SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences / 2016 / Volume: 5

EVALUATION OF RESEARCH PROJECTS OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN AN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT USING TOPSIS METHOD

Ugur Ozcan
Ahmet Dogan
İsmet Soylemez
Pages
—
Publication Date
2016-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to determine the degree of importance of each research projects the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is used.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Evaluation of research projects of undergraduate students in an effective manner is important to rewarding student success in technical education at Engineering Departments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research project of undergraduate students evaluation is mainly concerned with evaluating a number of research projects and then to grade them for rewarding.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to determine the degree of importance of each research projects the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is used.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Technical education · evaluation of research projects · MCDM

Abstract

Evaluation of research projects of undergraduate students in an effective manner is important to rewarding student success in technical education at Engineering Departments. Research project of undergraduate students evaluation is mainly concerned with evaluating a number of research projects and then to grade them for rewarding. For this purpose, in this paper, an effective method for evaluating and to grade research projects of undergraduate students is proposed. A Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methodology to evaluate the research projects is suggested. Firstly, the criteria that will be used in the evaluation are determined and then those criteria are weighted in terms of their importance. In order to determine the degree of importance of each research projects the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is used.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ozcan, U., Dogan, A., Soylemez, İ. (2016). EVALUATION OF RESEARCH PROJECTS OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN AN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT USING TOPSIS METHOD. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, Volume: 5. https://ajindex.com/articles/1550332

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Coffin, M.A., & Taylor, B.W, (1996). Multiple criteria R&D project selection and scheduling using fuzzy logic. Computers & Operations Research, 23(3), 207–220.
  2. Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., Tikniouine, A., & Agouti, T. (2016). Application of an integrated multi‑criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection. SpringerPlus, 5, 263. Hsu, Y.G., Tzeng, G.H., & Shyu, J.Z. (2003). Fuzzy multiple criteria selection of government-sponsored frontier technology R&D projects. R&D Management, 33(5), 539–551.
  3. Huang, C.C., Chu, P.Y., & Chiang, Y.H. (2008). A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. Omega, 36(6), 1038–1052.
  4. Hwang, C.L., & Yoon, K., (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. In Springer, Heidelberg ISO/IEC 9126-1 (2001) Software Engineering-Product Quality—Part 1: Quality Model, International Organization for Standardization. Jayasinghe, U.W., Marsh, H.W., & Bond, N. (2006). A new reader trial approach to peer review in funding research grants: An Australian experiment. Scientometrics, 69(3), 591–606.
  5. Juznic, P., Peclin, S., Zaucer, M., Mandelj, T., Pusnik, M., & Demsar, F. (2010). Scientometric indicators: Peer-review, bibliometric methods and conflict of interests. Scientometrics, 85(2), 429–441.
  6. Khalili-Damghani, K., Sadi-Nezhad, S., & Tavana, M. (2013). Solving multi-period project selection problems with fuzzy goal programming based on TOPSIS and a fuzzy preference relation. Information Sciences, 252, 42–61.
  7. Linton, J.D., Walsh, S.T., & Morabito, J. (2002). Analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio. R&D Management, 32(2), 139–148.
  8. Mahmoodzadeh, S., Shahrabi, J., Pariazar, M., & Zaeri, M.S. (2007). Project selection by using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS technique. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 30, 333–338.
  9. Wang, J., & Hwang, W.L. (2007). A fuzzy set approach for R&D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model. Omega, 35(3), 247–257.