Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2019 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft and four-strand hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Pages
45–49
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Primary ACL reconstruction with a single loop freeze-dried irradiated tibialis anterior allograft revealed comparable results with four-strand hamstring autograft in non-athlete patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery with either hamstring autograft or freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft, which performed by the same surgeon using the same fixation technique.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this retrospective study, patients who had primary ACL reconstruction using either fourstrand hamstring autograft (FSH) or freeze-dried irradiated tibialis anterior allograft (FDT) between 2012 and 2015 were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Primary ACL reconstruction with a single loop freeze-dried irradiated tibialis anterior allograft revealed comparable results with four-strand hamstring autograft in non-athlete patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery with either hamstring autograft or freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft, which performed by the same surgeon using the same fixation technique. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients who had primary ACL reconstruction using either fourstrand hamstring autograft (FSH) or freeze-dried irradiated tibialis anterior allograft (FDT) between 2012 and 2015 were evaluated. Patients who were skeletally mature with a minimum follow-up of 24 months and who had no previous surgery from the affected knee were included; patients who had multiple ligament injuries or chondral lesions over Outerbridge grade 2 were excluded from the study. Patients were grouped according to the graft type used in ACL reconstruction. Tegner activity scale and Lysholm knee scoring scale were used to assess patients' activity levels and functional status preoperatively and at the final follow-up. KT-2000 arthrometer measurements were done at the final follow-up to evaluate anterior laxity. Results: There were 27 patients (mean age 27 ± 8.9 years) in the FSH group and 36 patients (mean age 27.1 ± 6.7 years) in the FDTgroup. The mean follow-uptimewas 38.2 ± 3.5 months for the FSH group and 41 ± 6.1 months for the FDTgroup. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups when preoperative and postoperative Tegner-Lysholm scores were compared (Tegner P ¼ 0.583, 0.742; Lysholm P¼0.592, 0.249). The mean anteroposteriorlaxityand side-to-side differences measured by KT2000 were 4.1 mm and 2.1 mm for the FSH group, respectively; 4.2 mm and 2.2 mm for the FDT group, respectively. There was not a statistically significant difference (P ¼ 0.745, 0.562 respectively). Conclusions: Primary ACL reconstruction with a single loop freeze-dried irradiated tibialis anterior allograft revealed comparable results with four-strand hamstring autograft in non-athlete patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

ISSIN, A., ÖNER, A., SOFU, H., YURTEN, H. (2019). Comparison of freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft and four-strand hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1, 45–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/152565

References (5)

  1. West RV, Harner CD. Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(3):197e207. https://doi.org/10.5435/ 00124635-200505000-00006.
  2. Mehran N, Moutzouros V, Bill, Bedi A. A review of current graft options for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. JBJS Rev. 2015;3(11):1. https:// doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00009. ReinhardtKR, HetsroniI, MarxRG. Graft selectionforanteriorcruciate ligament reconstruction: a level I systematic review comparing failure rates and functional outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41(2):249e262. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.12.009. Rose MB, Domes C, Farooqi M, Crawford DC. A prospective randomized comparison of two distinct allogenic tissue constructs for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2016;23(6):1112e1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee. 2016.08.011. Foster TE, Wolfe BL, Ryan S, Silvestri L, Krall Kaye E. Does the graft source really matter in the outcome of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(1):189e199. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0363546509356530. Marrale J, Morrissey MC, Haddad FS. A literature review of autograft and allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(6):690e704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0236-1.
  3. Carey JL, Dunn WR, Dahm DL, Zeger SL, Spindler KP. A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(9):2242e2250. https://doi.org/10.2106/ JBJS.I.00610. Mahirogullari M, Ferguson CM, Whitlock PW, Stabile KJ, Poehling GG. Freezedried allografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 2007;26(4):625e637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2007.06.011.
  4. Duchman KR, Lynch TS, Spindler KP. Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament surgery: who gets what and why? Clin Sports Med. 2017;36(1):25e33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2016.08.013.
  5. Niu Y, Niu C, Wang X, et al. Improved ACL reconstruction outcome using double-layer BPTB allograft compared to that using four-strand hamstring tendon allograft. Knee. 2016;23(6):1093e1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee. 2016.06.015. Park SSH, Dwyer T, Congiusta F, Whelan DB, Theodoropoulos J. Analysis of irradiation on the clinical effectiveness of allogenic tissue when used for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(1): 226e235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513518004.