Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

The new $8^{th}$ TNM staging system of lung cancer and its potential imaging interpretation pitfalls and limitations with CT image demonstrations

Pages
270–279
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is important for radiologists to understand the major changes introduced in the $8^{th}$ edition of TNM staging and to recognize the potential pitfalls and limitations of imaging interpretation to precisely classify the clinical stage of lung cancer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system approved by International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) to stage lung cancer was recently revised.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The latest revision is the $8^{th}$ edition published in January, 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is important for radiologists to understand the major changes introduced in the $8^{th}$ edition of TNM staging and to recognize the potential pitfalls and limitations of imaging interpretation to precisely classify the clinical stage of lung cancer.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system approved by International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) to stage lung cancer was recently revised. The latest revision is the $8^{th}$ edition published in January, 2017. This new edition made some important changes to the previous edition, including modification of the T classification based on 1 cm increment, downstage of T descriptor including endobronchial tumor disregarding its distance from carina (T2), merging total and partial atelectasis/pneumonitis into the same T category (T2), upstage diaphragmatic invasion to T4, new classification concept of adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma for pure and part-solid ground-glass nodules, and further division of extrathoracic metastasis into M1b and M1c based on the number and sites of extrathoracic metastases. Consensus is reached for debating situations not covered in the previous edition of staging system, such as the classification of pancoast tumor based on its invasion depth and staging tumors that extend directly across the fissure as T2a. Classification of multiple sites of pulmonary involvement, including multiple primary lung cancer, separate lung cancer nodules, multiple ground-glass or lepidic lesions, and consolidation, is also discussed. Even though the $8^{th}$ edition of the TNM lung staging system provides us with more precise classification based on prognostic analysis of each TNM descriptors, there are still some potential limitations and clinical situations that have not yet been clarified in terms of clinical staging by imaging. It is important for radiologists to understand the major changes introduced in the $8^{th}$ edition of TNM staging and to recognize the potential pitfalls and limitations of imaging interpretation to precisely classify the clinical stage of lung cancer.

🔖

Cite This Article

FENG, S. H., YANG, S. (2019). The new $8^{th}$ TNM staging system of lung cancer and its potential imaging interpretation pitfalls and limitations with CT image demonstrations. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 270–279. https://ajindex.com/articles/153773

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017; 67:7–30. [CrossRef] 2. Rami-Porta R, Bolejack V, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for the revisions of the T descriptors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2015; 10:990–1003. [CrossRef] 3. Brierley J, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. Eighth ed. Oxford, UK; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2017. [CrossRef] 4. Travis WD, Asamura H, Bankier AA, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for coding T categories for subsolid nodules and assessment of tumor size in part-solid tumors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11:1204–1223. [CrossRef] 5. Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Travis WD, Rusch VW. Lung cancer - major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017; 67:138–155. [CrossRef] 6. Detterbeck FC, Boff DJ, Kim AW, Tanoue LT. The eighth edition lung cancer stage classification. Chest 2017; 151:193–203. [CrossRef] 7. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Rami-Porta R, et al. Visceral pleural invasion: pathologic criteria and use of elastic stains: proposal for the $7^{th}$edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2008; 3:1384–1390. [CrossRef] 8. Amin MB. American Joint Committee on Cancer and American Cancer Society AJCC cancer staging manual. $8^{th}$Ed. Chicago IL: American Joint Committee on Cancer, Springer, 2017. 9. Asamura H, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The international association for the study of lung cancer lung cancer staging project: proposals for the revision of the N descriptors in the forthcoming $8^{th}$ edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2015; 10:1675–1684. [CrossRef] 10. Kay FU, Kandathil A, Batra K, Saboo SS, Abbara S, Rajiah P. Revisions to the Tumor, Node, Metastasis staging of lung cancer ($8^{th}$ edition): Rationale, radiologic findings and clinical implications. World J Radiol 2017; 9:269–279. [CrossRef] 11. Glazer GM, Gross BH, Quint LE, Francis IR, Bookstein FL, Orringer MB. Normal mediastinal lymph nodes: number and size according to American Thoracic Society mapping. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985; 144:261–265. [CrossRef] 12. Walker CM, Chung JH, Abbott GF, et al. Mediastinal lymph node staging: from noninvasive to surgical. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 1