SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Litera: Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1

Tony Harrison’s Adaptation of Phaedra’s Moral Conflict: Phaedra Britannica

Florentina Gümüş(ATATURK UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3327-0221
Pages
85–104
Publication Date
2022-05-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Unlike Euripides, who is ambiguous about the role of gods, goddesses and fate, Harrison makes it clear that the characters’ attempts at assigning blame to other people or to the gods of the colonised territory is simply their way of deflecting responsibility for the tragic events.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This essay sets out to discuss Tony Harrison’s play Phaedra Britannica (1975) by drawing primarily on Linda Hutcheon’s views as expressed in her theory of adaptation and Harrison’s own insights into adaptation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this discussion, Phaedra Britannica as an adaptation of Jean Racine’s Phèdre (1677), is understood as the outcome of an evolutionary process which started with ancient cultures and, at the same time, as an autonomous work.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Unlike Euripides, who is ambiguous about the role of gods, goddesses and fate, Harrison makes it clear that the characters’ attempts at assigning blame to other people or to the gods of the colonised territory is simply their way of deflecting responsibility for the tragic events.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Transcultural adaptation · moral emotions · Phaedra

Abstract

This essay sets out to discuss Tony Harrison’s play Phaedra Britannica (1975) by drawing primarily on Linda Hutcheon’s views as expressed in her theory of adaptation and Harrison’s own insights into adaptation. In this discussion, Phaedra Britannica as an adaptation of Jean Racine’s Phèdre (1677), is understood as the outcome of an evolutionary process which started with ancient cultures and, at the same time, as an autonomous work. In order to make the story of Phaedra relevant for contemporary audiences, Harrison sets his play in a colonial context, during the British occupation of India. This essay addresses the adaptation of the play through the moral conflict associated with the story of Phaedra, a woman in love with her stepson Hippolytus, with a focus on shame and guilt. Throughout the centuries, these moral concepts have played a significant role in the story. The culture in Racine’s Phèdre has been described as one dominated by guilt, but in Harrison’s play a return to the shame culture depicted in Hippolytus by Euripides can be observed. Unlike Euripides, who is ambiguous about the role of gods, goddesses and fate, Harrison makes it clear that the characters’ attempts at assigning blame to other people or to the gods of the colonised territory is simply their way of deflecting responsibility for the tragic events.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gümüş, F. (2022). Tony Harrison’s Adaptation of Phaedra’s Moral Conflict: Phaedra Britannica. Litera: Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1, 85–104. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2021-895098

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Agard, W. R. (1933). Fate and Freedom in Greek Tragedy. The Classical Journal, 29(2), 117-126. google scholar
  2. Benedict, R. (1934). Anthropology and the Abnormal. Journal of General Psychology, 10. google scholar
  3. Benedict, R. (1947). The chrysanthemum and the sword: Patterns of Japanese culture. London: Secker & Warburg. google scholar
  4. Brandt, G. (2001). Lust in Action: The Faces of Phaedra. C. A. Mayer Memorial Lecture. google scholar
  5. Calcamp, K. (2016). Reflections of Hippolytus: An Examination of Sexuality through Adaptation. Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism, 31(1), 109-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dtc.2016.0024. google scholar
  6. Corrigan, T. (2017). Defining Adaptation. In T. Leitch (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Adaptation Studies. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  7. Euripides. (2009). Hippolytus. (T. Wertenbaker, Trans.). London: Faber and Faber. (Original work dates back to 428 BC) google scholar
  8. Gerard, A. S. (1993). The Phaedra syndrome: Of shame and guilt in drama. Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi. google scholar
  9. Hard, R. (2004). The Routledge handbook of Greek mythology. London and New York: Routledge. google scholar
  10. Harrison, T. (2002). Phaedra Britannica. London: Faber and Faber. (First performed in 1975). Retrieved March 02, 2020, from http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780571285983.00000011. google scholar
  11. Homer. (1725). The Odyssey. (A. Pope, Trans.). (Original work dates back to the 8th century BC) Retrieved October 18, 2020, from https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3160/3160-0.txt. google scholar
  12. Huk, R. (1993). Postmodern Classics: The Verse Drama of Tony Harrison. In J. Acheson (Ed.), British and Irish Drama since 1960s. London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  13. Hutcheon, L. (2006). A theory ofAdaptation. London and New York: Routledge. google scholar
  14. Kovacs, D. (1980). Shame, Pleasure, and Honor in Phaedra’s Great Speech (Euripides, Hippolytus 375-87). The American Journal of Philology, 101(3), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.2307/294268. google scholar
  15. Marshall, H. (2009). The Hughes Version: Commercial Considerations and Dramatic Imagination. In R. Rees (Ed.), Ted Hughes and the Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  16. Messer, A. A. (1969). The Phaedra complex. Archives of general psychiatry, 21(2), 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1001/ archpsyc.1969.01740200085012. google scholar
  17. O’Hear, A. (1976). Guilt and shame as moral concepts. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Vol. 77, pp. 7386). Aristotelian Society, Wiley. google scholar
  18. Ploix, C. (2018). Reterritorialization and aesthetic transformations: the case of Tony Harrison’s Phaedra Britannica and The Misanthrope. Perspectives, 26(4), 478-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2018.1467472. google scholar
  19. Poore, B. (2012). Heritage, Nostalgia and Modern British Theatre. Staging the Victorians. London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  20. Racine, J. (2001). Phedra. (J. Rose, Trans.). London: Nick Hern Books. (Originally published in 1677). google scholar
  21. Racine, J. (2015). Phedre. (First published in 1677). Retrieved August 08, 2020 from https://www.theatre-classique.fr/pages/pdf/RACINE_PHEDRE.pdf. google scholar
  22. Sanders, J. (2006). Appropriation and Adaptation. London and New York: Routledge. google scholar
  23. Sarna, N. M. (1989). Genesis: the JPS Torah Commentary. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society. google scholar
  24. Seneca, L. A. (1907). Hippolytus or Phaedra. (F. J. Miller, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work dates back to 50 CE). google scholar
  25. Tale of Two Brothers. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from Internet Archive https://archive.org/details/ taletwobrothers00moldgoog/page/n104/mode/2up. google scholar
  26. Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York and London: The Guilford Press. google scholar
  27. The Guardian. (1 April 2000). Man of Mysteries. Retrieved November 20, 2020, from https://www.theguardian. com/books/2000/apr/01/poetry.theatre. google scholar
  28. The National Theatre Archive. Phaedra Britannica. Retrieved September 17, 2021, from http://catalogue. google scholar
  29. nationaltheatre.org.uk/CalmView/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Performance&id=322. google scholar
  30. The National Theatre Archive. The Misanthrope. Retrieved September 17, 2021, from http://catalogue. nationaltheatre.org.uk/CalmView/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Performance&id=302. google scholar
  31. Wertenbaker, T. (1989). The Love of the Nightingale. London: Faber and Faber. google scholar
  32. Winston, J. (1995). Re-Casting the Phaedra Syndrome: Myth and Morality in Timberlake Wertenbaker’s The Love of the Nightingale. Modern Drama, 38, 510-519. https://doi.org/10.3138/md.38.4.510. google scholar
  33. Tale of Two Brothers. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from Internet Archive https://archive.org/details/ taletwobrothers00moldgoog/page/n104/mode/2up. google scholar