SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Litera: Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 32 Sayı: 2

Tracing the Image of Turks in Travel Writing through Translation

Seda İlmek(Trakya Üniversitesi)0000-0002-3819-7254
Pages
813–832
Publication Date
2023-01-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, the analysis suggests that the translator, as an intercultural agent, seemed to claim his position as an author-translator in the translation process while particularly illustrating the function of gatekeeping and the use of translation for selecting and highlighting the representation of mental pictures of a certain culture and period

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main aim of this study is to examine how the images of Turks were depicted in the travel writing A Journey through the Crimea to Constantinople, written by the English traveler Elizabeth Craven, and to trace their repatriation into Turkish through translation entitled 1786’da Türkiye (Turkey in 1786) by the translator Reşat Ekrem Koçu.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This, naturally, leads the text with a pejorative tone towards the Turks to be rewritten as a target text having a commendatory tone due to the presence of a plethora of positive Turkish imagery along with the paratextual additions such as several illustrations, comments, the translator’s preface, and the publisher’s note.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, the analysis suggests that the translator, as an intercultural agent, seemed to claim his position as an author-translator in the translation process while particularly illustrating the function of gatekeeping and the use of translation for selecting and highlighting the representation of mental pictures of a certain culture and period
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Turks · images · travel writing

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to examine how the images of Turks were depicted in the travel writing A Journey through the Crimea to Constantinople, written by the English traveler Elizabeth Craven, and to trace their repatriation into Turkish through translation entitled 1786’da Türkiye (Turkey in 1786) by the translator Reşat Ekrem Koçu. This study benefits from an imagological perspective in its methodology and applies a comparative textual analysis, which puts a particular emphasis on the abundance of negative images of Turks in the source text and reflects the scarcity of such images in the target text. The analysis, from an imagological lens, shows that the hetero-images of Turks, which were mostly constructed through negative implications by the foreign writer, were lost in their repatriation to their own culture. In other words, the negative images of Turks were largely omitted from the target text, and the source text was abridged to a large extent by the Turkish translator, revealing the fact that the Other’s negative views about the Turks could not cross the borders at all. This, naturally, leads the text with a pejorative tone towards the Turks to be rewritten as a target text having a commendatory tone due to the presence of a plethora of positive Turkish imagery along with the paratextual additions such as several illustrations, comments, the translator’s preface, and the publisher’s note. Therefore, the analysis suggests that the translator, as an intercultural agent, seemed to claim his position as an author-translator in the translation process while particularly illustrating the function of gatekeeping and the use of translation for selecting and highlighting the representation of mental pictures of a certain culture and period

🔖

Cite This Article

İlmek, S. (2023). Tracing the Image of Turks in Travel Writing through Translation. Litera: Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 2, 813–832. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2021-1040310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Basnett, S., & Lefevere, A. (1998). Constructing cultures: Essays on literary translation. Multilingual Matters. google scholar
  2. Bayrı, M. H. (1939). Türkiye seyahatnameleri. Yeni eserlere dair düşünceler. Yeni Türk, 74, 65-68. google scholar
  3. Beller, M. & Leerssen, J. (Eds.). (2007). Imagology: the cultural construction and literary representation of national characters: A critical survey. Rodopi. google scholar
  4. Berk, Ö. (2006). Translating the “West”: The position of translated Western literature within the Turkish literary polysystem. RiLUnE, 4, 1-18. google scholar
  5. Craven, E. (1789). A journey through the Crimea to Constantinople in a series of letters from the right honorable Elizabeth Lady Craven, to his serene highness the margrave of Brandebourg, Anspach and Bareith. Written in the Year MDCCLXXXVI. Chamberlaine, R. Moncrieffe, W. Colles, G. Burnet, W. Wilson [and 7 others in Dublin]. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/ecco/004838538.0001.000?view=toc. google scholar
  6. . (1939). 1786’da Türkiye. (R. E. Koçu, Çev.) Serteller Matbaası, Çığır Kitabevi. google scholar
  7. Demirkol Ertürk, Ş. (2013). Images of Istanbul in translation: A case study in Slovenia. Across Languages and Cultures, 4(2), 199-220. google scholar
  8. Erkazancı Durmuş, H. (2021a). Constructing images through the Ottoman translation practices of the late nineteenth century: The case of Ahmet Midhat’s Diplomalı Kız. In. A. Ö. Tarakcıoğlu & E. Ersözlü (Eds.), Synergy III: Challenges into translation (pp. 51-66). Peter Lang. google scholar
  9. . (2021b). Ahmet Midhat’ın Fenni bir roman yahut Amerika doktorları adlı eserine çeviribilim ve imgebilim ilişkisi bağlamında bir bakış. In Ş. Okyayuz (Ed.), Çeviri(bilim)de yeni açılımlar (pp. 83-108). Siyasal Kitabevi. google scholar
  10. Flynn, P., Leerssen, J. & van Doorslaer, L. (2016). On translated images, stereotypes and disciplines. In P. Flynn, J. Leerssen and L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Interconnecting translation studies and imagology (pp. 1-18). John Benjamins. google scholar
  11. Gentile, P., Kovacs, F. & van der Watt, M. (Eds.). (2021). Transnational image building: Linking up translation studies, reception studies and imagology. Special issue of Translation Spaces, 10(1). pp.1-4. google scholar
  12. Gheorghio, O.-C. (2018). Imagology and Translation: Rendering the Other’s perspective on Romanianness. Translation studies: Retrospective and prospective views, 21, 67-79. google scholar
  13. Kuran-Burçoğlu, N. (2000). At the crossroads of translation studies and imagology. In A. Chesterman, N. G. San Salvador & Y. Gambier (Eds.), Translation in context (pp. 143-150). John Benjamins. google scholar
  14. . (2007). Turkey. In M. Beller & J. Leerssen (Eds.), Imagology: The cultural construction and literary representation of national characters: A critical survey (pp.254-258). Radopi. google scholar
  15. . (2009). Reflections on the image of the Turk in Europe. Isis. google scholar
  16. Laurusaite, L. (2018). Imagology as image geology. In L. Laurusaite (Ed.), Imagology profiles: The dynamics of national imagery in literature (pp. 8-27). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. google scholar
  17. Leerssen, J. (2007). Imagology: History and method. In M. Beller & J. Leerssen (Eds.), Imagology: The cultural construction and literary representation of national character: A critical survey (pp. 17-32). Rodopi. google scholar
  18. Lefevere, A. (1992). Translation, rewriting and the manipulation of literary fame. Routledge. google scholar
  19. Mitsi, E. (2008). Lady Elizabeth Craven’s letters from Athens and the female picturesque. In V. Kolocotroni & E. google scholar
  20. Mitsi (Eds.), Women writing Greece: Hellenism, orientalism and travel (19-37). Rodopi. google scholar
  21. Montagu, L. M. W. (1994). The Turkish embassy letters. Virago Press. google scholar
  22. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books. google scholar
  23. Tahir Gürçağlar, Ş. (2008). The politics and poetics of translation in Turkey, 1923-1960. Rodopi. google scholar
  24. Taş, S. (2019). Bir yazar-çevirmenin çeviri seyahati. In S. Taş (Ed.), Çeviri üzerine gözlemler (Observations on translation) (pp. 57-89). Hiperlink Yayınları. google scholar
  25. Toury, G. (1995). Descriptive translation studies and beyond. John Benjamins Publishing Company. google scholar
  26. van Doorslaer, L. (2013). Translating, narrating and constructing images in journalism with a test case on representation in Flemish TV news. Meta, 57(4), 1046-1059. google scholar
  27. . (2019). Embedding imagology in translation studies (among others). Slovo.ru: baltijskij accent, 10(3), 56-68. google scholar
  28. van Doorslaer, L., Flynn, P. & Leerssen, J. (Eds), (2016). Interconnecting translation studies and imagology. John Benjamins. google scholar
  29. Winch, A. (2019). If female envy did not spoil everything in the world of women. Lies, rivalry, and reputation in Lady Elizabeth Craven’s travelogues. In C. B. Saunders (Ed.), Women, travel writing, and truth (pp. 91-108). Routledge. google scholar