Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Percutaneous cryoablation in early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of local tumor progression factors

Pages
111–117
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Minimal ablative margin <5 mm was a significant prognostic factor for LTP

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous cryoablation (PC) for early or very early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and assess the risk factors for local tumor progression (LTP) after PC.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS A total of 45 treatment-naïve patients treated with PC for early or very early stage HCCs were included in this retrospective study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Minimal ablative margin <5 mm was a significant prognostic factor for LTP
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous cryoablation (PC) for early or very early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and assess the risk factors for local tumor progression (LTP) after PC. METHODS A total of 45 treatment-naïve patients treated with PC for early or very early stage HCCs were included in this retrospective study. The safety of PC was assessed by evaluating procedure-related complications and comparing hepatic function before and after the procedure. The effectiveness was assessed by evaluating technical success, LTP rates, and disease progression (DP) rates. Prognostic factors associated with LTP after PC were also analyzed. RESULT Technical success and complete response were achieved in all patients (100%) by 1 month after PC. During a mean of 28.1±15.6 months of follow-up, the incidences of LTP and DP were 11.1% and 37.8%, respectively. The LTP-free and DP-free survival rates were 93.3% and 84.4% at 1 year and 88.9% and 62.2% at 2 years, respectively. Hepatic function was normalized within 3 months after PC. There were no major complications and only one minor complication of small hematoma. On univariate and multivariate analysis, minimal ablative margin <5 mm was the only significant risk factor associated with LTP. CONCLUSION PC is a safe and effective therapy for patients with early or very early stage HCC. Minimal ablative margin <5 mm was a significant prognostic factor for LTP

🔖

Cite This Article

KİM, D. K., HAN, K., WON, J. Y., KİM, G. M., KWON, J. H., KİM, M. (2020). Percutaneous cryoablation in early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of local tumor progression factors. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 111–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/153193

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Mittal S, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of HCC: consider the population. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013
  2. S2–6. [CrossRef] 2. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010
  3. 2893–2917. [CrossRef] 3. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012
  4. 908–943. [CrossRef] 4. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011
  5. 1020–1022. [CrossRef] 5. Cho CM, Tak WY, Kweon YO, et al. The comparative results of radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Hepatol 2005
  6. 59–71. 6. Choi D, Lim HK, Rhim H, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma as a first-line treatment: long-term results and prognostic factors in a large single-institution series. Eur Radiol 2007
  7. 684–692. [CrossRef] 7. Tatli S, Acar M, Tuncali K, Morrison PR, Silverman S. Percutaneous cryoablation techniques and clinical applications. Diagn Interv Radiol 2010
  8. 90–95. [CrossRef] 8. Wang C, Wang H, Yang W, et al. Multicenter randomized controlled trial of percutaneous cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2015
  9. 1579–1590. [CrossRef] 9. Rong G, Bai W, Dong Z, et al. Long-term outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria. PLoS One 2015
  10. e0123065. [CrossRef] 10. Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, et al. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Kim GM, Won JY, Kim MD, et al. Cryoablation of hepatocellular carcinoma with high-risk for percutaneous ablation: safety and efficacy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016
  12. 1447–1454. [CrossRef] 12. Shah TT, Arbel U, Foss S, et al. Modeling cryotherapy ice ball dimensions and isotherms in a novel gel-based model to determine optimal cryo-needle configurations and settings for potential use in clinical practice. Urology 2016
  13. 234–240. [CrossRef] 13. Robertson D, Williams GH. Clinical and translational science: principles of human research: Academic Press, 2009: 182–190. [CrossRef] 14. Goldberg SN, Charboneau JW, Dodd GD, 3rd, et al. Image-guided tumor ablation: proposal for standardization of terms and reporting criter