SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ENT Updates / 2017 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of endoscopic examination and paranasal computed tomography findings in failed dacryocystorhinostomy patients

Dakriyosistorinostominin baflarısız olduğu hastalarda endoskopik inceleme ve paranazal bilgisayarlı tomografi bulgularının değerlendirilmesi

Emine ŞAKALAR GÜVEN
Hikmet BAŞMAK
Hüseyin GÜRSOY
Hamdi ÇAKLI
Pages
139–143
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Before the commencement of revision DCR, endoscopic examination and PNCT may provide valuable informationregarding the underlying etiology

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective:The aim of this study is to evaluate endoscopic andparanasal computed tomography (PNCT) findings in cases of faileddacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods:This study included 30 cases of failed DCR (18 females, 12males; mean age: 49.9±18.9 years) and 30 successful DCR patients (20females, 9 males; mean age: 56.3±15.9 years).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Before the commencement of revision DCR, endoscopic examination and PNCT may provide valuable informationregarding the underlying etiology
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective:The aim of this study is to evaluate endoscopic andparanasal computed tomography (PNCT) findings in cases of faileddacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Methods:This study included 30 cases of failed DCR (18 females, 12males; mean age: 49.9±18.9 years) and 30 successful DCR patients (20females, 9 males; mean age: 56.3±15.9 years). The reasons for the recurrence of the disease were evaluated using preoperative endoscopic examination and PNCT findings. Results: Endoscopic pathology was identified in 24 out of 30 failed cases(80%), while endoscopic pathology was identified in 12 out of 30 successful cases (40%) (p<0.05). PNCT revealed nasal pathology in 24 out of 30failed cases (80%), and in 15 out of 30 successful cases (50%) (p<0.05). Conclusion:Endonasal and sinonasal pathologies may be associatedwith DCR failure. Before the commencement of revision DCR, endoscopic examination and PNCT may provide valuable informationregarding the underlying etiology

Özet

Dakriyosistorinostominin başarısız olduğu hastalarda endoskopik inceleme ve paranazal bilgisayarlıtomografi bulgularının değerlendirilmesiAmaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı başarısız dakriyosistorinostomi (DSR) olgularında endoskopik inceleme ve paranazal bilgisayarlı tomografi(PNBT) bulgularını değerlendirmektir.Yöntem:Çalışma 30 başarısız olunmuş DSR hastası (yaş ortalaması:49.9±18.9; 18 kadın ve 12 erkek) ve 30 başarılı olunmuş DSR hastasını (yaş ortalaması: 56.3±15.9; 20 kadın ve 9 erkek) kapsamaktadır.Ameliyat öncesi endoskopik muayene ve PNBT bulguları kullanılarakhastalığın nüks etme nedenleri değerlendirildi. Bulgular:Otuz başarısız olgunun 24'ünde (%80), 30 başarılı olgununise 12'sinde (%40) endoskopik patoloji saptandı (p<0.05). PNBT ise 30başarısız olgunun 24'ünde (%80) ve 30 başarılı olgunun 15'inde (%50)nazal patolojiyi ortaya çıkardı (p<0.05). Sonuç:Endonazal ve sinonazal patolojiler DSR başarısızlığıyla ilişkili olabilir. DSR revizyonuna başlamadan önce endoskopik muayeneve PNBT altta yatan etiyoloji açısından değerli bilgiler sağlayabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜVEN, E. Ş., BAŞMAK, H., GÜRSOY, H., ÇAKLI, H. (2017). Evaluation of endoscopic examination and paranasal computed tomography findings in failed dacryocystorhinostomy patients. ENT Updates, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 139–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/154501

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ozkaya A, Gurcan Z, Ozusan S. Comparing pimary external dacryocystorhinostomy operations with or without silicone tube intubation. [Article in Turkish]. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;16:77-81
  2. Caldwell GW. Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct. NY Med J 1893;57:581-2
  3. Yakopson VS, Flanagan JC, Ahn D, Luo BP. Dacryocystorhinostomy: history, evolution and future directions. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2011;25:37-49
  4. Yigit O, Samanc>o¤lu M, Taskin U, Ceylan S, Eltutar K, Yener M. External and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in chronic dacryocystitis: comparison of results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264:879-85
  5. Rice DH. Endoscopik intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy results in four patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:1061
  6. Metson R, Woog JJ, Puliafito CA. Endoscopik laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 1994;104:269-74
  7. Konuk O, Kurtulmusoglu M, Knatova Z, Unal M. Unsuccessful lacrimal surgery: causative factors and results of surgical management in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmologica 2010;224:361- 6
  8. Onerci M. Dacryocystorhinostomy. Diagnosis and treatment of nasolacrimal canal obstructions. Rhinology 2002;40:49-65
  9. Karim R, Ghabrial R, Lynch TF, Tang B. A comparison of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Clinical Ophthalmology 2011;5: 979-89
  10. Balbaba M, Toplu Y, Ulas F. Association of nasolacrimal canal obstruction and nasal pathologies. [Article in Turkish]. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Ophthalmology 2013;22:5-9
  11. Piédrola Maroto D, Franco Sánchez J, Reyes Eldblom R, Monje Vega E, Conde Jiménez M, Ortiz Rueda M. Endonasal versus trans-canalicular endoscopic dacriocystorhinostomy using diode laser. Surgical techniques and outcomes. [Article in Spanish] Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2008;59:283-7
  12. Pittore B, Tan N, Salis G, Brennan PA, Puxeddu R. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy without stenting: results in 64 consecutive procedures. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2010;30:294- 8
  13. Hart RH, Powrie S, Rose GE. Primary external dacryocystorhinostomy. In: Cohen AJ, Mercandetti M, Brazzo BG, editors. The lacrimal system: diagnosis, management and treatment. New York, NY: Springer; 2006. p. 127-43
  14. Welham RA, Wulc AE. Management of unsuccessful lacrimal surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1987;71:152-7
  15. Saratziotis A, Emanuelli E. Osteoma of the medial wall of the maxillary sinus: a primary cause of nasola