Journals / Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Relationship between mentalizing abilities, attachment styles, anxiety and depressive symptom levels in fibromyalgia patients

Pages
113–120
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study may provide data for clinical applications using mentalization as a tool to understand and treat the patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia more efficiently.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate patients with fibromyalgia in terms of mentalizing abilities and to identify the relationships between mentalization skills, attachment styles, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in these patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: The sample consisted of 30 patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia and 30 healthy volunteers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study may provide data for clinical applications using mentalization as a tool to understand and treat the patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia more efficiently.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate patients with fibromyalgia in terms of mentalizing abilities and to identify the relationships between mentalization skills, attachment styles, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in these patients. Method: The sample consisted of 30 patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia and 30 healthy volunteers. Patients with fibromyalgia and the control group were both administered the following battery of tests: Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire–Revised (ECR-R), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Results: Fibromyalgia group and healthy controls differed significantly in terms of total scores of the RMET. The fibromyalgia group had significantly lower scores in terms of mentalization skills compared to healthy controls. The mean anxiety and depression scores of the fibromyalgia group were higher than in the healthy controls. The mean scores of anxiety and avoidance dimensions in the fibromyalgia group were not different from healthy controls. Conclusion: Fibromyalgia patients were found to have significantly lower mentalizing abilities compared to healthy controls. This study may provide data for clinical applications using mentalization as a tool to understand and treat the patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia more efficiently.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNANÇ, L., BODUR, N. E., PARLAK, S. Ç., SARIKAYA, M., SARI, A., GÜLEÇ, H., ÇITAK, S. (2019). Relationship between mentalizing abilities, attachment styles, anxiety and depressive symptom levels in fibromyalgia patients. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 113–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/152803

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Kaplan HI. History of psychosomatic medicine: emostions and cellular tissue: In Kaplan MD, Sadock BJ (editors). Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. Aydin H, Bozkurt A (Translation Editors) Eighth ed., Ankara: Gunes Basimevi Ltd. Sti., 2007, 2105-2112. (Turkish) McBeth J, Silman AJ. The role of psychiatric disorders in fibromyalgia. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2001; 3:157-164. Gur A. Etiopathogenesis in fibromyalgia. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2008; 54(Suppl.1):4-11. (Turkish) Lumley MA, Cohen JL, Borszcz GS, Cano A, Radcliffe AM, Porter LS, Schubiner H, Keefe FJ. Pain and emotion: a biopsychosocial review of recent research. J Clin Psychol 2011; 67:942-968. Parman T. History of psychosomatics and children’s psychosomatics. Psikanaliz Yazilari 2005; 11:16-17. (Turkish) Gubb K. Psychosomatics today: a review of contemporary theory and practice. Psychoanal Rev 2013; 100:103-142.
  2. Pedrosa Gil F, Weigl M, Wessels T, Irnich D, Baumüller E, Winkelmann A. Parental bonding and alexithymia in adults with fibromyalgia. Psychosomatics 2008; 49:115-122.
  3. Abu-Akel A, Shamay-Tsoory S. Neuroanatomical and neurochemical bases of theory of mind. Neuropsychologia 2011; 49:2971-2984.
  4. Sayin A, Candansayar S. Theory of mind in schizophrenia. New Symposium 2008; 46:74-80. (Turkish) Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 1985; 21:37-46.
  5. Fonagy P, Gergely G, Jurist EL, Target M. Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self. New York: Other Press, 2002, 55. Choi-Kain LW, Gunderson JG. Mentalization: ontogeny, assessment, and application in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165:1127-1135.
  6. Ozturk MO, Ulusahin A. Mental Health and Disorders. Eleventh ed., Ankara: Tuna Matbaacilik San. ve Tic. A.S., 2008; 610-612. (Turkish) Govender C, Cassimjee N, Schoeman J, Meyer H. Psychological characteristics of FMS patients. Scand J Caring Sci 2009; 23:76-83.
  7. Di Tella M, Castelli L, Colonna F, Fusaro E, Torta R, Ardito RB, Adenzato M. Theory of mind and emotional functioning in fibromyalgia syndrome: an investigation of the relationship between social cognition and executive function. PloS One 2015; 10:e0116542. Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I. The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test” revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or highfunctioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2001; 42:241-251. Yildirim