Journals / The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 2

A PRACTICAL DILEMMA: HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS' PHYSICS-RELATED PERSONAL EPISTEMOLOGY

Pages
—
Publication Date
2015-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future implications and directions are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This case study explores students’ physics-related personal epistemologies in school science practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Analysis of transcripts yielded several themes which characterize students’ ideas about the scientific knowledge in their school science practice.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future implications and directions are discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Personal epistemology · case study · science practices

Abstract

This case study explores students’ physics-related personal epistemologies in school science practices. The school science practices of nine eleventh grade students in a physics class were taped over six weeks. The students were also interviewed to find out their ideas on the nature of scientific knowledge after each school science practices. Analysis of transcripts yielded several themes which characterize students’ ideas about the scientific knowledge in their school science practice. The findings show that students believe that scientific data should be accurate; yet, while they collect data, they can make mistakes that do not change the conclusion of experiments. Traditional, formulation-based, physics instruction might have led students to view physics knowledge as unchanging and isolated pieces of facts, and physics problems as having one single answer. Future implications and directions are discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Alpaslan, M. M., Yalvac, B. (2015). A PRACTICAL DILEMMA: HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS' PHYSICS-RELATED PERSONAL EPISTEMOLOGY. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, Volume: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1550456

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 113-163.
  2. Elby, A. & Hammer, D. (2010). Epistemological resources and framing: A cognitive framework for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students’ epistemologies. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 409-434).New York: Cambridge Press.
  3. Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity, and epistemic practice. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.) Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 99-117). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  4. Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634– 656.