Journals / Çocuk Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Meatal stenosis and penile adhesions after neonatal circumcision

Yenidoğan sünnetinden sonra mea darlığı ve penil yapışıklıklar

Pages
91–93
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To continiue to this study on the older children after the toilette training, with a better comminication, will help to claim this conclusion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The objective of this study is to document the incidence and treatment of meatal stenosis and prepucial adhesions after neonatal circumcision Material and Method: 1050 newborns have been circumcised between 2004 and 2007 in our hospital by the Gomco Clamp technique.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: 630 of the 1050 children were admitted to our clinic in the last 6 months for either routine pediatrician exam or other purposes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To continiue to this study on the older children after the toilette training, with a better comminication, will help to claim this conclusion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Penis · Doku yapışmaları · Sünnet

Abstract

Aim: The objective of this study is to document the incidence and treatment of meatal stenosis and prepucial adhesions after neonatal circumcision Material and Method: 1050 newborns have been circumcised between 2004 and 2007 in our hospital by the Gomco Clamp technique. Among these, the ones who come to our pediatrics clinic in the last six months, were evaluated either for a meatal stenosis or penile adhesions by a single pediatric surgeon. Results: 630 of the 1050 children were admitted to our clinic in the last 6 months for either routine pediatrician exam or other purposes. Among these, there were 2 meatal stenosis, 97 prepucial mucosal adhesions and 2 skin bridges. Meatoplasty was performed for one of the meatal stenosis, and the other one was resolved after dilation programme. 67 of the penile adhesions were younger than 1 year old, 29 of the adhesions were between 1 and 2 years of age, and there was only one adhesion after 3 years. All of the mucosal adhesions were simply lysed manually. The skin bridges were cut surgically. Conclusion: Penile adhesions develop after newborn circumcision, they can easily be treated and they decrease with age. Meatal stenosis is not a common complication after newborn circumcison in the first three years of life. To continiue to this study on the older children after the toilette training, with a better comminication, will help to claim this conclusion.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı yenidoğan sünnetinden sonra görülebilen mea darlığı ve prepusyal yapışıkların sıklığı ve tedavisini irdelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Hastanemizde 2004-2007 yıllar ıarasında Gomco Klempi ile 1050 yenidoğan sünneti yapılmıştır. Bunlar arasından herhangi bir sebeple son 6 ay içerisinde pediatri polikliniğimize gelenler çocuk cerrahisi tarafından görülerek mea darlığı ve prepusyal yapışıklık açısından değerlendirilmişlerdir. Bulgular: 1050 bebeğin 630’u son 6 ay içerisinde polikliniğimize gelmiştir. Yapılan muayenelerinde 2 mea darlığı, 97 prepusyal yapışıklık ve 2 cilt köprüsü saptanmıştır. Mea darlıklarından birisine meatoplasti uygulanmış, diğeri dilatasyon programı ile gerilemiştir. Prepusyal yapışıklıkların 67’si bir yaş altında, 29’u 1-2 yaş arası ve yalnızca 1 tanesi 3 yaştan büyük saptanmıştır. Tüm mukozal yapışıklıklar kolayca manuel olarak açılmıştır. İki cilt köprüsü ise cerrahi olarak kesilerek düzeltilmiştir. Sonuç: Sünnet sonraı görülen mukozal yapışıklık sık görülen ve kolayca tedavi edilebilen bir durumdur. Mea darlığı, ilk üç yaş içerisinde, yenidoğan sünnetinden sonra görülen ender bir komplikasyondur. Ancak, işeme kontrolünü başladığı, çocukla daha iyi iletişimin kurulabildiği ileri yaşlarda bu çalışmanın devamını yapmak, daha net ve iddialı bir sonuca varmaya yardımcı olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EROĞLU, E., GÖKSEL, A. K., YÖRÜKALP, Ö. E., ÖZKAN, H. Ç., GÜLOĞLU, G., ÖZGENECİ, A. (2008). Meatal stenosis and penile adhesions after neonatal circumcision. Çocuk Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 91–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/154607

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ahmed A, Mbib NH, Dawam D, et al: Complications of traditional male circumcision. Ann Trop Paediatr 19:113-117, 1999 2. Ben Chaim J, Livne PM, Binyamini J, et al: Complications of circumcision in Israel: a one year multicenter survey. Isr Med Assoc J 7:368-370, 2005 3. Eroğlu E, Dayanıklı P, Şarman G, et al: Newborn Circumcision Using A Gomco Clamp. Journal of the Turkish Association of Pediatric Surgeons 19:31-34, 2005 4. Eroğlu E, Balcı S, Özkan VHC, et al: Does circumcision increase neonatal jaundice? Acta Paediatrica 97:1192-1193, 2008 5. Eroğlu E, Bastian O, Özkan HÇ, Yörükalp ÖE, Göksel AK: Buried penis after newborn circumcision. Journal of Urology (baskıda) 6. Gee WF, Ansell JS: Neonatal Circumcision: a ten year overview: with comparison of the Gomco clamp and the plastibell device. Pediatrics 58:824-827, 1976 7. Gracely-Kilgore KA: Penile adhesion: the hidden complication of circumcision. Nurse Pract 9:22-24, 1984 8. Horowitz M, Gershbein AB: Gomco circumcision: When is it safe? J Pediatr Surg 36:1047-1049, 2001 9. Lerman SE, Liao JC: Neonatal circumcision. Pediatr Clin North Am 48:1539-1557, 2001 10. Machmouchi M, Alkhotani: Is neonatal circumcision judicious? Eur J Pediatr Surg 17:66-69, 2007 11. Mahmoudi H: Evaluation of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision. Urol J 2:86-88, 2005 12. Okeke LI, Asinobi AA, Ikuerowo OS: Epidemiology of complications of male circumcision in Ibadan, Nigeria. BMC Urol 6:21, 2006 13. Palmer JS, Elder JS, Palmer LS: The use of betamethasone to manage the trapped penis following neonatal circumcision. J Urol 174:177-1578, 2005 14. Persad R, Sharma S, McTavish J, et al: Clinical presentation and pathophysiology of meatal stenosis following circumcision. Br J Urol 75:91-93, 1995 15. Ponsky LE, Ross JH, Knipper N, et al: Penile adhesions after neonatal circumcision. J Urol 164:495-496, 2000 16. Roberts JA: Neonatal circumcision: an end to the controversy? South Med J 89:167-171, 1996 17. Tokgos H, Polat F, Tan MO, et al: Histopathological evaluation of the preputium in preschool en primary school boys. Int Urol Nephrol 36:573-576, 2004 18. Upadhyay V, Hammodat HM, Pease PW: Post circumcision meatal stenosis: 12 years’ experience. NZ Med J 111:57-58, 1998 19. Van Howe RS: Incidence of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision in a primary care setting. Clinical Pediatrics 45:49-54, 2006 20. Yegane RA, Kheirollahi AR, Saehi NA, et al: Late complications of circumcision in Iran. Ped Surg Int 22:442-445, 20