Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Evidence-Based Practice During Intrapartum Period: Preferences of Women Giving Birth

İntrapartum Dönemde Kanıta Dayalı Uygulamalar: Doğum Yapan Kadınların Tercihleri

Pages
1313–7425
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, 0.9% of the women wanted to deliver their baby by standing, 2.2% in squatting and sitting position, and 42.5% in water.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Evidence-based practice is an effective strategy to improve the quality of intrapartum care especially in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The descriptive study sample included 325 women who had vaginal delivery at a state hospital in Manisa.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, 0.9% of the women wanted to deliver their baby by standing, 2.2% in squatting and sitting position, and 42.5% in water.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kanıta Dayalı Uygulamalar · İntrapartum Dönem · Doğum

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based practice is an effective strategy to improve the quality of intrapartum care especially in recent years. The World Health Organization has emphasized that the ineffective and harmful clinical practices should be replaced with evidence-based ones. Objectives: The aim of the study is to determine women’s preferences about effective and ineffective interventions during intrapartum period in accordance with evidence-based practices. Methods: The descriptive study sample included 325 women who had vaginal delivery at a state hospital in Manisa. Descriptive analysis was performed for evaluating data by using SPSS 21.0. Results: The mean age of the women was 26.0 ±3.6. In intrapartum period, 84.0% of the women wanted to eat something, 96.6% wanted to stay with one of their relatives, 97.8% wanted to do breathing-relaxation techniques, 48.9% wanted massage, 97.8% wanted emotional support and 93.5% wanted to move in the room. Women did not want induction (95.0%), abdominal pressure (95.1%), enema (92.6%) and episiotomy (95.1%). Overall, 0.9% of the women wanted to deliver their baby by standing, 2.2% in squatting and sitting position, and 42.5% in water. Conclusion: Most of women stated that they did not want some ineffective interventions to be applied during intrapartum period. Women’s preferences should be considered providing evidence-based intrapartum care

Özet

Giriş: Son yıllarda kanıta dayalı uygulama intrapartum bakım kalitesini arttırmak için etkili bir strateji olarak kabul edilmektedir. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü, etkisiz ve zararlı klinik uygulamaların kanıta dayalı uygulamalarla değiştirilmesi gerektiğini vurgulamaktadır. Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı intrapartum dönemde kanıta dayalı uygulamalar doğrultusunda uygulanan girişimler hakkında kadınların tercihlerini belirlemektir. Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı tipteki bu araştırmanın örneklemini Manisa’da bir devlet hastanesinde normal doğum yapan 325 kadın oluşturmuştur. Veriler tanımlayıcı analizler ile SPSS 21.0 programı kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Kadınların yaş ortalaması 26.0±3.6’dır. İntrapartum dönemde kadınların %84.0’ı bir şeyler yemek istediğini, %96.6’sı yakınlarından birinin yanında kalmasını istediğini, %97.8’i nefes alma-gevşeme teknikleri yapmak istediğini, %48.9’u masaj yapılmasını istediğini, %97.8’i duygusal destek verilmesini istediğini ve %93.5’i odada hareket etmeyi istediğini belirtmiştir. Kadınların istemediği girişimler indüksiyon (%95.0), karnına basınç (%95.1), lavman (%92.6) ve epizyotomidir (%95.1). Kadınların %0.9’u ayakta, %2.2’si çömelme, oturma pozisyonunda ve %42.5’i suda doğum yapmak istediğini belirtmiştir. Sonuç: Bu çalışmada kadınların çoğunluğu intrapartum dönemde uygulanan etkisiz ba

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKDEMİR, H., YANIKKEREM, E. (2018). Evidence-Based Practice During Intrapartum Period: Preferences of Women Giving Birth. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 1313–7425. https://ajindex.com/articles/153399

References (11)

  1. Aasheim, V., Nilsen, A.B., Lukasse, M., & Reinar, L.M. (2011, Dec 7). Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, 12, Art. No: CD006672. Retrived November 9, 2016, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006672.pub2/pdf/
  2. Alfirevic, Z., Devane, D., & Gyte, G.M. (2013, May 31). Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, 5, Art. No: CD006066. Retrived November 9 2016, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub2/pdf
  3. Basevi, V., & Lavender, T. (2014, Nov 14). Routine perineal shaving on admission in labour. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, 11 Art. No: CD001236. Retrived November 9, 2016, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001236.pub2/pdf
  4. Berghella, V., Baxter, J.K., & Chauhan, S.P. (2008). Evidence-based labor and delivery management. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 199 (5), 445-454.
  5. Bugg, G.J., Siddiqui, F., & Thornton, G.J. (2011, Jul 6). Oxytocin versus no treatment or delayed treatment for slow progress in the first stage of spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, 6, Art No: CD007123. Retrived November 9, 2016, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007123.pub2/full.
  6. Carroli, G., & Mignini, L. (2009, Jan 21). Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, 1, Art No:CD000081. Retrived November 9, 2016, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2/pdf/
  7. Chen, C., Wang, S.Y., & Chang, M.Y. (2001). Women’s perceptions of helpful and unhelpful nursing behaviors during labor: A study in Taiwan. Birth, 28 (3), 180-185.
  8. Chen, C.Y., & Wang, K.G. (2006). Are routine interventions necessary in normal birth? Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 45 (4), 302-306.
  9. Conde-Agudelo, A., Rosas-Bermudez, A., & Gulmezoglu, A.M. (2008). Evidence-based intrapartum care in Cali, Colombia: A quantitative and qualitative study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 3, 1547-1549.
  10. Creedon, D., Akkerman, D., Atwood, L., Bates, L., Harper, C., Levin, A., et al. (2013, March). Management of labor. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Retrived November 9, 2016, from http://www.spog.org.pe/web/phocadownloadpap/GUIAMANEJODELPARTO.pdf
  11. Dahlen, H.G., Homer, C.S.E., Cooke, M., Upton, A.M., Nunn, R.