SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences / 2014 / Volume: 1

STUDENTS’ TALK DURING COLLABORATIVE GROUP DISCUSSION

Mustafa Cansız
Nurcan Cansız
Pages
—
Publication Date
2014-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The potential factors which may lead to reasoning were also explored.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to explore the types of talk occurring in small group discussions about digestive system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twenty two seven-graders worked on digestive system in small groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The potential factors which may lead to reasoning were also explored.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:students · Discussion

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the types of talk occurring in small group discussions about digestive system. Twenty two seven-graders worked on digestive system in small groups. In order to study these particular group's interactions and how they constructed meaning as they discussed digestion, field notes, transcripts of small-group discussions and group interviews were analyzed qualitatively. The results revealed that three types of talk (exploratory, cumulative and disputational) were observed in each group in varying amounts. The comparative analysis among groups revealed that students’ engaged in exploratory talk showed explicit and more sound reasoning than students’ engaged in disputational or cumulative talk. The potential factors which may lead to reasoning were also explored.

🔖

Cite This Article

Cansız, M., Cansız, N. (2014). STUDENTS’ TALK DURING COLLABORATIVE GROUP DISCUSSION. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, Volume: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1550538

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Dawes, L. (2004). Talk and learning in classroom science. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 677–695.
  2. Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., & Pell, T. (2009). Group work and whole-class teaching with 11- to 14-year-olds compared. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 119–140.
  3. Galton, M. J., & Williamson, J. (1992). Group work in the primary classroom. Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Incorporated. Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups’ ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 341–368.
  4. Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359–377.
  5. Mercer, N. (2008). Talk and the development of reasoning and understanding. Human Development, 51(1), 90–100.
  6. Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359–377.
  7. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111.
  8. Resnick, L. B., Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2010). How (well structured) talk builds the mind. Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development, 163–194.
  9. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes(Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).