SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Medical Records / 2024 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3

Evaluation of YouTube Videos for Learning Interfascial Plane Blocks

Muhammed Halit Satıcı(Konya Şehir Hastanesi)0009-0005-0652-3624
Pages
317–323
Publication Date
2024-09-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it is more accurate and reliable for researchers to obtain medical information from reliable sources, academic articles, or publications of official medical institutions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The internet and social media are becoming integral to our lives today.
📊
Key Findings & Data:YouTube was founded in 2005 and can be helpful in health matters by providing quick and easy access to medical information.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it is more accurate and reliable for researchers to obtain medical information from reliable sources, academic articles, or publications of official medical institutions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Analgesia · regional anesthesia · interfascial plane block

Abstract

Aim: The internet and social media are becoming integral to our lives today. YouTube was founded in 2005 and can be helpful in health matters by providing quick and easy access to medical information. However, the reliability of medical videos on YouTube could be improved. Many videos on YouTube about interfascial plane blocks are widely used for analgesic purposes in anesthesia practice. In order to avoid causing incorrect and incomplete information and to prevent information pollution, interfascial plan block videos on YouTube should be examined. Therefore, this study evaluated the educational content and preparation quality of the interfascial plan block videos on YouTube. Material and Method: Educational videos of eight different interfascial plane block types on YouTube were evaluated using two surveys. Each survey consists of 14 questions. Each question receives a score between 0 and 5. Each video receives a total score between 0 and 70 for each survey. Results: A statistically significant positive correlation exists between video educational quality scores and video characteristics. A statistically significant positive correlation exists between the video preparation quality score and video characteristics. As the number of video views increases, the video quality score increases. Conclusion: Although YouTube contains medical training videos, their reliability is questioned. Therefore, it is more accurate and reliable for researchers to obtain medical information from reliable sources, academic articles, or publications of official medical institutions.

🔖

Cite This Article

Satıcı, M. H. (2024). Evaluation of YouTube Videos for Learning Interfascial Plane Blocks. Medical Records, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 317–323. https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1475153

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. YouTube Statistics. URL: https://www.youtube.com/yt/press/statistics.html access date 15.11.2023
  2. Staunton PF, Baker JF, Green J, Devitt A. Online curves: a quality analysis of scoliosis videos on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:1857-61.
  3. Azer SA, Algrain HA, AlKhelaif RA, AlEshaiwi SM. Evaluation of the educational value of YouTube videos about physical examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e241.
  4. Ng FK, Wallace S, Coe B, et al. From smartphone to bed-side: exploring the use of social media to disseminate recommendations from the National Tracheostomy Safety Project to front-line clinical staff. Anaesthe. 2020;75:227-33.
  5. Romanov K, Nevgi A. Do medical students watch video clips in eLearning and do these facilitate learning?. Med Teach. 2007;29:484-8.
  6. Yıldırım B, Basaran O, Alatas OD, et al. Chest tube insertion techniques on YouTube: is social media a reliable source of learning medical skills?. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33:1709-10.
  7. Butler DP, Perry F, Shah Z, Leon-Villapalos J. The quality of video information on burn first aid available on YouTube. Burns. 2013;39:856-9.
  8. Hansen C, Interrante JD, Ailes EC, et al. Assessment of YouTube videos as a source of information on medication use in pregnancy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25:35–44.
  9. Mueller SM, Jungo P, Cajacob L, et al. The absence of evidence is evidence of non-sense: cross-sectional study on the quality of psoriasis-related videos on YouTube and their reception by health seekers. J Med Int. 2019;21:e11935.
  10. Hsin WJ, Cigas J. Short videos improve student learning in online education. J Comput Sci Coll. 2013;28:253-9.
  11. De Cassai A, Correale C, Sandei L, et al. Quality of erector spinae plane block educational Videos on a popular Video-sharing platform. Cureus. 2019;11:e4204.
  12. Tulgar S, Selvi O, Serifsoy TE, et al. YouTube as an information source of spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia and combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017;67:493-9.
  13. Tewfik GL, Work AN, Shulman SM, Discepola P. Objective validation of YouTube™ educational videos for the instruction of regional anesthesia nerve blocks: a novel approach. BMC anesthesiology. 2020;20:168.
  14. Turhan S, Ekici AA. YouTube as an information source of Transversus abdominis plane block. Turk J Clin Lab. 2023;2:216-21.
  15. Selvi O, Tulgar S, Senturk O, et al. YouTube as an informational source for brachial plexus blocks: evaluation of content and educational value. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2019;69:168-76.
  16. National Career Development Association (NCDA) guidelines for the preparation and evaluation of video career media. (2019). https://www.ncda.org/aws/NCDA/asset_manager/get_file/3401 access date 18.02.2019
  17. Arslan B, Sugur T, Ciloglu O, et al. A cross-sectional study analyzing the quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for COVID-19 intubation. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022;72:302-5.
  18. Gomes SH. YouTube in pediatric anesthesia induction. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:801-2.
  19. Turhan VB, Ünsal A. Evaluation of the quality of videos on hemorrhoidal disease on YouTube™. Turk J Colorectal Dis. 2021;31:261-7.
  20. Gonzalez-Estrada A, Cuervo-Pardo L, Ghosh B, et al. Popular on YouTube: a critical appraisal of the educational quality of information regarding asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015;36:e121-6.
  21. Sorensen JA, Pusz MD, Brietzke SE. YouTube as an information source for pediatric adenotonsillectomy and ear tube surgery. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78:65-70.
  22. Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan HF. YouTube as a patient-information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2016;49:1194-200.
  23. Tackett S, Slinn K, Marshall T, et al. Medical education videos for the world. An analysis of viewing patterns for a YouTube channel. Acad Med. 2018;93:1150-6.