Journals / Researcher / 2021 / Cilt: 01 Sayı: 02

A Study on Industry 4.0 Awareness of Universities in Turkey

Türkiye'deki Üniversitelerin Endüstri 4.0 Farkındalığı Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Betül Soyöz(TÜRK HAVA KURUMU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-6450-9223
Bahar Özyörük(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5434-6697
Journal
Researcher
Pages
35–50
Publication Date
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although the awareness of the academicians in the departments where the study was applied is high, their studies in the field of Industry 4.0 are very few.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Industry 4.0, which emerged in Germany in 2011, attracted the attention of countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since 2011, companies and researchers in various countries have conducted researches to understand the advantages, disadvantages, contributions to their countries, and transition stages of Industry 4.0.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although the awareness of the academicians in the departments where the study was applied is high, their studies in the field of Industry 4.0 are very few.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:endüstri 4.0 · anket analizi · vaka çalışması

Abstract

Industry 4.0, which emerged in Germany in 2011, attracted the attention of countries. Since 2011, companies and researchers in various countries have conducted researches to understand the advantages, disadvantages, contributions to their countries, and transition stages of Industry 4.0. In this study, the awareness of Industry 4.0 in the academic world was investigated. An online survey was prepared within the scope of the research. Questions were sent to the academicians working in the departments of engineering faculties and business administration of universities via an online survey platform. Although the awareness of the academicians in the departments where the study was applied is high, their studies in the field of Industry 4.0 are very few.

Özet

2011 yılında Almanya'da ortaya çıkan Endüstri 4.0, ülkelerin ilgisini çekti. 2011 yılından bu yana, çeşitli ülkelerdeki şirketler ve araştırmacılar, Endüstri 4.0'ın avantajlarını, dezavantajlarını, ülkelerine katkılarını ve geçiş aşamalarını anlamak için araştırmalar yapmaktadırlar. Bu çalışmada, akademik dünyadaki Endüstri 4.0 farkındalığı araştırılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında bir online anket hazırlanmıştır. Üniversitelerin mühendislik fakültelerinde bulunan bölümlerin akademik personeline ve işletme bölümünde bulunan akademik personele çevrimiçi anket platformu yoluyla sorular gönderilmiştir.. Çalışmanın uygulandığı bölümlerdeki akademisyenlerin farkındalıkları yüksek olmakla birlikte, Endüstri 4.0 alanındaki çalışmaları çok azdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Soyöz, B., Özyörük, B. (2021). A Study on Industry 4.0 Awareness of Universities in Turkey. Researcher, Cilt: 01 Sayı: 02, 35–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/1537264

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Fang, F. (2016). Atomic and close-to-atomic scale manufacturing - A trend in manufacturing development. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 11, 4, 325-327.
  2. Macdougall, W. (2014). Industrie 4.0: Smart manufacturing for the future, Technical report of Germany Trade and Invest.
  3. Firat, O.Z. and Umit Firat, S. (2017). Endüstri 4.0 Yolculuğunda Trendler Ve Robotlar. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 2, 211-223.
  4. Kolberg, D. and Zühlke, D. (2015). Lean Automation Enabled by Industry 4.0 Technologies. IFAC- PapersOnline, 48, 3, 1870-1875.
  5. Hazen, B.T., Skipper, J.B., Ezell, J.D. and Boone, C.A. (2016). Big Data And Predictive Analytics for Supply Chain Sustainability: A Theory-Driven Research Agenda. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 101, 592–598.
  6. Rozados, I. V. and Tjahjono, B. (2014). Big Data Analytics in Supply Chain Management: Trends and Related Research. 6th International Conference on Operations and Supply Chain Management, 1-13.
  7. Leveling, J., Edelbrock, M. and Otto, B. (2014). Big Data Analytics for Supply Chain Management. The IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 918-922.
  8. Tuncel, S., Candan, Z. and Satir, A. (2018). Mobilya Endüstrinde Gelecek Vizyonu Endüstri 4.0. İleri Teknoloji Bilimleri Dergisi, 152-158.
  9. Bhargava, B. and Ranchal, R. (2013). Secure Information Sharing in Digital Supply Chains. 3rd IEEE International Advance Computing Conference, 1636-1630.
  10. Issa, A., Hatiboglu, B., Bildstein, A. and Bauernhansl, T. (2018). Industry 4.0 Roadmap: Framework For Digital Transformation Based On The Concepts Of Capability Maturity And Alignment. Procedia CIRP, 72, 973-978.
  11. Kocak, A. and Diyadin, A. (2018). Sanayi 4.0 Geçiş Süreçlerinde Kritik Başarı Faktörlerinin Dematel Yöntemi ile Değerlendirilmesi. Ege Academic Review, 181, 107-120
  12. Buyukozkan, G. and Gocer, F. (2018), “Digital Supply Chain: Literature Review and a Proposed Framework For Future Research”, Computers in Industry, 157-177.
  13. Buyukozkan, G. and Goçer, F. (2017a). An Extention of ARAS Methodology Based On Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making For Digital Supply Chain. 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst., 1-6.
  14. Buyukozkan, G. and Goçer, F. (2017b). An Extension of MOORA Approach for Group Decision Making Based on Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers In Digital Supply Chain. 2017 Jt. 17th World Congr. Int. Fuzzy Syst. Assoc. 9th Int. Conf., 1-6.
  15. Tsai, W.H. and Lu, Y. H. (2018). A Framework of Production Planning and Control with Carbon Tax under Industry 4.0. Sustainability Journal, 10(9), 1-24.
  16. Schumacher, A., Erol, S. and Sihn, W. (2016). A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 52, 161-166.
  17. Oztemel, E. and Gursev, S. (2018). Türkiye’de Lojistik Yönetiminde Endüstri 4.0 Etkileri ve Yatırım İmkanlarına Bakış Üzerine Anket Uygulaması. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 2, 157-168.
  18. Hamzeh, R., Zhong, R., Xu, X. W., Kajáti, E. and Zolotova I. (2018). A Technology Selection Framework For Manufacturing Companies in The Context Of Industry 4.0. 2018 World Symposium on Digital Intelligence for Systems and Machines, 268-276.
  19. Dalenogarea, L. S.,Beniteza, G. B.,Ayalab, N. F., Franka,A. G. (2018). The Expected Contribution of Industry 4.0 Technologies for Industrial Performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383-394.
  20. Mittal, S., Khan, M.A., Romero, D., Wuest, T. (2018). A critical review of smart manufacturing & Industry 4.0 maturity models: Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 49, 194-214.
  21. Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., Ayala, N. F. (2019). Industry 4.0 Technologies: Implementation Patterns in Manufacturing Companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 15-26.
  22. Dutta, G., Kumar, R., Sindhwani, R., Singh, R. K. (2020). Digital Transformation Priorities of India’s Discrete Manufacturing SMEs – A Conceptual Study in Perspective of Industry 4.0. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal 30 (3), 289-314.
  23. Ozyoruk B. and Soyoz B. (2019). Endüstri Mühendisliği Öğrencilerinin Endüstri 4.0 Farkindalığı Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Middle East International Conference On Multidisciplinary Studies, 1, 401-409.
  24. Alcin, S. (2016). Üretim için yeni bir izlek: sanayi 4.0, Journal of Life Economics, 8, 19-30.
  25. Cekici, V. (2013). Müşteri Şikayet Değerlendirme Süreçleri İçin Kavramsal Bir Model ve Simülasyon Optimizasyon Yöntemi ile Değerlendirilmesi. Doktoral thesis, Cukurova University, Adana.