SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 7

TURKISH STUDENTS’ EXPERIENCES IN USING A COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING (CSCL) TOOL (VIRTUAL MATH TEAMS - VMT)

Gulgun Afacan Adanir
Pages
—
Publication Date
2017-08-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study also suggests which immediate actions should be taken to improve usability of the system. 

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to identify usability problems related to Virtual Math Teams (VMT) system, which is supporting online collaborative activities of learning groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the usability assessment, two major evaluations have been conducted.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study also suggests which immediate actions should be taken to improve usability of the system. 
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Computer supported collaborative learning · virtual math teams · usability

Abstract

This study aims to identify usability problems related to Virtual Math Teams (VMT) system, which is supporting online collaborative activities of learning groups. For the usability assessment, two major evaluations have been conducted. In the first evaluation, students filled the scale of framework for CSCL system Usability Evaluation including dimensions - Effectiveness, Efficiency, Collaborativity, Error Tolerance, Universal Accessibility, Satisfaction. The second evaluation considers students answers to open ended question related to system’s usability problems. These two approaches together released the usability problems related to VMT system. The problems identified are related to four major usability aspects: system design, file upload, process tracking/automated notification, and error prevention. This study also suggests which immediate actions should be taken to improve usability of the system. 

🔖

Cite This Article

Adanir, G. A. (2017). TURKISH STUDENTS’ EXPERIENCES IN USING A COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING (CSCL) TOOL (VIRTUAL MATH TEAMS - VMT). The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, Volume: 7. https://ajindex.com/articles/1550209

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning. Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, 1, 1-15.
  2. Eales, R. T., Hall, T., & Bannon, L. J. (2002, January). The motivation is the message: Comparing CSCL in different settings. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (pp. 310-317). International Society of the Learning Sciences. Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., Klobas, J., & Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 163-176.
  3. Janssen, J., Erkensa, G., Kanselaara, G., & Jaspersa, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49(4), 1037–1065.
  4. Huang, E. (2010). Identifying an effective framework for usability evaluation of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning System in Educational settings (Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology). Petropoulou, O., Altanis, I., Retalis, S., Nicolaou, C. A., Kannas, C., Vasiliadou, M., & Pattis, I. (2010). Building a tool to help teachers analyse learners’ interactions in a networked learning environment. Educational Media International, 47(3), 231-246.
  5. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supportedcollaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer(Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426).Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Wang, Q. (2009). Design and evaluation of a collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1138-1146.