SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Personal data protection from the political economy perspective

Ekonomi politik açıdan kişisel verilerin korunması

SERPİL KARLIDAĞ
Pages
127–152
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within the context of all the aforementioned issues, this article aims to contribute to the ongoing debate about the draft law awaiting enactment since the year 2003 by elaborating with a political economy approach on personal data protection where the law, market, and technology commingle.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Post-Fordist mode of production and information technologies have turned personal data into commodities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thanks to the information technologies, personal data can be easily compiled, stored, and transferred to third parties.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within the context of all the aforementioned issues, this article aims to contribute to the ongoing debate about the draft law awaiting enactment since the year 2003 by elaborating with a political economy approach on personal data protection where the law, market, and technology commingle.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Post-Fordist mode of production and information technologies have turned personal data into commodities. Thanks to the information technologies, personal data can be easily compiled, stored, and transferred to third parties. Yet, the protection of privacy constitutes a problem. While firms, acting on profit making motives, tend not to prioritize privacy protection, laws and international regulations fail to maintain efficacy by themselves. Although technology is utilized to both ends, it is designed more for compiling and storing data due to commercial concerns rather than protecting them. Within the context of all the aforementioned issues, this article aims to contribute to the ongoing debate about the draft law awaiting enactment since the year 2003 by elaborating with a political economy approach on personal data protection where the law, market, and technology commingle.

Özet

Post-fordist üretim tarzı ve enformasyon teknolojileri, kişisel verileri sermaye birikimine katkıda bulunan meta haline getirmiştir. Enformasyon teknolojilerinin kullanımıyla, kişisel veriler kolaylıkla toplanıp, depolanıp, üçüncü taraflara aktarılmakta ancak gizliliğin korunması sorun olmaktadır. Kâr amacıyla hareket eden firmalar, gizliliğin korunmasını ikinci plana atarken, yasalar ve uluslararası düzenlemeler de tek başlarına etkin olamamaktadır. Teknoloji iki taraflı kullanılmakla birlikte, ticari baskılarla verileri korumaktan çok toplayıp, saklama yönünde tasarlanmıştır. Tüm bu sorunlar bağlamında bu makalenin amacı, yasa, piyasa ve teknolojinin birbirine geçtiği kişisel veri korumasını ekonomi politik açıdan ele alarak 2003 yılından itibaren bekleyen yasa tasarısıyla ilgili tartışmalara katkıda bulunmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARLIDAĞ, S. (2013). Personal data protection from the political economy perspective. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 127–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/153361

References (15)

  1. A Face is Exposed for AOL Searcher No.4417749, The New York Times, 09/08/2006.
  2. Acquisti, Alessandro (2010),”The Economics of Personal Data and the Economics of Privacy”, OECD Privacy Guidelines. Advantage 75 Milyon Dolara HSBC Bank’ın, Hürriyet Gazetesi (09/08/2002).
  3. Aglietta, Michel (2000),
  4. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation, New York: Verso Amaç Devleti Şeffaf Hale Getirmek, C: Documents and SettingsUser1DesktopAmaç Devleti şeffaf hale getirmek - Yorum - Radikal İnternet.htm 26/06/2008.
  5. Amin, Ash (2000), “Post-Fordism, Models, Fantasies and Phantoms of Transition”, Post- Fordism: A Reader, (der), s.4-40.
  6. Amin, Ash., U.K: Blackwell Publishing ? Baker, Jennifer (2011), “Web Paths are Personal Data Says Consumer Group”.www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/239741/web_paths_are-personal-data-says-consumer-group.html (19/05/2012).
  7. Bennett, Colin. J. (2011), “In Defence of Privacy: the Concept ad the Regime”, Surveillance & Society 8(4), s. 485-496.
  8. Bergkamp, Lucas, Hunton - Williams (2002), “EU Data Protection Policy: The Privacy Fallacy: Adverse Effects of Europe’s Data Protection Policy in an Information-Driven Economy”. Computer Law & Security Report 18: 31-47.
  9. Birnhack, Michael D.(2008),“The EU Data Protection Directive: An Engine of a Global Regime”, Computer Law & Securitu Report, 24, s. 508-520.
  10. Campbell, John Edward - Carlson, Matt (2010), “Panopticon.com: Online Surveillance and the Commodification of Privacy”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 46: 4, s.586-606. Connecticut Attorney General's Office Press Release, http: //www.ct.gov/ag/ cwp/ view.Asp?A=2341&Q=462754 Electronic Frontier Foundation (2011), “Data Protection Regulation and the Politics of Interoperability” www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/data-protection-regulation-and politics-interoperability ( 16/05/2012). EU Directive, http: //www.cdt.org/privacy/ eudirective/ EU_Directive html Hesmondhalgh David (2010). “User-generated content, free labour and the cultural industries”, Ephemera,10 (3/4): 267-284.
  11. Fuchs, Christian (2010), “Labour inInformational Capitalism and on the Internet”, TheInformation Society, 26, s. 179-196.
  12. Fuchs, Christian (2011), “The Political Economy of Google”, http://english.unak.is/ static/files/Nordmedia2011/Fuchs_Christian.pdf (25/05/2012)
  13. Fuchs, Christian (2011a), “Web 2.0, Prosumption, and Surveillance”, Surveillance & Society, 8 (3), s. 288-309.
  14. Fuchs, Christian (2011b), “An Alternative View of Privacy on Facebook”, Information, s. 140-165.
  15. Fuchs, Christi