Journals / Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Wage Theories and an Applicable Wage Model Proposal for Turkey's Labour Markets

Ücret Teorileri ve Türkiye İşgücü Piyasaları İçin Uygulanabilir Bir Ücret Modeli Önerisi

Pages
501–523
Publication Date
2016-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, if the labour markets would be accepted as two polarized blocks, surveying the economic and social dimensions of wages will be pertinent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Overall, if the labour markets would be accepted as two polarized blocks, surveying the economic and social dimensions of wages will be pertinent.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It has become a confliction between employers and employes, shuttered in this distinction, a fair regulation of wages for many economists were forced to detect new formulas.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:So far, in observance of the doctrinal explanation that it can be obtained is a multi-dimensional and multifunctional wage model on the basis of four actors in the labour market can be reached will contribute to the balance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Wage Theories · Elements of Wage · Efficiency Wage Models

Abstract

Overall, if the labour markets would be accepted as two polarized blocks, surveying the economic and social dimensions of wages will be pertinent. It has become a confliction between employers and employes, shuttered in this distinction, a fair regulation of wages for many economists were forced to detect new formulas. However, in the labour economics literature such secondary actors employes and employers; have to accept the existence of government and unions. These secondary actors acquirement from labour markets seat the economic balance on a quartet trivet. So far, in observance of the doctrinal explanation that it can be obtained is a multi-dimensional and multifunctional wage model on the basis of four actors in the labour market can be reached will contribute to the balance.

Özet

Uluslararası emek piyasalarının genel olarak iki blok halinde kutuplaştığı kabul edilirse; ücretlerin iktisadi ve sosyal boyutlarının ele alınması isabetli olacaktır. Çalışanlarla işverenler arasında adeta bir mücadele haline bürünen bu ayrım, ücretlerin adil bir şekilde düzenlenmesi konusunda pek çok iktisatçıyı yeni formüller geliştirmeye itmiştir. Ne var ki, çalışma ekonomisi literatüründe tali aktörler olarak emek piyasalarında çalışan ve işverenler dışında devlet ve sendikaların varlığını kabul etmek gerekir. Bu tali aktörlerin emek piyasalarından paylarını almaları, ekonominin dengesini dörtlü bir saç ayağına oturtmaktadır. Bugüne kadar ortaya konulmuş olan doktriner açıklamalar ışığında, oluşabilecek çok boyutlu ve çok fonksiyonlu bir ücret modeli, emek piyasalarındaki bu dört aktör bazında ulaşılabilecek bir dengeye katkıda bulunacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, M. V., TIĞLI, A. (2016). Wage Theories and an Applicable Wage Model Proposal for Turkey's Labour Markets. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 501–523. https://ajindex.com/articles/154812

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Biçerli, M.K. (2013). Çalışma Ekonomisi. İstanbul:
  2. Beta Publication. Billikopf, G. (2001). Incentive Pay (Pay for Performance). The Regends of the University of California. http://nature.berkeley.edu/ucce50/aglabor/7labor/08.htm (Accessed Date: October 13, 2014)
  3. Calistri, A.D. & Galbraith, J.K. (2001). Wage Flexibility and Unemployment: A Panel Data Analysis of OECD Countries. UTIP Working Paper, http://utip.gov.utexas.edu/papers/utip_18.pdf (Accessed Date: May 02, 2014)
  4. Ceylan, Z. (2009). Performansa Dayalı Ücretlendirme Modelleri ve Türkiye Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. Sayıştay Dergisi, (74-75), 45-72.
  5. Clark, J.B. (1906). The Distribution of Wealth: A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits. London: The Macmillan Company. Chamberlain, N.W. & Cullen, D.E. (1971). The Labor Sector. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. Daly, M.C., Hobijn, B. & Ni, T. (2013). The Path of Wage Growth and Unemployment. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Research, http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/files/el2013-20.pdf (Accessed Date: May 19, 2014)
  6. Davidson, J. (1899). The Bargain Theory of Wages. The Economic Journal, 9(34), 229-232.
  7. Demirgil, H. (2010). Okun Yasası'nın Türkiye için Geçerliliğine Dair Ampirik Bir Çalışma. Akdeniz University Alanya Entrepreneur Faculty Issue. 2(2). 139- 151. Ehrenberg, R.G. & Smith, R.S. (2012). Modern Labor Economics - Theory and Public Policy. Boston: Pearson Education Inc. Eraslan, M.T. & Tozlu, A. (2011). Kamu Yönetiminde Performansa Dayalı Ücret Sistemi. Sayıştay Dergisi, (81), 33-61.
  8. Flatau, P. (2002). Hicks' The Theory of Wages: Its Place in the History of Neoclassical Distribution Theory. Murdoch University, Department of Economics, Working Papers, http://www.murdoch.edu.au/Schoolof./187.pdf (Accessed Date: September 29, 2014)
  9. Gürsel, S., Uysal, G. & Acar, A. (2013). Wage Rigidity and Informality in the Labor Market in Turkey. BETAM Research Brief, 13(152). http://www.irisfrance.org/docs/kfm_docs/observatoire-turquie/researchbrief152.pdf (Accessed Date: May 01, 2014)
  10. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. & Thaler, R.H. (1986). Fairness as a Constraint on Prpfit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 728-741.
  11. Kargı, B. (2013). Ücret Yapışkanlığı Hipotezinin Test Edilmesi: Türkiye'de Asgari Ücret ve Büyüme Üzerine Zaman Serileri Analizi (2005-2012). Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, (2), 183-210.
  12. Katz, L.F. (1986). Efficiency Wage Theories: A Partial Evaluation. NBER Working Papers, (1), 235-290. Kaytancı,