). Genetic variability, differentiation, and founder effect in golden jackals (Canis aureus) from Serbia as revealed by mitochondrial DNA and nuclear microsatellite loci. Biochemical Genetics 47(3-4): 241-250. DOI: 10.1007/s10528-009-9221-y.
  89. Zalewski A, Jedrzejewski W, Jedrzejewska B (2004). Mobility and home range use by pine martens (Martes martes) in a Polish primeval forest. Ecoscience 11(1): 113-122. DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2004.11682815.