Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5

Radiomics-based nomogram using CT imaging for noninvasive preoperative prediction of early recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Pages
411–419
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

RESULTS The radiomics signature stratified patients into low-risk and high-risk, which showed significant difference in recurrence-free survival and overall survival (P ≤ 0.01).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE The aim of this study was to develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on radiomics features and clinical data for the noninvasive preoperative prediction of early recurrence (≤2 years) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS We enrolled 262 HCC patients who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and curative resection (training cohort, n=214; validation cohort, n=48).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:RESULTS The radiomics signature stratified patients into low-risk and high-risk, which showed significant difference in recurrence-free survival and overall survival (P ≤ 0.01).
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on radiomics features and clinical data for the noninvasive preoperative prediction of early recurrence (≤2 years) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS We enrolled 262 HCC patients who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and curative resection (training cohort, n=214; validation cohort, n=48). We applied propensity score matching (PSM) to eliminate redundancy between clinical characteristics and image features, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to prevent overfitting. Next, a radiomics signature, clinical nomogram, and combined clinical-radiomics nomogram were built to predict early recurrence, and we compared the performance and generalization of these models. RESULTS The radiomics signature stratified patients into low-risk and high-risk, which showed significant difference in recurrence-free survival and overall survival (P ≤ 0.01). Multivariable analysis identified dichotomized radiomics signature, alpha-fetoprotein, and tumor number and size as key early recurrence indicators, which were incorporated into clinical and radiomics nomograms. The radiomics nomogram showed the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with significantly superior predictive performance over the clinical nomogram in the training cohort (0.800 vs. 0.716, respectively; P = 0.001) and the validation cohort (0.785 vs. 0.654, respectively; P = 0.039). CONCLUSION The radiomics nomogram is a noninvasive preoperative biomarker for predicting early recurrence in patients with HCC. This model may be of clinical utility for guiding surveillance follow-ups and identifying optimal interventional strategies.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZHU, H., ZHENG, Z., ZHAO, H., ZHANG, J., ZHU, H., LI, Y., DONG, Z., XIAO, L., KUANG, J., ZHANG, X., LIU, L. (2020). Radiomics-based nomogram using CT imaging for noninvasive preoperative prediction of early recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5, 411–419. https://ajindex.com/articles/152503

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2016
  2. 115–132. [Crossref] 2. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2018
  3. 182–236. 3. Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2018
  4. 1301–1314. [Crossref] 4. Furuta M, Ueno M, Fujimoto A, et al. Whole genome sequencing discriminates hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic metastasis from multi-centric tumors. J Hepatol 2017
  5. 363–373. [Crossref] 5. Tabrizian P, Jibara G, Shrager B, Schwartz M, Roayaie S. Recurrence of hepatocellular cancer after resection: patterns, treatments, and prognosis. Ann Surg 2015
  6. 947–955. [Crossref] 6. Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Tanaka E, et al. Risk factors contributing to early and late phase intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. J Hepatol 2003
  7. 200–207. [Crossref] 7. Portolani N, Coniglio A, Ghidoni S, et al. Early and late recurrence after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: prognostic and therapeutic implications. Ann Surg 2006
  8. 229–235. [Crossref] 8. Chan AWH, Zhong J, Berhane S, et al. Development of pre and post-operative models to predict early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection. J Hepatol 2018
  9. 1284–1293. [Crossref] 9. Huang G, Li PP, Lau WY, et al. Antiviral therapy reduces hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in patients with low HBV-DNA levels: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2018
  10. 943–954. [Crossref] 10. Dhanasekaran R, Nault JC, Roberts LR, Zucman-Rossi J. Genomic medicine and implications for hepatocellular carcinoma prevention and therapy. Gastroenterology 2019
  11. 492–509. [Crossref] 11. Dong LQ, Peng LH, Ma LJ, et al. Heterogeneous immunogenomic features and distinct escape mechanisms in multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2020
  12. 896–908. [Crossref] 12. Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017
  13. 749–762. [Crossref] 13. Bi WL, Hosny A, Schabath MB, et al. Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer J Clin 2019
  14. 127–157. [Crossref] 14. Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT, et al. Decoding tumor phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nature communications 2014
  15. [Crossref] 15. Zhou Y, He L, Huang Y, et al.