Journals / Electrica / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

A Canonical 3-D P53 Network Model that Determines Cell Fate by Counting Pulses

Journal
Electrica
Pages
284–291
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By introducing a new variable to the core oscillator in the p53 network, this study demonstrates that p53 network can be considered a modular structure, which consists of an oscillator and other variables that control this oscillator to contribute to cell fate determination.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:From a system theory perspective, p53 network dynamics is interesting since it can exhibit three dynamical modes of p53, namely low-level equilibrium, oscillation, and high-level equilibrium.
📊
Key Findings & Data:P53DINP1, which is the mediator of this feedback, is added as a variable to a 2-D oscillator model of the p53 network.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By introducing a new variable to the core oscillator in the p53 network, this study demonstrates that p53 network can be considered a modular structure, which consists of an oscillator and other variables that control this oscillator to contribute to cell fate determination.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

From a system theory perspective, p53 network dynamics is interesting since it can exhibit three dynamical modes of p53, namely low-level equilibrium, oscillation, and high-level equilibrium. Each of these modes are associated with different cell fate outcomes: cell survival, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis. The literature reveals that a high level (apoptosis) is seen only after ending the oscillation phase, so called two-phase dynamics, which provides the decision of apoptosis depending on the oscillation duration. This paper proposes that a negative feedback can keep time by counting the pulses of oscillation to take the decision of apoptosis or cell survival. P53DINP1, which is the mediator of this feedback, is added as a variable to a 2-D oscillator model of the p53 network. The resulting canonical 3-D model successfully replicates the two-phase dynamics. That is, it possesses temporary oscillatory behavior, in which first oscillations (first phase) and then high level state (second phase) are observed. By introducing a new variable to the core oscillator in the p53 network, this study demonstrates that p53 network can be considered a modular structure, which consists of an oscillator and other variables that control this oscillator to contribute to cell fate determination.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRKIRAN, G., DEMİR, G. K., GÜZELİŞ, C. (2018). A Canonical 3-D P53 Network Model that Determines Cell Fate by Counting Pulses. Electrica, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 284–291. https://ajindex.com/articles/153533

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. F. Murray-Zmijewski, E. A. Slee, X. Lu, “A complex barcode underlies the heterogeneous response of p53 to stress,” Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 702-712, 2008.
  2. D. Michael, M. Oren, “The p53-Mdm2 module and the ubiquitin system,” Semin Cancer Biol, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 49-58, 2003.
  3. G. Lahav, N. Rosenfeld, A. Sigal, N. Geva-Zatorsky, A. J. Levine, M. B. Elowitz, U. Alon, “Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells,” Nat Genet, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 147-150, 2004.
  4. E. Batchelor, A. Loewer, C. Mock, G. Lahav, “Stimulus‐dependent dynamics of p53 in single cells,” Mol Syst Biol, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 488, 2011.
  5. E. Batchelor, A. Loewer, G. Lahav, “The ups and downs of p53: Understanding protein dynamics in single cells”, Nat Rev Cancer, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 371-377, 2009.
  6. E. Batchelor, C. S. Mock, I. Bhan, A. Loewer, G. Lahav, “Recurrent initiation: a mechanism for triggering p53 pulses in response to DNA damage”, Mol Cell, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 277-289, 2008.
  7. J. E. Toettcher, A. Loewer, G. J. Ostheimer, M. B. Yaffe, B. Tidor, G. Lahav, “Distinct mechanisms act in concert to mediate cell cycle arrest”, Proc Natl Acad Sci, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 785-790, 2009. G. Lahav, “The strength of indecisiveness: oscillatory behavior for better cell fate determination”, Send to Sci STKE, vol. 2004, no. 264, pp. pe55, 2004.
  8. F. Essmann, I. H. Engels, G. Totzke, K. Schulze-Osthoff, R. U. Jänicke, “Apoptosis resistance of MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells to ionizing radiation is independent of p53 and cell cycle control but caused by the lack of caspase-3 and a caffeine-inhibitable event”, Cancer Res, vol. 64, no. 19, pp. 7065-7072, 2004.
  9. N. D. Marchenko, A. Zaika, U. M. Moll, “Death signal-induced localization of p53 protein to mitochondria a potential role in apoptotic signaling”, J Biol Chem, vol. 275, no. 21, pp. 16202-16212, 2000.
  10. M. Mihara, S. Erster, A. Zaika, O. Petrenko, T. Chittenden, P. Pancoska, U. M. Moll, “p53 has a direct apoptogenic role at the mitochondria”, Mol Cell, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 577-590, 2003.
  11. S. Shreeram, W. K. Hee, O. N. Demidov, C. Kek, H. Yamaguchi, A. J. Fornace, D. V. Bulavin, “Regulation of ATM/P53-dependent suppression of myc-induced lymphomas by Wip1 phosphatase”, J Exp Med, vol. 203, no. 13, pp. 2793-2799, 2006.
  12. S. Shreeram, O. Demidov, W. Hee, H. Yamaguchi, N. Onishi, C. Kek, O. Timofeev, C. Dudgeon, A. Fornace, C. Anderson, Y. Minami, E. Appella, D. V. Bulavin, “Wip1 phosphatase modulates ATM-dependent signaling pathways”, Mol cell