Journals / Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler / 2017 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Social Sustainability in the Settlements under Pressure of Urban Sprawl: The Case of İncek in Ankara

Kentsel Yayılma Baskısı Altında Kalan Yerleşimlerde Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik: Ankara İncek Mahallesi Örneği

Pages
59–78
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study have revealed that urban renewal and new developments in İncek violate these headings of social sustainability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:New developments in urban settlements after urban renewal projects affect social sustainability of current social pattern.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the context of this study, it is aimed to investigate this problem by focusing on the case of İncek.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study have revealed that urban renewal and new developments in İncek violate these headings of social sustainability.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

New developments in urban settlements after urban renewal projects affect social sustainability of current social pattern. In the context of this study, it is aimed to investigate this problem by focusing on the case of İncek. To this end, drawing upon the results of literature review, social sustainability is discussed under five headings as social and environmental equity/justice, local characteristics and socio-cultural values, housing affordability and housing quality, engaged governance, social cohesion and community stability. The results of the study have revealed that urban renewal and new developments in İncek violate these headings of social sustainability.

Özet

Kentsel dönüşüm ve gelişme projeleri ile birlikte kent dokularında yaşanan yeni gelişmelerin, mevcut sosyal dokunun sürdürülebilirliğini etkilediği düşünülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın içeriği olarak, bu durum İncek Mahallesi kapsamında tartışılmaya çalışılmaktadır. Bu kapsamda yapılan yazın taraması çerçevesinde sosyal sürdürülebilirlik, sosyal ve çevresel eşitlik/adalet, yerel karakter ve sosyo-kültürel değerler, erişilebilir konut ve konut kalitesi, katılımcı yönetim, sosyal bütünlük ve toplumsal süreklilik olmak üzere beş başlık altında tartışılmaya çalışılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, İncek mahallesinde yaşanan kentsel dönüşümün ve yeni gelişmelerin sosyal sürdürülebilirliğin bu göstergelerini sağlamadığı sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YENİGÜL, S. B., ALKAN, L. G. (2017). Social Sustainability in the Settlements under Pressure of Urban Sprawl: The Case of İncek in Ankara. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 59–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/153107

References (12)

  1. Alkan, L., (2015), Gated Communities and Social Sustainability: A Case Study of Ankara. 2nd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts Sgem, p.423-430, Doi: 105593/sgemsocial2015B4 Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S., ve Brown, C. (2006), What is 'Socıal Sustaınabılıty', and How do our Existıng Urban Forms Perform in Nurturing it?, Plannİng Research Conference, Bartlett School of Planning, UCL, London. Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S., Brown, C., ve Watkins, D. (2009), Social Sustainability and Urban Form: Evidence From Five British Cities, Environment and Planning A, Vol.41, p.2125-2142.
  2. Bramley, G. ve Power, S. (2009), Urban Form and Social Sustainability: the Role of Density and Housing Type, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol.36, p.30-48.
  3. Chan, E. ve Lee, G. K. L. (2008), Critical Factors for Improving Social Sustainability of Urban Renewal Projects, Soc Indic Res, Vol.85, p.243-256.
  4. Chiu RLH. (2002),
  5. Sustainable Development, Social Sustainability and Housing Development: the Experience of Hong Kong. In Housing and Social Change: West Meets East, Forrest R, Lee J (eds). Routledge: London; in press. Cuthill, M. (2010), Strengthening the 'Social' in Sustainable Development: Developing a Conceptual Framework for Social Sustainability in a Rapid Urban Growth Region in Australia, Sust. Dev. Vol.18, p.362-373.
  6. Darchen, S. ve Ladouceur, E. (2013), Social Sustainability in Urban Regeneration Practice: A Case Study of the Fortitude Valley Renewal Plan in Brisbane, Australian Planner, Vol.50, No:4, p.340-350.
  7. Dempsey, N., Bramley, G. Power, S., ve Brown, C. (2011), The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability, Sust. Dev., Vol.19, p.289-300. https://www.ankara.bel.tr/genel-sekreter-yardimcisi/mar-ve-sehircilik-dairesi- baskanligi/metropoliten-nazim-mar-planlama-sube-mudurlugu/bazi-kentsel- donusum-ve-gelisim-proje-alanlari-hakkinda-genel-bilgi-ve-son-durum.html. 02.11.2016
  8. İncek Mahallesi Muhtarı (2016),
  9. Derinlemesine Görüşme, Abdullah Teber, 18.08.2016.
  10. Kaya, E., (2009), Kentsel Dönüşüm Projeleri ve Halk Katılımı, Toplum ve Demokrasi, 3 (6-7), Mayıs-Aralık, s. 203-216.
  11. Sharifi, A., ve Murayama, A. (2013a), Changes in the Traditional Urban form and the Social Sustainability of Contemporary Cities: A case study of Iranian cities, Habitat International, Vol.38, p.126-134.
  12. Sharifi, A., ve Murayama, A. (2013b), A Critical Review of Seven Selected Neighborhood Sustaina