SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi / 2018 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

The Impact of Keratinized Mucosa Width on Peri-implanter Soft Tissue Health

Keratinize Doku Bandı Genişliğinin İmplant Çevresi Dişeti Sağlığı Üzerine Etkisi

ÖNDER GÜRLEK
Pages
53–59
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: It has been observed that the keratinized tissue width around the implant effects the peri-implanter soft tissue health

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:INTRODUCTION: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the association between keratinized mucosa width (KMW) and peri-implant soft tissue health.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: In fifty-two patients, 176 implants with at least 1 year of function were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: It has been observed that the keratinized tissue width around the implant effects the peri-implanter soft tissue health
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the association between keratinized mucosa width (KMW) and peri-implant soft tissue health. METHODS: In fifty-two patients, 176 implants with at least 1 year of function were included in the study. Based on the width of keratinized mucosa on buccal surfaces, implants were divided into two groups: KMW≤ 2 mm and KMW> 2 mm. Clinical measurements of plaque index (PS), probing depths (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP), and supuration were performed. According to the clinical measurements and radiological evaluations, peri-implant soft tissue around the implants were classified as healthy, mucositis and peri-implantitis. RESULTS: There were 86 implants in the group with KMW> 2 mm and 90 implants in the group with KMW ≤ 2 mm. PD, CAL, PS, and BOP were found to be significantly lower in the group with KMW> 2 mm (p 0.05). Prevalence of periimplantitis was found significantly higher in the group with KDG ≤ 2mm (p> 0.05). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: It has been observed that the keratinized tissue width around the implant effects the peri-implanter soft tissue health

Özet

GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Çalışmanın amacı, keratinize doku bandı genişliği (KDG) ile implant çevresi yumuşak doku sağlığı arasındaki ilişkiyi değerlendirmektir. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Çalışmaya 52 hastada, fonksiyonel yüklemesi üzerinden en az 1 yıl geçmiş 176 implant dahil edildi. Bukkal yüzeylerde keratinize mukozanın genişliğine dayanarak, implantlar iki gruba ayrıldı: KDG 2mm. Plak skoru (PS), sondalama derinliği (SD), klinik ataşman kaybı (KAK), sondalamada kanama (KS) ve süpürasyonun klinik ölçümleri yapıldı. Yapılan klinik ölçümler ve radyolojik değerlendirmeler sonucunda implant çevresi dişeti sağlıklı, mukozitis ve peri-implantitis olarak sınıflandırıldı. BULGULAR: KDG > 2mm olan grupta 86 implant, KDG 2mm olan grupta SD, KAK, PS ve KS anlamlı şekilde daha az olduğu belirlenmiştir (p 0,05), periimplantitis prevelansı KDG 0,05). TARTIŞMA ve SONUÇ: İmplant çevresi keratinize doku genişliğinin, implant çevresi yumuşak doku sağlığı üzerine etkisi olduğu görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRLEK, Ö. (2018). The Impact of Keratinized Mucosa Width on Peri-implanter Soft Tissue Health. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 53–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/152838

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Mombelli A, Muller N, Cionca N. The epidemiology of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 6:67-76
  2. Lindhe J, Meyle J, Group DoEWoP. Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:282-285
  3. Lang NP, Berglundh T, Working Group 4 of Seventh European Workshop on P. Periimplant diseases: where are we now?--Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38 Suppl 11:178-181
  4. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:81-90
  5. Moon IS, Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Lindhe J. The barrier between the keratinized mucosa and the dental implant. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:658- 663
  6. Ikeda H, Shiraiwa M, Yamaza T, et al. Difference in penetration of horseradish peroxidase tracer as a foreign substance into the peri-implant or junctional epithelium of rat gingivae. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:243-251
  7. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Jonsson K, Ericsson I. The topography of the vascular systems in the periodontal and peri-implant tissues in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:189-193
  8. Wennstrom JL. Lack of association between width of attached gingiva and development of soft tissue recession. A 5-year longitudinal study. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:181-184
  9. Stetler KJ, Bissada NF. Significance of the width of keratinized gingiva on the periodontal status of teeth with submarginal restorations. J Periodontol 1987;58:696-700
  10. Adibrad M, Shahabuei M, Sahabi M. Significance of the width of keratinized mucosa on the health status of the supporting tissue around implants supporting overdentures. J Oral Implantol 2009;35:232-237
  11. Crespi R, Cappare P, Gherlone E. A 4-year evaluation of the peri-implant parameters of immediately loaded implants placed in fresh extraction sockets. J Periodontol 2010;81:1629- 1634
  12. Bouri A, Jr., Bissada N, Al-Zahrani MS, Faddoul F, Nouneh I. Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:323-326
  13. Wennstrom JL, Bengazi F, Lekholm U. The influence of the masticatory mucosa on the periimplant soft tissue condition. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:1-8
  14. Roos-Jansaker AM, Renvert H, Lindahl C, Renvert S. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. P