SavedAdd your journal

Journals / PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

DEVELOPING REGIONAL COOPERATION AMONG TURKEY, GEORGIA AND AZERBAIJAN: IMPORTANCE OF REGIONAL PROJECTS

Mehmet Dikkaya(Kafkas University, Department of Economics / Turkey)
Deniz Özyakışır(Kafkas University, Department of Economics / Turkey, e-mail)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2008-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper presents the major dynamics of this emerging regional economic cooperation among these three countries by focusing on infrastructural cooperation such as transportation, telecommunication, and pipeline projects and factor movements such as trade in goods and services, labor and capital flows among these countries

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since the collapse of the former Soviet Union, the leaders of the Caucasian countries and the economists interested in the region have always spoken favorably about the prospects of a regional cooperation among the Caucasian countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, the war in Nagorno-Karabakh between Armenia and Azerbaijan dramatically weakened the viability of such cooperation projects; Turkey’s contribution accelerated regional integration among countries in the mid-1990s, except Armenia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper presents the major dynamics of this emerging regional economic cooperation among these three countries by focusing on infrastructural cooperation such as transportation, telecommunication, and pipeline projects and factor movements such as trade in goods and services, labor and capital flows among these countries
🔬Design:Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Regionalism · Caucasus · BTC Oil Pipeline

Abstract

Since the collapse of the former Soviet Union, the leaders of the Caucasian countries and the economists interested in the region have always spoken favorably about the prospects of a regional cooperation among the Caucasian countries. Their rhetoric and joint declarationscall attention to their common historical background and the Soviet experience. However, the war in Nagorno-Karabakh between Armenia and Azerbaijan dramatically weakened the viability of such cooperation projects; Turkey’s contribution accelerated regional integration among countries in the mid-1990s, except Armenia. This paper presents the major dynamics of this emerging regional economic cooperation among these three countries by focusing on infrastructural cooperation such as transportation, telecommunication, and pipeline projects and factor movements such as trade in goods and services, labor and capital flows among these countries

🔖

Cite This Article

Dikkaya, M., Özyakışır, D. (2008). DEVELOPING REGIONAL COOPERATION AMONG TURKEY, GEORGIA AND AZERBAIJAN: IMPORTANCE OF REGIONAL PROJECTS. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1535683

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Aras, Bulent. “Turkey’s Policy in the Former Soviet South: Assets and Options” Turkish Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, Spring 2000, pp. 36-58.
  2. Aydin, Mustafa “Foucault’s Pendulum: Turkey in Central Asia and the Caucasus”, Turkish Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, Summer 2004, pp. 1-22.
  3. Azerbaijan Country Forecast, in Political Risk Yearbook of PRS Group Inc., 2007.
  4. Babalı, Tuncay. “Implications of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Main Oil Pipeline Project”, Perceptions, Winter 2005, pp. 29-50.
  5. Balassa, Bela. Economic Development and Integration, Mexico: Centro De Estusios Monetarios Latinoamericanos, 1965.
  6. Balat, Mustafa. “The Case of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Oil Pipeline System: A Review”, Energy Sources, Part B, 1, 2006, pp. 117-126.
  7. Balcı, Osman & Ali Akçoban, “BTC ile Akdeniz`e inen petrolü Haydar Aliyev tankeri taşıyacak”, Zaman, (10.01.2008).
  8. BOTAS (Petroleum Pipeline Corporation), http://www.botas.gov.tr/ projeler/projeler.asp#02 (18.01.2008).
  9. BP Caspian, http://www.bp.com (29.01.2008).
  10. Bremmer, Ian & Alyson Bailes. “Sub-Regionalism in the Newly Independent States”, International Affairs vol. 74, no: 1, 1998, pp. 131-147.
  11. Cinar, Menderes. “Turkey’s Transformation under the AKP Rule”, The Muslim World, vol. 96, July 2006, pp. 469-486.
  12. Dikkaya, Mehmet. “Kafkasya’da Ulaşımda Bölgesel İşbirliği ve Kars- Tiflis-Bakü Demiryolu Projesi” http://usakgundem.com/uayazar.php?id=607 (10.09.2007).
  13. Ertugrul, Ahmet & Faruk Selçuk. “A Brief Account of the Turkish Economy, 1980–2000”, Russian and East European Finance and Trade, vol. 37, no. 6, November–December 2001, pp. 6–30.
  14. http://www.countrywatch.com (20.04.2008).
  15. Hunter, Shireen. “Turkey, Central Asia, and the Caucasus: Ten Years after Independence”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, vol. 1, no: 2, May 2001, pp. 1-16.
  16. Ilkorur, Korkmaz. “AKP Ekonomide Başarılı Oldu mu?”, Radikal (22.05.2007).
  17. International Construction, “Iron silk road”, September 2007.
  18. International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook, April 2008.
  19. Ismayilov, Rovshan. “Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey: Building a Transportation Triumvirate?” http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/ insight/articles/eav020707.shtml (02.07.2007).
  20. Kahnert, F. & P. Richards at all. Economic Integration among Developing Countries, Paris: Development Centre of the OECD, 1969.
  21. Kılıç Nurel. “Yurtdışı Müteahhitlik Hizmetlerinin Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri”, Araştırma ve Meslekleri Geliştirme Müdürlüğü, Haziran 2004, p. 18, http://www.izto.org.tr (29.01.2008).
  22. Ozturk, Harun Kemal & Arif Hepbasli. “Natural Gas Implementation in Turkey. Part 2: Natural Gas Pipeline Projects”, Energy Sources, vol. 26, no: 3, 2004, pp. 287-297.
  23. Papava, Vladimer. “Georgia’s Economic Role in the South Caucasus”, Problems of Economic Transition, vol. 48, no. 4, August 2005, pp. 84-92.
  24. Pomfret, Richard. Central Asia Turns South? Trade Relations in Transition, London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1999.
  25. Robson, Peter. The Economics of International Integration, London&New York: George Allen&Unwin, 1998.
  26. Ruseckas, Laurent. “Turkey and Eurasia: Opportunities and Risks in the Caspian Pipeline Derby”, Journal of International Affairs, vol. 54, no. 1, Fall 2000, pp. 217-236.
  27. TCA (Turkish Contractors Association), http://www.tmb.org.tr/genel. php?ID=10 (29.01.2008).
  28. The Budapest Sun, September 20-26, 2007.
  29. The World Bank, http://www.worlbank.org (30.07.2008).
  30. TIKA (The Turkish International Cooperation and Development Agency) Azerbaycan Cumhuriyeti, http://www.tika.gov.tr (29.01.2008).
  31. TIKA (The Turkish International Cooperation and Development Agency) Gürcistan Ülke Profili, http://www.tika.gov.tr (29.01.2008).
  32. TPOA (The Turkish Petroleum Company), http://www.tpao.gov. tr/v1.4/index.php?option=com_section&task=view&id=3&itemid=15 (06.02.2008).
  33. UN Commodity Trade Statistics Database, http://comtrade.un.org (06.05.2008).
  34. Wertsch, James V. “Georgia as a Laboratory for Democracy”, Demokratizatsiya, vol. 13 no: 4, Fall 2005, pp. 519-535.
  35. Winrow, Gareth M. “Turkey and the East-West Gas Transportation Corridor”, Turkish Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, Summer 2004, pp. 23-42.
  36. Winrow, Gareth M. “Turkey and the East-West Gas Transportation Corridor”, Turkish Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, Summer 2004, pp. 23-42.