Journals / Medical Records / 2026 / Sayı: 1

Evaluating the Code Blue Call System's Effectiveness at Balıkesir University Faculty of Medicine Hospital

Ramazan Kıyak(BALIKESİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-8866-8595
Gökhan Taşkın(BALIKESİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0009-0001-3627-6450
Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2026-01-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this direction, it would be appropriate to provide regular trainings within the institution and to increase the competence of healthcare professionals in emergency intervention processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Code blue is a code system that aims to increase the success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by intervening quickly and on-site in cases of cardiac arrest in hospitals today.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Code blue calls performed in 2020-2024 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this direction, it would be appropriate to provide regular trainings within the institution and to increase the competence of healthcare professionals in emergency intervention processes.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2020-2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Code blue · cardiopulmonary resuscitation · cardiac arrest

Abstract

Aim: Code blue is a code system that aims to increase the success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by intervening quickly and on-site in cases of cardiac arrest in hospitals today. In our study, code blue applications, reasons for the call, and interventions performed in Balıkesir University Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Material and Method: Code blue calls performed in 2020-2024 were retrospectively analyzed. In the study, demographic data, reasons for the call, units where the call was made, and data on the processes developed in patients undergoing CPR were analyzed. Results: The data of 142 patients were included in the study. It was determined that 53.5% of the calls were male, the total number of applicants was between 17-95 years old, the mean age was 62.11 years old, and the highest number of calls was in the 60-69 age range (24.6%). The majority of calls were made between 11 and 12 a.m. (18.3%), and the majority were made on Mondays (21.8%) and Tuesdays (21.8%). It was observed that most of the calls were made in inpatient wards (n=69). 48 patients underwent CPR, and 30 patients were successfully resuscitated. Arrest was the most common reason for code blue 33.8% (n=48), syncope 20.4% (n=29), and hypotension 16.2% (n=23) were the other common complaints. It was observed that 39.4% of the code blue calls resulted in emergency observation, 28.2% were referred to the intensive care unit, and 19% were unfollowed up. The exitus rate was 12.7%. Conclusion: A favorable outcome in code blue applications is possible only if the situations that may cause cardiac arrest are identified early and intervened and prevented, and this is of great importance. In this direction, it would be appropriate to provide regular trainings within the institution and to increase the competence of healthcare professionals in emergency intervention processes.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kıyak, R., Taşkın, G. (2026). Evaluating the Code Blue Call System's Effectiveness at Balıkesir University Faculty of Medicine Hospital. Medical Records, Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1657897

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bradley SM, Liu W, Chan PS, et al. Duration of resuscitation efforts for in-hospital cardiac arrest by predicted survival outcomes: insights from get with the guidelines-resuscitation. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2015;8:A322-A322.
  2. Adamski J, Nowakowski P, Goryński P, Onichimowski D, Weigl W. Incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrest in Poland. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2016;48:288-93.
  3. Andersen LW, Holmberg MJ, Berg KM, Donnino MW, Granfeldt A. In-hospital cardiac arrest: a review. JAMA. 2019;321:1200-10.
  4. Ohbe H, Tagami T, Uda K, Matsui H, Yasunaga H. Incidence and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan 2011–2017: a nationwide inpatient database study. J Intensive Care. 2022;10:10.
  5. Kılıç NT, Kuvaki B, Özbilgin Ş, İncesu M. Evaluation of code blue at Dokuz Eylul University, Medical Faculty Hospital. Türk Resüsitasyon Dergisi. 2022;1:19-34.
  6. Canural R, Gökalp N, Yıldırım K, et al. Sağlık hizmetlerinde hasta güvenliği: mavi kod uygulaması. Uluslararası Sağlıkta Performans ve Kalite Kongresi Bildirileri Kitabı, Volume 2. TR Ministry of Health. 19-21 Mart 2009, Antalya, 105-10.
  7. Özbilgin Ş, Çalış B, Çirkinoğlu GG, Kuvaki B. Evaluation of code blue. Türk Resüsitasyon Dergisi. 2023;2:94-109.
  8. Factora F, Maheshwari K, Khanna S, et al. Effect of a rapid response team on the incidence of in-hospital mortality. Anesth Analg. 2022;135:595-604.
  9. Keleş GT, Özbilgin Ş, Uğur L, et al. Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation conditions in Turkey: current status of code blue. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2021;49:30-6.
  10. Özmete Ö. Results of a blue code implementation at a university hospital. Cukurova Medical Journal. 2017;42:446-50.
  11. Akbudak İH, Erdoğan Ç. Overview of code blue application in a university hospital: how realistic are we, what should we do?. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer. 2023;13:333-6.
  12. Nolan JP, Soar J, Smith GB, et al. Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit. Resuscitation. 2014;85:987-92.
  13. Topeli Iskit A. Evaluation of the process and outcomes of the code blue implementation for cardiopulmonary arrest at Hacettepe University Sıhhiye Campus. Master’s thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara, 2016.
  14. Özütürk B, Muhammedoglu N, Dal E, Çaliskan B. Evaluation of code blue implementation outcomes. Med Bull Haseki 2015;53:204-8