SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 4

SIMPLE AND EFFICIENT BI-COLOR PATH FOLLOWING ROBOT CONTROL ALGORITHM TEACHING IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION

Mehtap Köse Ulukök
Burak Özyurtcu
Cem Gül
Özcan Demirel
Pages
—
Publication Date
2016-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper investigates the efficient and simple path following robot control algorithm development over two colored lines on same course simultaneously.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, bi-color path following robot control algorithm teaching is presented.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mostly, autonomous robots follow a path on black colored surfaces having white line or vice versa.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper investigates the efficient and simple path following robot control algorithm development over two colored lines on same course simultaneously.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:teaching methods · robot design · robot control

Abstract

In this study, bi-color path following robot control algorithm teaching is presented. Mostly, autonomous robots follow a path on black colored surfaces having white line or vice versa. Courses having different line colors are rarely used because of its difficulty in its implementation. Several algorithms or hardware designs are developed for the autonomous solution of path following robot problem. Two electrical engineering students are taught about robot control algorithm development through inquiry teaching approach. A novel algorithm is developed after this process. This paper investigates the efficient and simple path following robot control algorithm development over two colored lines on same course simultaneously.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ulukök, M. K., Özyurtcu, B., Gül, C., Demirel, Ö. (2016). SIMPLE AND EFFICIENT BI-COLOR PATH FOLLOWING ROBOT CONTROL ALGORITHM TEACHING IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, Volume: 4. https://ajindex.com/articles/1550354

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aceska, N. (2016). New science curriculum based on inquiry based learning- a model of modern educational system in Republic of Macedonia. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 2(1), 1-12.
  2. Demirel, M., & Turan, B. A. (2010). Probleme dayalı öğrenmenin başarıya, tutuma, bilişötesi farkındalık ve güdü düzeyine etkisi. Hacettepe üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi, 38(38) Demirel, Ö. (2009). Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri: Öğretme Sanatı. Pegem Akademi. Engin, M., & Engin, D. (2012, September). Path planning of line follower robot. In Education and Research Conference (EDERC), 2012 5th European DSP (pp. 1-5).
  3. IEEE. Erdem, M. (2002). Proje tabanlı öğrenme. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(22). Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2009). Active learning: An introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4), 1-5.
  4. Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education,90(3), 453-467.
  5. Gençoğlu, M. T., & Cebeci, M. (1999). Türkiye'de mühendislik eğitimi ve öneriler. Mühendislik-Mimarlık Eğitimi Sempozyumu, 73-80.
  6. Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International journal for the scholarship of teaching and learning, 3(2), 16. Hasan, K. M., Al-Nahid, A., Reza, K. J., Khatun, S., & Basar, M. R. (2013, April). Sensor based autonomous color line follower robot with obstacle avoidance. In Business Engineering and Industrial Applications Colloquium (BEIAC), 2013 IEEE (pp. 598-603).
  7. IEEE. Hasan, K. M., & Al Mamun, A. (2012, May). Implementation of autonomous line follower robot. In Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV), 2012 International Conference on (pp. 865-869).
  8. IEEE. Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. Reshaping the university: new relationships between research, scholarship and teaching, 67-78.
  9. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
  10. Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers' use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of research in science teaching, 44(9), 1318-1347.
  11. Mao, S. L., & Chang, C. Y. (1998). Impacts of an inquiry teaching method on earth science students' learning outcomes and attitudes at the secondary school level. PROCEEDINGS-NATIONAL SCIENCE COUNERDEM, M. Miura, M. (2016, February). STEM Project-Based Learning with Product Design Activities. In 2016 AAAS Annual Meeting (February 11-15, 2016). aaas. Sönmez, V. (2011). Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri. Anı Yayıncılık.