SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences / 2014 / Volume: 1

EFFECT OF GENDER-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND RETENTION OF SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS TAUGHT GEOMETRY USING PROBLEM SOLVING APPROACH

Abbas Muhammad Gumel
Habu Galadima
Pages
—
Publication Date
2014-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the findings, Mathematics Teachers are encouraged to use problem solving approach (polya model) in teaching Mathematics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the effect of gender related differences on Geometry Achievement and retention of senior secondary school students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 70 SS3 students were selected from about 9,540 students of Jigawa state using stratified random sampling techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the findings, Mathematics Teachers are encouraged to use problem solving approach (polya model) in teaching Mathematics.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gender related difference · achievement · retention

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of gender related differences on Geometry Achievement and retention of senior secondary school students. A pretest-posttest experimental control group research design was used. A total of 70 SS3 students were selected from about 9,540 students of Jigawa state using stratified random sampling techniques. Both male and female group were treated using problem solving approach. The instruments used for data collection were Researchers Made Test (RMT), Geometry Achievement Test (GAT) and Geometry Retention-Test (GRT). Data collected were analyzed using t-test statistic. Finding statistically showed the existence of significant difference between male and female students ’performance in Geometry Achievement Test, while there is no significant difference in male and female performance in Geometry Retention-Test. Based on the findings, Mathematics Teachers are encouraged to use problem solving approach (polya model) in teaching Mathematics.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gumel, A. M., Galadima, H. (2014). EFFECT OF GENDER-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND RETENTION OF SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS TAUGHT GEOMETRY USING PROBLEM SOLVING APPROACH. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, Volume: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1550568

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Abbas, M. G (2008). The effect of problem solving Approach on Achievement and Retention of Geometrical concepts among senior secondary school students. Unpublished M.ed Thesis. A.B.U. Zaria. Abiam, P.O and Odok, J.K (2006). Factors on Students Achievement in Different Branches of Secondary School Mathematics. Journal of Education and Technology 1(1), 161 – 168. Adeleke, M.A. (2007). Gender Disparity in Mathematical Performance Reviewed: can Training in problem solving bring difference between boys and girls?Essays in education Vol. 21 retrieved from www.use-educ/eassys/vol/21/2007/adeleke Adetula, L.O. (1988). Teaching to improve students problem solving abilities. African Mathematics series 2(1). Akuizuilo, E. (1993). Research Methodology and Statistics. Nuel Centi Publishers. Capital Teritory. Awang. H, and Noor, A.I (nd). Difference in Mathematics learning in Malaysia, retrieved on 6/26/11 www.lea.ni/fileadmin/user_upload/rc2006/IEA_program Batista, M.T. (1990). Spatial Visualization and gender difference in high school geometry. Journal of research in Mathematics education 21 (1) 47 – 60 Bolaji, C. (1999). Effectiveness of Problem solving strategies for teaching Algebraic word problems in junior secondary schools. ZAJES: Zaria Journal of Education Studies 3(1), 93 – 99. Casey, M.B, Nuttail, R.L and Pezari’s, L. (2001). Spatial – mechanical reasoning skills versus Mathematics self confidence as mediators of gender differences on Mathematics subset using cross-national gender-based items. Journal for research in Mathematics 32(1) 28–57.
  2. Davis, M (1979). The effectiveness of guided inquiry/discovery approach in an elementary school science curricular an abstract Int, pp 416. Fennema, F.H. and Sharma, J.A. (1978). Sex-related Differences in Mathematics achievement and related factors. A further study, journal study, journal for research in Mathematics education 9(3), 189-203.
  3. Ibrahim, M.O. (1998). Level of Geometrical thinking of Nigeria Senior Secondary school students. Unpublished M.ed thesis A.B.U Zaria. Inekwe, I.O and Hassan A.A. (2002). Relationship Between visual perception of geometric shapes and achievement of students in secondary school, Educational review, Sokoto, Usman Danfodio University Kajuru, Y.K. (1995). The development and Assessment of Teachers Guide on the Teaching of Geometric concepts in the Junior Secondary School unpublished Ph.D thesis A.B.U Zaria. Lassa, P.N (1986). Problems and Prospects of Mathematics Teaching and Learning in African Schools. A paper presented at the 2nd Pan African congress at University of Jos, Nigeria. Manger, T. (1996). Gender Differences in Mathematical Achievement at the Norwegian Elementary school level. Psychology Abstract 83(3). Mulli, V.S. (1998). Education Achievement and Sex–Discrimination (Do national assessment of Education progress). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.(NCTM)(2000). Principles and Standards School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM National Population Commission (NPC 2006).
  4. Nigeria. Nicole, M.E, Janet, S.H, Marcia, C.L (2010). Cross-Sectional Patterns of Gender Difference in Mathematics. A Meta Analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 136(1) 103 – 121. Retrieved on 26/6/2011. from http://www.sciencedaily.com/news/mind-brain/gender-difference/
  5. Obodo, G.C. (1997). Principles and Practices of Mathematics Education in Nigeria. Enugu State University of Technology Enugu. Polya, G. (1962). Mathematical Discovery on Understanding, Learning and Teaching problem Solving (Vol.1) New York, Willey.