SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi / 2019 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Different Mouthrinses on The Color Stability of Natural Teeth and Feldspathic Ceramic

Ağız Gargaralarının Diş Dokusu ve Feldspatik Seramik Restorasyonlarda Oluşturduğu Renk Değişikliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Akın ALADAĞ
Makbule Heval ŞAHAN
Rahime TÜZÜNSOY AKTAŞ
Niler ÖZDEMİR AKKUŞ
Pages
163–168
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In the study, it was concluded that the mouthrinses on ceramic surfaces caused different levels of coloration than the control group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 3 commercially available mouth rinses and distilled water as a control group on the color stability of dental ceramic and enamel.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Three group prescribed the use of 3 different mouthrinse and as a control group used distilled water.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In the study, it was concluded that the mouthrinses on ceramic surfaces caused different levels of coloration than the control group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 3 commercially available mouth rinses and distilled water as a control group on the color stability of dental ceramic and enamel. Methods: Eighty subjects were enrolled in this study and randomly divided into four groups. Three group prescribed the use of 3 different mouthrinse and as a control group used distilled water. Color values of dental ceramic and enamel were recorded at baseline with a spectrophotometer according to the CIE L*a*b* coordinates. After seven days, the color values of all subjects were re measured and the color change value ΔE* was calculated. Data were analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance at a significance level of.05. Results: There were no significant differences among color change of enamel. The difference between ΔE values obtained from different mouthwashes and feldspathic ceramic was not statistically significant. (P>.05). Conclusion: In the study, it was concluded that the mouthrinses on ceramic surfaces caused different levels of coloration than the control group.

Özet

Amaç: Sıklıkla kullanılan üç farklı ağız gargarasının ve kontol grubu olarak distile suyun kullanıldığı, doğal diş dokusunda ve feldispatik seramik yüzeyinde oluşturduğu renk değişikliklerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 80 hasta katıldı ve rastgele 4 gruba ayrıldı. 3 gruptaki hastaya farklı ağız gargaralarını kullanmaları, kontrol grubuna serum fizyolojik kullanması önerildi. Gargara kullanmaya başlamadan önce renk değerleri spektrofotometre kullanılarak ölçüldü. 7 gün sonra tüm hastalarda renk ölçümleri tekrarlandı. Ölçümler tamamlandıktan sonra ΔE* değerleri hesaplandı.Renk değişimlerinin istatistiksel analizi çift yönlü varyans analizi ile (Two-way ANOVA) α=.05 önem seviyesinde yapıldı. Bulgular: Test edilen gargaraların mine yüzeyinde oluşturduğu renklenme değerlerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı. Farklı ağız gargaralarının seramik yüzeyinde oluşturduğu renk değişikliklerinin ΔE değeri istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmadı (P>.05). Sonuç: Yapılan çalışmada, seramik yüzeylerde ağız gargaralarının kontrol grubuna göre farklı düzeylerde renklenmelere sebep olduğu sonucu elde edildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALADAĞ, A., ŞAHAN, M. H., AKTAŞ, R. T., AKKUŞ, N. Ö. (2019). Evaluation of Different Mouthrinses on The Color Stability of Natural Teeth and Feldspathic Ceramic. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3, 163–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/152109

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Khaledi AAR, Safari A, Adibi A, Adibi S. The effect of chlorhexidine mouth rinse on colour stability of porcelain with three different surface treatments: An in vitro study. J Dent Biomater 2014;1(1):3-8
  2. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of foodsimulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent, 2005; 33: 389-398
  3. Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, Meyer JM. Comparison of the color stability of ten newgeneration composites: an in vitro study. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 353- 362
  4. Gunsolley JC. A meta-analysis of six-month studies of antiplaque and antigingivitis agents. J Am Dent Assoc, 2006; 137(12): 1649-1657
  5. Tal H, Rosenberg M. Estimation of dental plaque levels and gingival inflammation using a simple oral rinse technique. J Periodontol 1990; 61(6): 339-42
  6. Van Steenberghe D, Avontroodt P, Peeters W et al. Effect of different mouthrinses on morning breath. Periodontol, 2001; 72(9): 1183-1191
  7. Gunsolley J. Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses. J Dent, 2010; 38: 6-10
  8. Ercan E, Özekinci T, Atakul F. Beş Farklı Ağız Gargarasının Antimikrobiyal Etkinliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv Diş Hekim Fak Derg 2004; 5 (3): 143-147
  9. Chu J, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent, 2010; 38: 2-16
  10. Brewer JD. Advances in color matching. Clin North Am, 2004; 48: 341-358
  11. Van Der Burgt TP, Ten Bosch JJ, Bors¬boom PCF, Plasschaert AJM. A New Method for Matching Tooth Colors with Color Standards. J Dent Res 1985; 64(5): 837-841
  12. Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hammenle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res 2002;81:578-82
  13. Chu SJ, Devigus A. Fundamentals of colors. Chicago: Quintessence publishing 2004
  14. Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, El-Zohainy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G. Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices. J Prosthod 2007;16:93-100
  15. Yuan K, Sun X, Wang F, Wang H, Chen JH. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of three computer-aided shade matching instruments. Oper Dent 2012;37:219-227
  16. Yu B, Ahn JS, Lee YK. Measurement of translucency of tooth enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:57-64
  17. Derdilopoulou FV, Zanter C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Evaluation of visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis: a clinical comparison of 3758 teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:414-416
  18. Kim-Pus