SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Samsun Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Determining The Relationship Between the Individual Innovation Levels of Midwifery Students and Their Attitudes Towards Artificial Intelligence

Ebelik Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Bireysel Yenilikçilik Düzeyleri ile Yapay Zekâya Yönelik Tutumları Arasındaki İlişkinin Belirlenmesi

Songül Kekil(GAZİANTEP İSLAM BİLİM VE TEKNOLOJİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-1713-7540
Şule Gökyıldız Sürücü(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0088-4219
Ebru Gözüyeşil(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9193-2182
Burcu Avcıbay Vurgeç(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2467-5101
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-09
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion and Recommendations: The research results showed that more than half of the students’ individual innovative characteristics were in the inquisitive category and that they had positive attitudes towards artificial intelligence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study was conducted to determine the relationship between the individual innovativeness levels of midwifery students and their attitudes towards artificial intelligence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with students studying in the Midwifery Department of the Faculty of Health Sciences at a state university. 250 volunteer students participated in the study, which constitutes 62% of the total student body.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion and Recommendations: The research results showed that more than half of the students’ individual innovative characteristics were in the inquisitive category and that they had positive attitudes towards artificial intelligence.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ebelik · Öğrenciler · Yapay Zekâ

Abstract

Aim: This study was conducted to determine the relationship between the individual innovativeness levels of midwifery students and their attitudes towards artificial intelligence. Method: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with students studying in the Midwifery Department of the Faculty of Health Sciences at a state university. 250 volunteer students participated in the study, which constitutes 62% of the total student body. Data were collected using a personal ınformation form, the General Attitude Towards Artificial Intelligence Scale, and the Individual Innovativeness Scale. The obtained data were evaluated using SPSS (Statistical Package of Social Science) 22.0 program. Results: A significant difference was found between the positive attitudes of students towards artificial intelligence according to their individual innovativeness categories (p<0.001). In the multiple comparison analysis, it was determined that students with innovative and pioneering characteristics had more positive attitudes than students with skeptical characteristics. A significant difference was also found in terms of negative attitudes (p=0.004). It was observed that traditional students had more negative attitudes than innovative students; skeptical and inquisitive students had more negative attitudes than innovative and pioneering students. Conclusion and Recommendations: The research results showed that more than half of the students’ individual innovative characteristics were in the inquisitive category and that they had positive attitudes towards artificial intelligence. It is recommended that these topics be included in the curriculum and discussion forums be created to increase midwifery students’ innovative perspectives and knowledge levels regarding artificial intelligence.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, ebelik bölümü öğrencilerinin bireysel yenilikçilik düzeyleri ile yapay zekâya yönelik tutumları arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel tipte olan araştırma, bir devlet üniversitesinin Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Ebelik Bölümünde öğrenim gören öğrenciler ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmaya 250 gönüllü öğrenci katılmış olup bu oran toplam öğrencilerin %62’sini oluşturmaktadır. Veriler, kişisel bilgi formu, Yapay Zekâya Yönelik Genel Tutum Ölçeği ve Bireysel Yenilikçilik Ölçeği ile toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS (Statistical Package of Social Science) 22.0 programı kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Öğrencilerin bireysel yenilikçilik kategorilerine göre yapay zekâya yönelik pozitif tutumları arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (p<0.001). Çoklu karşılaştırma analizinde, yenilikçi ve öncü özellikte olan öğrencilerin, kuşkucu özellikte olan öğrencilere göre daha olumlu tutumlara sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Negatif tutumlar açısından da anlamlı fark saptanmıştır (p=0.004). Gelenekçi öğrencilerin yenilikçi öğrencilere göre; kuşkucu ve sorgulayıcı öğrencilerin ise yenilikçi ve öncü öğrencilere göre daha fazla negatif tutuma sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuçlar ve Öneriler: Araştırma sonucunda öğrencilerin yarıdan fazlasının bireysel yenilikçilik özelliklerinin sorgulayıcı kategoride olduğu ve yapay zekâya yönelik pozitif tutumlarının olduğu görülmüştür. Ebelik öğrencilerinin yenilikçi bakış açıları ve yapay zekâya yönelik bilgi düzeylerinin artırılması için müfredatta bu konulara yer verilmesi ve tartışma ortamlarının oluşturulması önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kekil, S., Sürücü, Ş. G., Gözüyeşil, E., Vurgeç, B. A. (2026). Determining The Relationship Between the Individual Innovation Levels of Midwifery Students and Their Attitudes Towards Artificial Intelligence. Samsun Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1. https://doi.org/10.47115/jshs.1964694

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Alzahrani, L. (2023). Analyzing students' attitudes and behavior toward artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 11(6), 65–73.
  2. Atasoy, I., Özdemir, S. Ç., & Evli, M. (2023). Relationship between individual innovativeness and 21st century skills of nursing and midwifery students: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today, 126, 105830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105830
  3. Bergdahl, J., Latikka, R., Celuch, M., Savolainen, I., Mantere, E. S., Savela, N., & Oksanen, A. (2023). Self-determination and attitudes toward artificial intelligence: Cross-national and longitudinal perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 82, 102013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102013
  4. Bhuttah, T. M., Xusheng, Q., Abid, M. N., & Sharma, S. (2024). Enhancing student critical thinking and learning outcomes through innovative pedagogical approaches in higher education: The mediating role of inclusive leadership. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 24362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75429-2 Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students' voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
  5. Ergin, E., & Yücel, Ş. Ç. (2022). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin inovatif farkındalıkları ve yenilikçilik düzeyleri. Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal, 5(1), 62-71.
  6. Ertuğ, N., & Kaya, H. (2017). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin bireysel yenilikçilik profilleri ve yenilikçiliğin önündeki engellerin incelenmesi. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi, 14(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.5222/HEAD.2017.192
  7. Handayani, F., & Prahatmaja, N. (2024). The role of social media as a source of academic information for students. Record and Library Journal, 10(1), 103–111.
  8. Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00597.x
  9. Katsantonis, A., & Katsantonis, I. G. (2024). University students' attitudes toward artificial intelligence: An exploratory study of the cognitive, emotional, and behavioural dimensions of AI attitudes. Education Sciences, 14(9), 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090988
  10. Kaya, F., Aydin, F., Schepman, A., Rodway, P., Yetişensoy, O., & Demir Kaya, M. (2022). The roles of personality traits, AI anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes towards artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730
  11. Khakpaki, A. (2025). Advancements in artificial intelligence transforming medical education: a comprehensive overview. Medical education online, 30(1), 2542807.
  12. Kılıçer, K., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2010). Individual innovativeness scale (IS): The study of adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38, 150–164.
  13. Kranz, A., & Abele, H. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on midwifery education: A scoping review. Healthcare, 12(11), 1082. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12111082
  14. Kwon, K., & Kim, T. (2020). An integrative literature review of employee engagement and innovative behavior: Revisiting the JD-R model. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 100704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100704
  15. Liu, L., Liu, M., Lv, Z., Ma, F. Y., Mao, Y., & Liu, Y. (2024). The mediating and moderating role of nursing information competence between nurses' creative self-efficacy and innovation behavior in a specialized oncology hospital. BMC Nursing, 23(1), 698. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02329-4
  16. Oyekunle, D. O. T., Okwudili Matthew, U., Preston, D., & Boohene, D. (2024). Trust beyond technology algorithms: A theoretical exploration of consumer trust and behavior in technological consumption and AI projects. Journal of Computer and Communications, 12(6), 10–34.
  17. Pitts, G., Marcus, V., & Motamedi, S. (2025). Student perspectives on the benefits and risks of AI in education. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02198
  18. Poalelungi, D. G., Musat, C. L., Fulga, A., Neagu, M., Neagu, A. I., Piraianu, A. I., & Fulga, I. (2023). Advancing patient care: how artificial intelligence is transforming healthcare. Journal of personalized medicine, 13(8), 1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13081214.
  19. Polat, E. (2025). Artificial intelligence literacy, lifelong learning, and fear of innovation: Identification of profiles and relationships. Education and Information Technologies, 30(14), 20183–20214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13328-9
  20. Posit team (2025). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA. URL http://www.posit.co/.
  21. Sáez-Velasco, S., Alaguero-Rodríguez, M., Rodríguez-Cano, S., & Delgado-Benito, V. (2025). Students' attitudes towards AI and how they perceive the effectiveness of AI in designing video games. Sustainability, 17(7), 3096. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073096
  22. Saroyan, A. (2022). Fostering creativity and critical thinking in university teaching and learning: Considerations for academics and their professional learning (OECD Education Working Papers No. 280). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/09b1cb3b-en
  23. Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2020). Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 1, 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014 Sunay, Z., Ulutaş, Ü., & Yılmaz, A. N. (2021). Examination of the effect of individual innovation on entrepreneurship and problem solving skills in midwifery students. Anatolian Journal of Health Research, 2(1), 1–6.
  24. Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Cowling, M. (2023). An innovative tool for education: An adversarial dialogue system embedded with humor, empathy and culture. In 2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET) (pp. 163–166). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111260