Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2016 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of cyclic fatique resistance of BT-Race and HyFlex CM instruments

BT-Race ve HyFlex CM döner alet sistemlerinin dönme yorgunluğu dayanımlarının değerlendirilmesi

Pages
11–14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The number of cycles to failure for HyFlex CM (532.36±76.60) was significantly higher than BT-Race (294.72±66.17) (p=0.0001).Conclusions: The results showed that the HyFlex CM instrument, which is made of special 'controlled memory' alloy, had higher cyclic fatique resistance than electropolished BTRace instrument.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the cyclic fatique resistance of HyFlex CM and BT-Race.Materials and Methods: Two types of NiTi instruments with similar size 35, .04 taper and 25 mm length with triangular cross-section were selected: BT-Race and HyFlex CM.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Totally thirty-six files were tested in a stainless steel block with a 1,5 mm-wide simulated canal with a curvature of 45o and a radius of 5 mm.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The number of cycles to failure for HyFlex CM (532.36±76.60) was significantly higher than BT-Race (294.72±66.17) (p=0.0001).Conclusions: The results showed that the HyFlex CM instrument, which is made of special 'controlled memory' alloy, had higher cyclic fatique resistance than electropolished BTRace instrument.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the cyclic fatique resistance of HyFlex CM and BT-Race.Materials and Methods: Two types of NiTi instruments with similar size 35, .04 taper and 25 mm length with triangular cross-section were selected: BT-Race and HyFlex CM. Totally thirty-six files were tested in a stainless steel block with a 1,5 mm-wide simulated canal with a curvature of 45o and a radius of 5 mm. The time to fracture was recorded in seconds for each instrument and the number of cycles to failure was calculated. Data were analyzed with t-test and p<0,05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The number of cycles to failure for HyFlex CM (532.36±76.60) was significantly higher than BT-Race (294.72±66.17) (p=0.0001).Conclusions: The results showed that the HyFlex CM instrument, which is made of special 'controlled memory' alloy, had higher cyclic fatique resistance than electropolished BTRace instrument.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, özel ısıl işlemden üretilen HyFlex CM ve elektro-kimyasal yüzey işlemi yapılan BT-Race döner alet sistemlerinin dönme yorgunluğu dayanımlarının karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmesidir.Gereç ve yöntem: Toplamda 36 adet döner alet kullanılmıştır. BT-Race ve HyFlex CM döner alet sitemlerinin kullanıldığı 2 deney grubunda da üçgen kesite sahip, ISO 35,04 ve 25 mm uzunluktaki eğeler kullanılmıştır. Dönme yorgunluğu testi, 45o eğim açısı, 5 mm eğim yarıçapı ve 1,5 mm iç çapa sahip paslanmaz çelik yapay bir kanal düzeneğinde yapılmıştır. Eğelerin kırılmasına kadar geçen süre bir kronometre ile saniye cinsinden kaydedilmiş ve elde edilen değere göre kırılma anındaki dönme sayısı hesaplanmıştır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde bağımsız t testi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, anlamlılık p<0.05 düzeyinde değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Hyflex CM grubuna ait kırılma anındaki dönme sayısı (532.36±76.60), BT-Race grubundan (294.72±66.17) istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek bulunmuştur (p=0.0001).Sonuç: Özel bir ısıl işlem uygulanarak üretilen HyFlex CM eğelerin döngüsel yorgunluk dayanımları, EP ile yüzey düzeltme işlemi yapılan BT-Race eğelerden daha yüksektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

IŞIK, V., ERSEV, H., BARUT, G. (2016). Comparison of cyclic fatique resistance of BT-Race and HyFlex CM instruments. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 11–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/153647

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004;30:559-67
  2. Schäfer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod 2004; 30: 432-435
  3. Kum KY, Spängberg L, Cha BY, Il-Young J, Msd, SeungJong L, Chan-Young L. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod 2000; 26: 719-723
  4. Thompson SA. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J 2000; 33: 297-310
  5. Schäfer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2004; 37: 239-248
  6. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means Endodontic Topics 2005; 10: 30-76
  7. Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 203-212
  8. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL. Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic systems. J Endod 1997; 23: 77-85
  9. Sattapan B, Nervo G, Palamara J, Messer H. Defects in nickel titanium endodontic rotary files after clinical usage. J Endod 2000; 26: 161-165
  10. Yared G. In vitro study of the torsional properties of new and used ProFile nickel titanium rotary files. J Endod 2004; 30: 410-412
  11. Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod 2006; 32: 1031-1043
  12. Martín B, Zelada G, Varela P, Bahillo JG, Magán F, Ahn S, Rodríguez C. Factors influencing the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 262- 266
  13. Turpin YL, Chagneau F, Vulcain JM. Impact of two theoretical cross-sections on torsional and bending stresses of nickel-titanium root canal instrument models. J Endod 2000; 26: 414-417
  14. Tripi TR, Bonaccorso A, Condorelli GG. Cyclic fatigue of different nickel-titanium endodontic rotary instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 15. Anderson ME, Price JW, Parashos P. Fracture resistance of electropolished rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2007; 33: 1212-1216
  15. Bui TB, Mitchell JC, Baumgartner JC. Effect