SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 4

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF FAMILY BACKGROUND VARIABLES ON INNOVATION PERCEPTIONS OF ENGINEER AND TEACHER CANDIDATES

Mehmet Ali Çorlu
Emin Aydın
Pages
—
Publication Date
2016-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicate that 47% of the variation in the IIS is explained by the independent variables.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate the innovation perceptions of teacher candidates in the areas of mathematics, science and social sciences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data collection tools are the Turkish versions of the Individual Innovativeness Scale (IIS) and Big5 Scale for personality characteristics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicate that 47% of the variation in the IIS is explained by the independent variables.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Teacher education · innovativeness perception · personality characteristics

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the innovation perceptions of teacher candidates in the areas of mathematics, science and social sciences. The data collection tools are the Turkish versions of the Individual Innovativeness Scale (IIS) and Big5 Scale for personality characteristics. Multivariate linear regression is the main data analysis technique. Results indicate that 47% of the variation in the IIS is explained by the independent variables.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çorlu, M. A., Aydın, E. (2016). AN INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF FAMILY BACKGROUND VARIABLES ON INNOVATION PERCEPTIONS OF ENGINEER AND TEACHER CANDIDATES. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, Volume: 4. https://ajindex.com/articles/1550373

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Aydın, E & Çorlu, M.A. (2016). An investigation of the personality factors affecting innovation perceptions of mathematics, science and social sciences teacher candidates. International Conference on Education in Mathematics, Science & Technology (ICEMST). Bodrum. Turkey. Çorlu, M. A., & Corlu, M. S. (2012). Scientific inquiry based professional development models in teacher education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 514–521
  2. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011) Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Pagem Akademi (14. baskı). Erdogan, N., Corlu, M. S., & Capraro, R. M. (2013). Defining innovation literacy: Do robotics programs help students develop innovation literacy skills? International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 1-9.
  3. Fadel. C. (2008). 21st Century Skills: How can you prepare students for the new Global Economy? Downloaded at: http://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40756908.pdf. Downloaded in 10.04.2016.
  4. Kılıçer, K. ve Odabaşı, H.F. (2010). Bireysel yenilikçilik ölçeği (BYÖ): Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38, 150-164.
  5. Mathisen, G.E. & Bronnick, K.S. (2009). Creative self-efficacy: An intervention study. International Journal of Educational Research 48, 21–29
  6. Rosenberg, N. (2004). INNOVATION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH. OECD. Downloaded at: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/tourism/34267902.pdf. Downloaded in 10.04.2016.
  7. Schwab, K. (2015). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means and How to Respond. Foreign Affairs. December 12. Downloaded at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-12-12/fourth-industrial-revolution. Downloaded in 10.04.2016.
  8. Sung, S.Y and Choi, J.N. (2009). Do Big Five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(7), 941-956.
  9. Stajkovic, A.D. & Luthans, F., (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 124 (2), 240–261. Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknik Araştırma Kurumu (TÜBİTAK) (2004). Ulusal bilim ve teknoloji politikaları: 2003-2023 Strateji belgesi. [Downloaded at: http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files//vizyon2023/Vizyon2023_Strateji_Belgesi.pdf], Accessed: 25 Nisan 2016
  10. Wang, R. & Lin, C., 2012). Understanding innovation performance and its antecedents: A socio-cognitive model. J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 29 (2012) 210–225
  11. Aydın, E & Çorlu, M.A. (2016). An investigation of the personality factors affecting innovation perceptions of mathematics, science and social sciences teacher candidates. International Conference on Education in Mathematics, Science & Technology (ICEMST). Bodrum. Turkey. Çorlu, M. A., & Corlu, M. S. (2012). Scientific inquiry based professional development models in teacher education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 514–521
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011) Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Pagem Akademi (14. baskı). Erdogan, N., Corlu, M. S., & Capraro, R. M. (2013). Defining innovation literacy: Do robotics programs help students develop innovation literacy skills? International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 1-9.
  13. Fadel. C. (2008). 21st Century Skills: How can you prepare students for the new Global Economy? Downloaded at: http://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40756908.pdf. Downloaded in 10.04.2016.
  14. Kılıçer, K. ve Odabaşı, H.F. (2010). Bireysel yenilikçilik ölçeği (BYÖ): Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38, 150-164.
  15. Mathisen, G.E. & Bronnick, K.S. (2009). Creative self-efficacy: An intervention study. International Journal of Educational Research 48, 21–29
  16. Rosenberg, N. (2004). INNOVATION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH. OECD. Downloaded at: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/tourism/34267902.pdf. Downloaded in 10.04.2016.
  17. Schwab, K. (2015). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means and How to Respond. Foreign Affairs. December 12. Downloaded at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-12-12/fourth-industrial-revolution. Downloaded in 10.04.2016.
  18. Sung, S.Y and Choi, J.N. (2009). Do Big Five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(7), 941-956.
  19. Stajkovic, A.D. & Luthans, F., (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 124 (2), 240–261. Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknik Araştırma Kurumu (TÜBİTAK) (2004). Ulusal bilim ve teknoloji politikaları: 2003-2023 Strateji belgesi. [Downloaded at: http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files//vizyon2023/Vizyon2023_Strateji_Belgesi.pdf], Accessed: 25 Nisan 2016
  20. Wang, R. & Lin, C., 2012). Understanding innovation performance and its antecedents: A socio-cognitive model. J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 29 (2012) 210–225