SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

İhracata Dayalı Büyüme Hipotezi Türkiye İçin Geçerli Mi?

Burcu ÖZCAN
Oğuzhan ÖZÇELEBİ
Pages
1–14
Publication Date
2013-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results are in support of export-led growth hypothesis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is generally thought that export has a crucial role in the economic development processes of countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Furthermore, import is accepted to contribute to economic performance providing intermediate and capital goods necessary for export sectors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results are in support of export-led growth hypothesis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İhracata dayalı büyüme · ithalata dayalı büyüme · ticari serbestleşme

Abstract

It is generally thought that export has a crucial role in the economic development processes of countries. For instance, it is assumed that increasing level of export contributes to diffusion of technical knowledge. Furthermore, import is accepted to contribute to economic performance providing intermediate and capital goods necessary for export sectors. These ideas are called “export-led growth hypothesis” and “import-led growth hypothesis”, respectively. In this study, it is aimed to explore the relationships between industrial production index, export, import, and real exchange rate using Johansen co-integration method for Turkey over the period 2005(1)2011(11). The results are in support of export-led growth hypothesis.

Özet

Genellikle dış ticaretin ülkelerin iktisadi kalkınma süreçlerinde önemli bir role sahip olduğu düşünülmektedir. Örneğin, artan ihracat düzeyinin teknik bilgi düzeyinin yayılmasına yol açtığı varsayılmaktadır. Daha da ötesi, ithalatın da ihracat sektörü için gerekli olan ara ve sermaye mallarının teminini gerçekleştirerek ekonomik performansa katkıda bulunduğu kabul görmektedir. Bahsedilen bu fikirler sırasıyla “ihracata dayalı büyüme” ve “ithalata dayalı büyüme” hipotezleri şeklinde adlandırılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye için 2005(1)-2011(11) dönemi boyunca Johansen eşbütünleşme metodu kullanılarak ihracat, ithalat, sanayi üretim endeksi ve reel döviz kuru arasındaki ilişkiler irdelenmektedir. Sonuçlar, ihracata dayalı büyüme hipotezinin geçerliliği yönünde kanıtlar sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, B., ÖZÇELEBİ, O. (2013). İhracata Dayalı Büyüme Hipotezi Türkiye İçin Geçerli Mi?. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/15433

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ABUAL-FOUL, Bassam (2004), “Testing the export-led growth hypothesis: evidence from Jordan”, Applied Economics Letters, 11:6, 393-396.
  2. ADJAYE, John Asafu ve Debasish CHAKRABORTY (1999), “Export-led Growth and Import Compression: Further Time Series Evidence From LDCs”, Australian Economic Papers, 38(2), 164-175.
  3. AFXENTIOU, Panos ve Apostolos SERLETIS (2000), “Output Growth and Variability of Export and Import Growth: International Evidence from Granger Causality Tests”, The Developing Economies, XXXVIII-2, 141–63.
  4. ASTERIOU, Dimitrios. & Stephen G. HALL (2007). Applied Econometrics A Modern Approach using E-Views and Microfit, Palgrave MacMillan. AWOKUSE, Titus O. (2003), ”Is the export-led growth hypothesis valid for Canada?”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 36(1), 126-136.
  5. AWOKUSE, Titus O. (2008), “Trade Openness and Economic Growth: Is Growth Export-Led or import-Led?”, Applied Economics, 40,161–173.
  6. BAHMANI-OSKOOE, M. ve I. DOMAC (1995), “Export growth and economic growth in Turkey: evidence from cointegration analysis”, METU Studies in Development, 22, 67- 77. BALASSA, Bela (1978), “Exports and economic growth: Further evidence”, Journal of Development Economics, 5, 181-189.
  7. BALASSA, Bela (1985), “Exports, policy choices, and economic growth in developing countries after the 1973 oil shock”, Journal of Development Economics 4(1), 23- 35. BHAGWATI, Jagdish (1978), Anatomy and Consequences of Exchange Control Regimes: Liberalization Attempts and Consequences. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. BİLGİN, Cevat ve Ahmet ŞAHBAZ (2009), “Türkiye’de Büyüme ve İhracat Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkileri”, Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 8(1): 177-198.
  8. BROOKS, Chris (2008), Introductory Econometrics for Finance, Cambridge University Press.
  9. BOZOKLU, Şeref (2005), Banka Kredisi Aktarım Mekanizması: VAR Yaklaşımı, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi CHAUDHARY, Muhammad A., SHIRAZI, Nasim S. ve Munir A.S. CHOUDHARY (2007), “Trade Policy And Economic Growth In Bangladesh: A Revisit”, Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 45(1), 1-26.
  10. CHOW, Peter C.Y. (1987), “Causality between export growth and industrial development: empirical evidence from newly industrialized countries”, Journal of Development Economics, 28, 265–76.
  11. CHENERY, Hollis B. (1961), Comparative Advantage and Development Policy, American Economic Review, 51(1), 18-51.
  12. DAWSON, Philip J. (2006), “The export–income relationship and trade liberalisation in Bangladesh” Journal of Policy Mode