Five prospective teachers were asked to prepare a lesson plan concerning solubility topic and others prepared a lesson plan concerning the change of states topic .
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explored the nature of the integration of the three components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): 1) Knowledge of the Chemistry Curriculum, 2) Knowledge of the Instructional Strategies and Representations, 3) Knowledge of the Assessment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was designed as a case study and data were collected by means of lesson plans and it was performed with 8 prospective chemistry teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Five prospective teachers were asked to prepare a lesson plan concerning solubility topic and others prepared a lesson plan concerning the change of states topic .
This study explored the nature of the integration of the three components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): 1) Knowledge of the Chemistry Curriculum, 2) Knowledge of the Instructional Strategies and Representations, 3) Knowledge of the Assessment. This study was conducted in the context of the teaching graphs about solubility , and change of states topics of eight prospective chemistry teachers who were attending to chemistry teacher training program of Faculty of Education. The study was designed as a case study and data were collected by means of lesson plans and it was performed with 8 prospective chemistry teachers. Five prospective teachers were asked to prepare a lesson plan concerning solubility topic and others prepared a lesson plan concerning the change of states topic .
Gültekin, C., Nakiboğlu, C. (2016). EXAMINATION OF PROSPECTIVE CHEMISTRY TEACHERS’ PEDAGOGIC CONTENT KNOWLEDGE CONCERNING GRAPHS ABOUT SOLUTIONS, SOLUBILITY, AND CHANGE OF STATES TOPICS. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, Volume: 4. https://ajindex.com/articles/1550381
Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H. (1997) Concerns and perceptions of beginning secondary science and mathematics teachers. Science Education, 81(1), 29-50.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (16.Baskı). Ankara:
Pegem A Yayıncılık. de Jong, O. (2000). How to teach the concept of heat of reaction: a study of prospective teachers’ initial idea. chemistry education. Research and Practice in Europe, 1(1), 91-96.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95- 132). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Özden, M. (2008). The effect of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: The case of teaching phases of matters. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 8(2), 611-645.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-15.
Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 99-110. T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, (2013). Ortaöğretim Kimya Dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) Öğretim Programı [online]. (19 Aralık 2013), http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretim-programlari/icerik/72
Usak, M. (2005). Prospective elementary science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge about fl owering plants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gazi University, Insitute of Educational Science Ankara.
Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673-695.
Van Driel, J. H., De Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). T e development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ PCK. Science Education, 86(4), 572-590.
Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri 8. Baskı, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.