Journals / Ege Klinikleri Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3

The Effect Of Non-Closure of Peritoneum on the Postoperative Clinical Process of the Total Abdominal Hysterectomy With Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy

Total Abdominal Histerektomi ve Bilateral SalpingoOoferektomi Ameliyatlarında Peritonların Açık Bırakılmasının Kliniğe Etkisi

Pages
238–241
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When analgesic requirement was evaluated, analgesic requirement was statistically lower in the group with peritoneal non-closure than the group with peritoneal closure (p 0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of non-closure of visceral and parietal peritoneum on the postoperative clinical process in total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH BSO) operations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: One hundred fifty extrafascial TAH BSO cases with benign indications in a tertiary center from March 2001 to January 2004 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When analgesic requirement was evaluated, analgesic requirement was statistically lower in the group with peritoneal non-closure than the group with peritoneal closure (p 0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of non-closure of visceral and parietal peritoneum on the postoperative clinical process in total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH BSO) operations. Methods: One hundred fifty extrafascial TAH BSO cases with benign indications in a tertiary center from March 2001 to January 2004 were included in the study. Cases were divided into two groups as those with visceral and parietal non-closure (75 cases) and and those with closure (75 cases). Data were collected in terms of operative time, analgesic requirement, bowel functions and complications retrospectively and the groups were compared for differences statistically. Results: Out of 75 patients with visceral and parietal peritoneal non-closure, 2 (2.7%) on day 1, 18 (24.0%) on day 2, 73 (97.3%) on day 3 did not receive analgesic treatment. In the group with visceral and parietal peritoneal closure, there were no patients who did not receive analgesic treatment during three days postoperatively. When analgesic requirement was evaluated, analgesic requirement was statistically lower in the group with peritoneal non-closure than the group with peritoneal closure (p 0.05).

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, total abdominal histerektomi ve bilateral salpingoooferektomi (TAH BSO) operasyonlarında visseral ve parietal peritonun kapatılmamasının postoperatif klinik süreçteki etkisini araştırmaktır. Yöntem: Mart 2001 - Ocak 2004 tarihleri arasında, bir tersiyer merkezde, benign endikasyonlar ile uygulanmış 150 ekstrafasiyal TAH BSO olgusu çalışmaya alındı. Olgular visseral ve parietal peritonları kapatılan (75 olgu) ve kapatılmayan (75 olgu) olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Operasyon süresi, kullanılan analjezik madde tipi ve sıklığı, bağırsak fonksiyonları ve komplikasyon verileri hasta dosyalarından retrospektif olarak toplandı. Her iki grup farklılıklar bakımından karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Peritonları kapatılmayan grupta, postoperatif 1. günde 2' sinin (%2,7), 2. günde 18' nin (%24,0), 3. günde 73'ünün (%97,3) analjezik tedavi almadığı görüldü. Peritonları kapatılan grupta ise postoperatif üç günlük süreç içinde analjezik tedavi almayan hasta yoktu. Analjezik gereksinimi değerlendirildiğinde, peritonların kapatılmadığı grupta, analjezik gereksinimi, peritonların kapatıldığı gruptan istatistiksel anlamlı olarak daha düşüktü (p 0.05). Sonuç: TAH BSO operasyonlarında peritonların açık bırakılması, postoperatif süreçte komplikasyon sıklığını artırmadan analjezik ihtiyacını azaltmaktadır. Conclusion: Peritoneal non-closure in TAH BSO operations reduces the need for analgesics without increasing the frequency of complications in the postoperative period.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, A., YILDIZ, F., Çökmez, H. (2019). The Effect Of Non-Closure of Peritoneum on the Postoperative Clinical Process of the Total Abdominal Hysterectomy With Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy. Ege Klinikleri Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3, 238–241. https://ajindex.com/articles/152820

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alpay Z, Saed GM, Diamond MP. Postoperative adhesions: from formation to prevention. Semin Reprod Med. 2008;26(4):313-321
  2. Jenkins TR. It's time to challenge surgical dogma with evidence-based data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(2): 423-427
  3. Elkins TE, Stovall TG, Warren J, Ling FW, Meyer NL. A histological evaluation of peritoneal injury and repair: implications for adhesion formation. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:225-8
  4. Weerawetwat W, Buranawanich S, Kanawong M. Closure vs nonclosure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 years study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004;87(9): 1007-1011
  5. Kapustian V, Anteby EY, Gdalevich M, Shenhav S, Lavie O, Gemer O. Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(1): 56-e1
  6. Cheong YC, Premkumar G, Metwally M, Peacock JL, Li TC. To close or not to close? A systematic review and a meta-analysis of peritoneal non-closure and adhesion formation after caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;147(1):3-8
  7. Tulandi T, Al-Jaroudi D. Nonclosure of peritoneum: a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(2): 609-612
  8. Atabekoglu CS, Turkcuoglu I, Duru B, et al. Closure vs non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: evaluation of pain. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2011; 31(4): 307-310
  9. Al-Inany H. Peritoneal closure vs. non-closure: estimation of pelvic fluid by transvaginal Ultrasonography after abdominal hysterectomy. 2004; 58(4): 183-185
  10. Palazzetti PL, Cipriano L, Pachi A. Is peritoneal closure necessary after abdominal hysterectomy? Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2000;71(3): 255-256
  11. Kucuk M, Okman TK. Non‐closure of visceral peritoneum at abdominal hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;75(3): 317-319
  12. Bektasoglu HK, Hasbahceci M, Yigman S, Yardimci E, Kunduz E, Malya FU. Nonclosure of the Peritoneum during Appendectomy May Cause Less Postoperative Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study. Pain Res Manag. 2019: 1-6
  13. Eggemann H, Mitrik NA, Kabdebo O, Costa SD, Ignatov A. Peritoneal closure during laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(4):785-789
  14. Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short and longterm outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014: 8
  15. Karapineni RC, Wilk PJ, Danese CA: The role of the peritoneum in the healing of abdominal incisions. Surg.