SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Numerical Approaches to Van der Waals Interactions in Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Doped Polymer Composites

Karbon Nanotüp (KNT) Katkılı Polimer Kompozitlerde Van der Waals Etkileşimlerine Sayısal Yaklaşımlar

Mehmet Bayırlı(BALIKESİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, FİZİK BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-7775-0251
Aykut Ilgaz(Balıkesir Üniversitesi)0000-0002-9632-0281
Pages
1078–1089
Publication Date
2026-03-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, it was observed that as the nanotube concentration increased, the vdW energy increased negatively (stronger interaction) and the polymer particle size decreased.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The distribution of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in the polymer matrix and their interfacial interactions directly affect the atomic and molecular properties of the material.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, van der Waals (vdW) interactions in polymer composites with different CNT concentrations in the range of 1-5% by weight were investigated by numerical methods and modeled using the Lennard-Jones potential and the Hamaker constant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, it was observed that as the nanotube concentration increased, the vdW energy increased negatively (stronger interaction) and the polymer particle size decreased.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Van der Waals etkileşimleri · Karbon nanotüp (KNT) · Polimer kompozitler

Abstract

The distribution of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in the polymer matrix and their interfacial interactions directly affect the atomic and molecular properties of the material. For this purpose, van der Waals (vdW) interactions in polymer composites with different CNT concentrations in the range of 1-5% by weight were investigated by numerical methods and modeled using the Lennard-Jones potential and the Hamaker constant. In addition, energy distributions at the atomic scale were analyzed with the help of Python-based simulation. According to the results, it was observed that as the nanotube concentration increased, the vdW energy increased negatively (stronger interaction) and the polymer particle size decreased. The created model was supported by the parameters obtained from Density Functional Theory (DFT) (ε = 0.0021 eV, σ = 0.34 nm) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The findings emphasize the critical role of CNT-polymer matrix interfacial interactions in optimizing material performance. It was determined that vdW energy reached -28.91 eV level and a 5.1% reduction in polymer particle size was observed, especially in 5% CNT doped composites. These results provide guidance for the design of high performance composite materials for industrial applications.

Özet

Karbon nanotüplerin (KNT) polimer matris içindeki dağılımı ve arayüzey etkileşimleri, malzemenin atomik ve moleküler özelliklerini doğrudan etkiler. Bu amaçla ağırlıkça %1-%5 aralığındaki farklı KNT konsantrasyonlarına sahip polimer kompozitlerde meydana gelen van der Waals (vdW) etkileşimleri sayısal yöntemler ile incelenmiş olup Lennard-Jones potansiyeli ve Hamaker sabiti kullanılarak modellenmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra Python tabanlı simülasyon yardımıyla atomik ölçekte enerji dağılımları analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre nanotüp konsantrasyonu arttıkça vdW enerjisinin negatif yönde arttığını (daha güçlü etkileşim) ve polimer parçacık boyutunun küçüldüğü gözlenmiştir. Oluşturulan model, Yoğunluk Fonksiyonel Teorisinden (YFT) elde edilen parametreler (ε = 0.0021 eV, σ = 0.34 nm) ile moleküler dinamik (MD) simülasyonlar yardımıyla desteklenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, KNT-polimer matris arayüzey etkileşimlerinin malzeme performansını optimize etmedeki kritik rolünü vurgulamaktadır. Özellikle %5 katkılı kompozitlerde vdW enerjisinin -28.91 eV seviyesine ulaştığı ve polimer parçacık boyutunda %5.1'lik bir küçülme gözlendiği belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlar, endüstriyel uygulamalar için yüksek performanslı kompozit malzemelerin tasarımına yol gösterici niteliktedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bayırlı, M., Ilgaz, A. (2026). Numerical Approaches to Van der Waals Interactions in Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Doped Polymer Composites. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 1078–1089. https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1695855

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Ameen F., Atif M., Mahmood K., Yousuf UF. Qualitative and quantitative impact of filler on thermomechanical properties of epoxy composites. Polymers for Advanced Technologies 2021; 32: 2813–2828. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.5304
  2. Anderson JA., Lorenz CD., Travesset A. General purpose molecular dynamics simulations fully ımplemented on graphics processing units. Journal of Computational Physics 2008; 227(10): 5342-5359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2008.01.047.
  3. Atif M., Afzaal I., Naseer H., Abrar M., Bongiovanni R. Surface modification of carbon nanotubes: A tool to control electrochemical performance. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology 2020; 9(4): 041009. https://doi.org/10.1149/2162-8777/ab8929
  4. Bayırlı M., Ilgaz A., Zeybek O. A study about the relationships between surface structures and electrical impedance characteristics in single-walled carbon nanotube/ polyester composites. Physica B:Condensed Matter 2024; 673: 415501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2023.415501
  5. Bodaghi A., Vilardi AR., Hui JL. The effects of moisture absorption on the ınterfacial and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Journal of Composite Materials 2020; 54(10): 1325-1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998319883421
  6. Chen J., Liu B., Gao X., Xu D. A review of the interfacial characteristics of polymer nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes. RSC Advances 2018; 8(49): 28048-28085. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra04205e
  7. Cheng ZQ., Liu H., Tan W. Advanced computational modelling of composite materials. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2024; 305: 110120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110120
  8. Drathi MR., Ghosh A. Multiscale modeling of polymer-matrix composites. Computational Materials Science 2015; 99: 62-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.10.023
  9. Frankland SV., Harik VM., Odegard GM., Brenner DW., Gates TS. The stress-strain behavior of polymer-nanotube composites from molecular dynamics simulation. Composite Science and Technology 2003; 63(11):1655-1661. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00059-9
  10. Frenkel D., Smit B. Understanding molecular simulation: From algorithms to applications (2nd ed.). Academic Press. 2002
  11. Fu C., Venturi V., Kim J., Ahmad Z., Ells AW., Viswanathan V., Helms BA. Universal chemomechanical design rules for solid-ion conductors to prevent dendrite formation in lithium metal batteries. Natural Materials 2020; 19: 758–766.
  12. Hamaker C. The London—van der Waals attraction between spherical particles. Physica 1937; 4(10): 1058-1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(37)80203-7
  13. Hertel T., Walkup RE. Avouris P. Deformation of carbon nanotubes by surface van der Waals forces. Physical Review B 1998; 58(20): 13870. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.13870
  14. Israelachvili JN. Intermolecular and surface forces (3rd ed.). Academic Press. (2011)
  15. Kuilla T., Bhadra S., Yao D., Kim NH., Bose S., Lee JH. Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Progress in Polymer Science 2010; 35: 1350-1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.005
  16. Li L., Wei B., Zhang H. Influence of hygrothermal environment on the ınterfacial shear strength of graphene oxide/polyamide composites. Composites Science and Technology 2021; 215: 109001. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109001.
  17. Li, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, Z. Molecular dynamics study on the conformational and dynamic properties of epoxy resin reinforced with single-walled carbon nanotubes. Computational Materials Science 2022; 214: 111756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111756
  18. Liu H., Zhang Y. Wang L. Graphene-polymer interfacial interactions: A multiscale perspective. Journal of Materials Science & Technology 2023; 145: 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.11.020
  19. Plimpton S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 1995; 117(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039
  20. Raju M., Roy S., van Duin ACT. Modeling of interfacial interactions in polymer nanocomposites using the ReaxFF method. Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2011; 115(2): 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp108619t
  21. Rudden MS., Byrne C., Menzel R. Radius of gyration as a scalable characteristic of polymer chains in nanocomposites. Polymer 2020; 202: 122718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122718
  22. Smith TJ., Johnson LK. Comparative analysis of functional group contributions to interfacial adhesion in polymer-carbon nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Science 2020; 55(15): 6432–6445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04472-2
  23. Taherian R., Ghorbani MM. Investigation of the electrical properties of polymer/carbon composites exposed to joule heating and heat treatment. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology 2017; 6(6): M3019. https://doi.org/:10.1149/2.0051706jss
  24. Zhang Y., Wang H., Liu Q. Enhanced interfacial interactions in carbonyl-containing polymer composites with carbon nanotubes: A DFT study. Carbon 2022; 189: 265-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.12.063