SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Musicologist / 2025 / Volume: 9 Issue: SI Special Issue

Methodological Issues in Transnational Music Archive Research: The Case of Bulgarian Music Archives

Selin Sağıroğlu(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5723-8931
Abdullah Akat(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY, İSTANBUL CONSERVATOIRE)0000-0002-8045-2802
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings suggest that, particularly in countries like Bulgaria, the methodological challenges faced by music archives are not solely technical in nature but are deeply intertwined with political, institutional, and cultural factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Music archives emerged in the late 19th century with the development of sound recording technologies and have since faced a variety of challenges throughout their historical trajectory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:From the establishment of the Vienna Phonogrammarchiv in 1899 and the Berlin Phonogramm-Archiv in 1900 to the present day, nearly all music archives have struggled with numerous technical, political, and institutional problems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings suggest that, particularly in countries like Bulgaria, the methodological challenges faced by music archives are not solely technical in nature but are deeply intertwined with political, institutional, and cultural factors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bulgarian Turks · Music archive · Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Institute of Art Studies

Abstract

Music archives emerged in the late 19th century with the development of sound recording technologies and have since faced a variety of challenges throughout their historical trajectory. From the establishment of the Vienna Phonogrammarchiv in 1899 and the Berlin Phonogramm-Archiv in 1900 to the present day, nearly all music archives have struggled with numerous technical, political, and institutional problems. While early challenges centered on the preservation and storage of phonograph recordings, over time these were replaced by issues such as inadequate cataloging systems, lack of standardization, limited accessibility of archival materials, shortage of qualified personnel, unsuitable physical conditions for archival preservation, and difficulties in digitization processes. This study examines the methodological problems encountered in music archives through the case of two significant institutions in Bulgaria: the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and the Bulgarian National Radio. Methodological issues in ethnomusicological archival research are addressed under key themes including access policies, cataloging systems, digitization processes, questions of source reliability, and preservation of materials. This research, grounded in field experience, offers a spatial analysis of music archives with a particular focus on transnational archival practices. It explores the political and institutional barriers encountered in such contexts, the conditions under which documents and sound recordings are preserved, and the technical limitations of archival infrastructure and digital transformation processes. The study also highlights the pivotal role that archives play in the transmission of cultural heritage. The findings suggest that, particularly in countries like Bulgaria, the methodological challenges faced by music archives are not solely technical in nature but are deeply intertwined with political, institutional, and cultural factors.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sağıroğlu, S., Akat, A. (2025). Methodological Issues in Transnational Music Archive Research: The Case of Bulgarian Music Archives. Musicologist, Volume: 9 Issue: SI Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.33906/musicologist.1709891

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Acaroğlu, Mehmet Türker. (2006). Bulgaristan’da Türkçe Yer Adları Kılavuzu (Guide to Turkish Place Names in Bulgaria), Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları.
  2. Akat, Abdullah (2015) “Müzik Arşivleri” (Music Archives). Müzikte Araştırma Yöntemleri, Eds. Karahasanoğlu, Songül and Elif Damla Yavuz: pp. 41-58. İstanbul: İTÜ TMDK Yayınları.
  3. Bobcev, Stefan Savov, (1988). “Deliorman Türklerinin Kökeni” (The origin of the Deliorman Turks), (Mehmet Türker Acaroğlu, Trans.) Belleten Türk Tarih Kurumu 52(203).
  4. Danova, Diana; Kumichin, Maria. (2011). Music Folklore Archive Collection At The Institute of Art Studies, BAS in Sofia, Bulgaria, and Its Restoration and Digitization, Bulgaria: Преглед НЦД. 18(2011): 59-66.
  5. García Sudo, Alejandro. (2017). States of Disrepair and the Politics of Archival Neglect. Retrieved from https://ethnomusicologyreview.ucla.edu/content/states-disrepair-and-politics-archival-neglect
  6. Hacısalihoğlu, Mehmet; Ersoy Hacısalihoğlu, Neriman. (2012). 89 Göçü: Bulgaristan’da 1984-89 Azınlık Politikaları ve Türkiye’ye Zorunlu Göç (The 1989 Migration: Minority Policies in Bulgaria in 1984-89 and Forced Migration to Turkey). İstanbul: BALKAR & BALMED.
  7. Hirschkind, Charles. (2006). The Ethical Soundscape: Cassette Sermons and Islamic Counterpublics. Columbia University Press.
  8. IASA, (2017). The Safeguarding of the Audiovisual Heritage: Ethics, Principles and Preservation Strategy.
  9. İnalcık, Halil. (2005). “Türkler ve Balkanlar” (Turks and the Balkans). BAL-TAM Türklük Bilgisi Dergisi. 3, 20.
  10. Lechleitner, Gerda. (2010). “Prerequisities for the ‘Creation’ of Valuable Sound Recordings-Seen from the Archival Perspective,” Ed. Urban Bareis, Susanne Ziegler, Historical Sources and Source Criticism: pp. 31-41. Tallinna Raamatutrükikkoja OÜ.
  11. Lundberg, Dan. (2019). “Archives and Applied Ethnomusicology” Public Ethnomusicology, Education, Archives and Commerce, Ed. Svanibor Pettan, Jeff Todd Titon: pp. 189-227. Oxford University Press.
  12. McCollum, Jonathan; Hebert, David G. (2014). “Acknowledgment.” Theory and Method in Historical Ethnomusicology, Eds. Jonathan McCollum and David G. Hebert: pp. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  13. Nettl, Bruno. (1983). The Study of Ethnomusicology: Thirty-one Issues and Concepts, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  14. Pettan, Svanibor. (2008). “Applied Ethnomusicology and Empowerment Strategies: Views From Across the Atlantic”. Musicological Annual. 44 (1): 85-99.
  15. Rice, Timothy. (1987). “Toward the Remodeling of Ethnomusicology,” Ethnomusicology, 31 (3): 469-488.
  16. Sağıroğlu, Selin. (2024) “Bulgaristan Müzik Arşivlerindeki Türk Müziğine İlişkin Tarihi Ses Kaynaklarının Kataloglanması” (Cataloging Historical Sound Sources of Turkish Music in Bulgarian Music Archives), MA Thesis, İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul: Türkiye.
  17. Seeger, Anthony. (1996). “Ethnomusicologists, Archives, Professional Organizations, and the Shifting Ethics of Intellectual Property” Yearbook for Traditional Music, 28: 87-105.
  18. Şimşir, Bilal N. (2012). Bulgaristan Türkleri (Bulgarian Turks), Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi.
  19. Thram, Diane. (2014). “The Legacy of Music Archives in Historical Ethnomusicology: A Model for Engaged Ethnomusicology.” Theory and Method in Historical Ethnomusicology, Eds. Jonathan McCollum and David G. Hebert: pp. 309-336. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  20. Titon, Jeff, Todd. (2010). Applied Ethnomusicology: Historical and Contemporary Approaches. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Press
  21. UNESCO. (2023). UNESCO Archives: Preserving Our Heritage for Future Generations. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/archives
  22. Vlaeva, Ivanka. (2006). “Hybridity in Turkish Recordings from the 1960s in Bulgaria,” The Human World and Musical Diversity: Proceedings from the Fourth Meeting of the ICTM Study Group, Music and Minorities in Varna, Bulgaria (36-42). Sofia.
  23. Yalçın, Emruhan. (2009). “Türk-Bulgar Ortak Kültürü,” Ankara Üniversitesi Türk İnkılap Tarihi Enstitüsü Atatürk Yolu Dergisi, 11(43): 555-577.