SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of the Relative Efficiencies by the Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application in Turkey for the Provinces of Cultural Indicators

Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Göreli Etkinliklerin Karşılaştırılması: Türkiye’deki İllerin Kültürel Göstergelerine İlişkin Bir Uygulama

Algın
Didem OKURSOY
TEZSÜRÜCÜ
Pages
1–18
Publication Date
2015-10-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, 10 of the cultural indicators were selected as input variables and six of them were selected as output variables from TUIK data sources.According to result of analysis, effective and non-effective provinces were determined and possible suggestions were discussed to improve local cultural economies

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric method based on linear programming.
📊
Key Findings & Data:DEA aims to measure relative efficiencies of decision making units (DMU) that produces same sort of outputs by using similar inputs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, 10 of the cultural indicators were selected as input variables and six of them were selected as output variables from TUIK data sources.According to result of analysis, effective and non-effective provinces were determined and possible suggestions were discussed to improve local cultural economies
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Veri Zarflama Analizi · Kültürel Göstergeler · Kültür Ekonomisi

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric method based on linear programming. DEA aims to measure relative efficiencies of decision making units (DMU) that produces same sort of outputs by using similar inputs. DEA has a wide range of application in the both private and public sector. The purpose of this study is to evaluate relative efficiencies of provinces’ cultural economies by cultural indicators of provinces in Turkey. In this context, 10 of the cultural indicators were selected as input variables and six of them were selected as output variables from TUIK data sources.According to result of analysis, effective and non-effective provinces were determined and possible suggestions were discussed to improve local cultural economies

Özet

Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA), doğrusal programlama modeline dayalı parametrik olmayan bir analiz yöntemidir. Benzer girdileri kullanarak, aynı tür çıktıları üreten karar verme birimlerinin (KVB) göreli etkinliklerinin ölçülmesini amaçlamaktadır. VZA, kamudan özel sektöre kadar çok geniş bir uygulama alanına sahiptir. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin 81 iline ait kültürel göstergeler kullanılarak, illerin kültürel ekonomilerinin VZA ile göreli etkinliklerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu’nun (TUİK) yayınladığı kültürel göstergeler içerisinden on tanesi girdi, altı tanesi de çıktı değişkeni olarak VZA’ya dahil edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, etkin ve etkin olmayan iller belirlenerek, kültürel ekonomilerinin geliştirilebilmesi için olası iyileştirme önerileri tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Algın, A., OKURSOY, D., TEZSÜRÜCÜ, T. (2015). Comparison of the Relative Efficiencies by the Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application in Turkey for the Provinces of Cultural Indicators. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 1–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/15374

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. ATAN, M., ÖZGÜR, E., GÜLER, H. (2004), “ Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Analizler ve VZA ile İllerin gelişmişlik Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6/2, 25-42.
  2. BANKER, R.D., COOPER, W.W., SEIFORD, L.M., THRALL, R.M., ZHU, J. (2004), “Returns to Scale in Different DEA Models”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 154, pp. 345-362.
  3. BINA, V., CHANTEPIE, P., DEROIN, V., FRANK, G., KOMMEL, K., KOTÝNEK, J., ROBIN, P. (2012),
  4. ESSnet-Culture Final Report, Luxembourg: EU. CHANG, H.-C., TING, C.-T., LEE, M.-H. (2012). Evaluating the efficiency of cultural and creative ability of cities in Taiwan. 17th International Conference on Cultural Economics in Kyoto. Kyoto. CHARNES, A., COOPER, W.W., LEWIN, A.Y., SEIFORD, L. M. (1994), Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Application, Kluwer Academic Publisher,
  5. Boston, USA. CHARNES, A., COOPER, W.W., RHODES, E. (1978), “Measuring The Efficiency of Decision Making Units”, European Journal of Operation Research, Vol. 2, pp. 429-444.
  6. COELLI, T. (1996), “A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program”, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis CEPA Working Paper, 08/1996.
  7. COELLI, T.J., RAO D.S.P., O’DONNELL C.J., BATTESE G.E. (2005), An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivitiy Analysis, Springer, Second Edition,
  8. USA. COOK, W.D., SEIFORD, L.M. (2009), “Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) – Thirty Years On”, European Journal of Operational Research, 192, pp. 1–17.
  9. COOPER W.W., SEIFORD L.W., TONE K. (2000), Data Envelopment Analysis AComprehensive Text with Models, Application, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
  10. USA. COOPER, W.W., SEIFORD, L.M., ZHU, J. (2011), “Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis History, Models And Interpretations”, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 164, pp. 1-39. COOPER; W.W., SHANLING, L., SEIFORD, L.M.; TONE, K.; THRALL, R.M.; ZHU, J. (2001), “Sensitivity And Stability Analysis in DEA: Some Recent Developments”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 15, N. 3. Yönetim ve Ekonomi 21/2 (2014) 1-18 - DYSON, R.G., ALLEN, R., CAMANHO, A.S., PODINOVSKI, V.V., SARRICO, C.S., SHALE, E.A. (2001), “Pitfalls And Protocols in DEA”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol: 132, I. 2, pp. 245-259.
  11. ERDEM, R., ADIGÜZEL, O., KAYA, A. (2010), "Akademik Personelin Kurumlarına İlişkin Algıladıkları ve Tercih Ettikleri Örgüt Kültürü Tipleri",