PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ IMAGES OF PHYSICIST AND PHYSICS COURSE

Key Findings & Data:A total of 69 students, who were studying in primary science teaching at the Education Faculty of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University in Turkey.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:More than half of the participants’ images are that physics course is difficult and most of them have negative attitudes towards physics course.    

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Physicist · physics course · image

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the pre-service science teachers’ images of physicist and physics course. A total of 69 students, who were studying in primary science teaching at the Education Faculty of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University in Turkey. The data were collected using Word Association Test. Response words with the same meaning were classified under the most frequently repeated words. Words less than two times and those words that could not be associated were considered as irrelevant and were excluded. After contents have been analyzed, the frequency of the response words has been calculated and categorized. Participants’ associations of the term physicist were arranged into four categories. Participants’ associations of the term physics course were arranged into six categories. According to results, most of the participants related to personal character of physicist. More than half of the participants’ images are that physics course is difficult and most of them have negative attitudes towards physics course.    

Keywords

Physicist physics course image word association test

🔖

Cite This Article

Çil, E., Yanmaz, D., Akyüz, S. Ş., İri, F. G., Kar, H. (2014). PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ IMAGES OF PHYSICIST AND PHYSICS COURSE. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, Volume: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1550522

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

Angell, C., Guttersrud, Ø., Henriksen, E.K., & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, But Fun. Science Education, 88, 683-706.
Bahar, M., Johnstone, A.H. & Sutcliffe, R.G. (1999). Investigation of students' cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33(3), 134-141.
Carlone, H.B. (2003). Innovative science within and against a culture of “achievement”. Science Education, 87, 307-328.
Daskolia, M., Flogaitis, E. & Papageorgiou, E. (2006). Kindergarten teachers’ conceptual framework on the ozone layer depletion. Exploring the associative meanings of a global environmental issue. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 168-178.
Gussarsky, E. & Gorodetsky, M. (1990). On the Concept On the Concept “Chemical Equilibrium: The Associative Framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 197-204.
Korur, F. (2001). The Effects of Teachers Characteristics on High School Students’ Physics Achievement, Motivation and Attitudes. Unpublished Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara,
Turkey. Korur, F. & Eryılmaz, A. (2009). High School Students’ Perceptions about Effects of Teachers’ Characteristics on Their Physics Achievement. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(3), 733-761.
Lederman, N.G. (1993). Introduction: Summary of research in science education. Science Education, 77, 465-559.
Osborne, J., Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-467.
Sato, M. & James, P. (1999)."Nature" and "environment" as perceived by university students and their supervisors. International Journal of Environmental Education and Information, 18(2), 165-172.
Torkar, G. & Bajd, B. (2006). Trainee teachers’ ideas about endangered birds. Journal of Biological Education, 41(1), 5-8.