Journals / PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs / 2020 / Volume: 25 Issue: 2

Grand Strategizing in and for Turkish Foreign Policy: Lessons Learned from History, Geography and Practice

Mustafa Aydın(KADIR HAS UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4029-6681
Pages
—
Publication Date
2021-01-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moving from these bases, particulars of what could be identified as an “internationalist” grand strategy alternative for Turkey is offered.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although there is no commonly agreed upon definition of grand strategy in the literature, most analyses of the concept include efforts of states to develop long-term plans, programs and policies to achieve their national interests, utilizing the nation’s resources and tools, including their economic, political, military, psychological and moral resources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Turkey has experience in developing a grand strategy in this context, albeit without specifically referring to the exercise as such.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moving from these bases, particulars of what could be identified as an “internationalist” grand strategy alternative for Turkey is offered.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:grand strategy · Turkish foreign policy · Turkish grand strategy

Abstract

Although there is no commonly agreed upon definition of grand strategy in the literature, most analyses of the concept include efforts of states to develop long-term plans, programs and policies to achieve their national interests, utilizing the nation’s resources and tools, including their economic, political, military, psychological and moral resources. Turkey has experience in developing a grand strategy in this context, albeit without specifically referring to the exercise as such. This paper looks at the expertise and historical precursors of Turkey’s grand strategy experience to identify indicators for its future grand strategizing efforts. In this context, balancing major powers, the primacy of geography, economic development, Western connection, the impact of the international system, a sense of greatness and a wish for regional supremacy are identified as inputs of Turkey’s past grand strategies. Moving from these bases, particulars of what could be identified as an “internationalist” grand strategy alternative for Turkey is offered.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydın, M. (2021). Grand Strategizing in and for Turkish Foreign Policy: Lessons Learned from History, Geography and Practice. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, Volume: 25 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1535445

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. References are indicated in the article References are indicated in the article References are indicated in the article