Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi / 2018 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Microleakage of Three Different Retrograde Filling Materials in Apical Resection using an AutoCad Program

Apikal Rezeksiyonda Kullanılan Üç Farklı Retrograd Dolgu Malzemesinin Mikrosızıntısının AutoCad Programı ile Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
98–104
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: When used as a retrograde filling material, MTA and BD were significantly superior in terms of apical microleakage compared with GIC.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:INTRODUCTION: Endodontic treatments have a high success rate but endodontic surgery procedures may be necessary to preserve teeth when the treatments are unsuccessful.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: 70 human single-rooted permanent teeth were resected at 3 mm from the apex.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: When used as a retrograde filling material, MTA and BD were significantly superior in terms of apical microleakage compared with GIC.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endodontic treatments have a high success rate but endodontic surgery procedures may be necessary to preserve teeth when the treatments are unsuccessful. The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of glass ionomer cement (GIC), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA),and BiodentineTM (BD) in vitro. METHODS: 70 human single-rooted permanent teeth were resected at 3 mm from the apex. Root-end cavities were prepared using an ultrasonic tip and filled with GIC, MTA, or BD. All specimens were soaked in %2 methylene blue at 37°C for 48 hours. The 1-mm thick roots sections were digitally photographed under a stereomicroscope. With the use of an AutoCad program dye penetration area was calculated as the methylene blue-infiltrated surface divided by total dentin area. The Kruskal–Wallis H test and post-hoc multiple comparison test were used to determine which groups differed from each other (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The experimental groups presented different microleakage values varying between 0% and 95.45%. MTA and BD showed a statistically significant difference in microleakage compared with GIC, but no significant difference was obtained between MTA and BD. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: When used as a retrograde filling material, MTA and BD were significantly superior in terms of apical microleakage compared with GIC.

Özet

GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Endodontik tedaviler yüksek başarı oranına sahip olmakla birlikte, tedavilerin başarısız olduğu ve yenilenmesinin mümkün olmadığı vakalarda dişleri ağızda tutabilmek için cerrahi endodontik işlemler gerekebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada; Cam İyonomer Siman (CİS), Mineral Trioksit Agregate (MTA) ve Biodentine (BD)’in retrograd dolgu materyali olarak apikal sızdırmazlık direncinin in vitro koşullarda karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Çalışmada 70 adet tek köklü daimi insan dişi kök ucundan 3 mm kesildi. Kök ucu kaviteleri ultrasonik uç yardımıyla hazırlandıktan sonra CİS, MTA ve BD ile dolduruldu. Tüm örnekler %2'lik metilen mavisinde 48 saat 37°C’de bekletildi. 1 mm kalınlığındaki kök kesitleri stereomikroskop altında dijital olarak fotoğraflandı. Boya penetrasyon alanı, AutoCad programı kullanılarak metilen mavisi ile boyanan yüzeylerin tüm dentin yüzeyine oranlanması ile hesaplandı. Gruplar arasındaki farklılığı saptayabilmek için Kruskal-Wallis H ve çoklu karşılaştırma (post-hoc) testlerinden yararlanıldı (p<0,05). BULGULAR: Deney gruplarında % 0 ila % 95,45 arasında değişen derecelerde mikrosızıntının olduğu belirlendi. MTA ve BD gruplarının, CİS grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha az sızıntı gösterdiği ancak MTA ve Biodentine grubu arasında sızıntı açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadığı saptandı. TARTIŞMA ve SONUÇ: Bu in vitro çalışmada, retrograd dolgu materyali olarak MTA ve BD’nin apikal sızdırmazlık yeteneğinin CİS’e göre belirgin ölçüde üstün olduğu görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERBAŞAR, G. N. H., TULUMBACI, F., ERBAŞAR, R. C. (2018). Evaluation of Microleakage of Three Different Retrograde Filling Materials in Apical Resection using an AutoCad Program. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2, 98–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/152115

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Mandava P, Bolla N, Thumu J, Vemuri S, Chukka S. Microleakage evaluation around retrograde filling materials prepared using conventional and ultrasonic techniques. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: 43-6.
  2. Jain A, Ponnappa KC, Yadav P, Rao Y, Relhan N, Gupta P, Choubey A, Bhardwaj S. Comparison of the root end sealing ability of four different retrograde filling materials in teeth with root apices resected at different angles- An invitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10: 14-7. von Arx T. Apical surgery: A review of current techniques and outcome. Saudi Dent J 2011; 23: 9- 15. De Paolis G, Vincenti V, Prencipe M, Milana V, Plotino G. Ultrasonics in endodontic surgery: A review of the literature. Ann Stomatol 2010; 1: 6- 10. Aydemir S, Cimilli H, Hazar Yoruc AB, Kartal N. Evaluation of two different root-end cavity preparation techniques: A scanning electron microscope study. Eur J Dent 2013; 7: 186-90.
  3. Post LK, Lima FG, Xavier CB, Demarco FF, Gerhardt-Oliveira M. Sealing ability of MTA and amalgam in different root-end preparations and resection bevel angles: An in vitro evaluation using marginal dye leakage. Braz Dent J 2010; 21: 416-9.
  4. Ravichandra PV, Vemisetty H, Deepthi K, Jayaprada RS, Ramkiran D, Jaya Nagendra KM, Malathi G. Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation of Biodentine and other commonly used root end filling materials- An invitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: 243-5.
  5. Uzun I, Keskin C, Guler B. The sealing ability of novel Kryptonite adhesive bone cement as a retrograde filling material. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2016; 10: 189-93.
  6. Soundappan S, Sundaramurthy JL, Raghu S, Natanasabapathy V. Biodentine versus mineral trioxide aggregate versus intermediate restorative material for retrograde root end filling: An invitro study. J Dent 2014; 11: 143-9.
  7. Shahi S, Yavari HR, Rahimi S, Eskandarinezhad M, Shakouei S, Unchi M. Comparison of the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement used as root-end filling materials. J Oral Sci 2011; 53: 517-22.
  8. Bernabe PF, Gomes-Filho JE, Bernabé DG, Nery MJ, Otoboni-Filho JA, Dezan E Jr, Cintra LT. Sealing ability of MTA used as a root end filling material: Effect of the sonic and ultrasonic condensation. Braz Dent J 2013; 24: 107-10.
  9. Torabinejad M, Parirokh M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review- Part II: Leakage and biocompatibility investigations. J Endod 2010; 36: 190-202.
  10. Kokate SR, Pawar AM. An in vitro comparative stereomicroscopic evaluation of marg