SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kariyer Psikolojik Danışmanlığı Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

İş Yaşamında Kabul ve Eylem Formu: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Gökçen Aydın(HASAN KALYONCU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0781-7817
Yasin Aydın(ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1783-2279
Nurten Karacan Özdemir(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2909-6857
Pages
32–54
Publication Date
2020-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cronbach alfa .84 olarak bulunmuştur.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bu çalışmanın amacı, İş Yaşamında Kabul ve Eylem Formu (İYKE)’nin (Work-related Acceptance and Action Questionnaire; WAAQ) (Bond, Lloyd ve Guenole, 2013) Türkçeye uyarlanarak geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarının yapılmasıdır.
📊
Key Findings & Data:İş yaşamında psikolojik esnekliğin ölçülmesi amacıyla geliştirilen WAAQ, 7’li Likert tipi yedi madde ve tek boyuttan oluşmaktadır.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cronbach alfa .84 olarak bulunmuştur.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İş yaşamında kabul ve eylem · psikolojik esneklik · geçerlik

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, İş Yaşamında Kabul ve Eylem Formu (İYKE)’nin (Work-related Acceptance and Action Questionnaire; WAAQ) (Bond, Lloyd ve Guenole, 2013) Türkçeye uyarlanarak geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarının yapılmasıdır. İş yaşamında psikolojik esnekliğin ölçülmesi amacıyla geliştirilen WAAQ, 7’li Likert tipi yedi madde ve tek boyuttan oluşmaktadır. Çeviri için gerekli süreçlerin tamamlanmasının ardından, açımlayıcı (AFA) ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya AFA için kamu ya da özel sektörde çalışan 91, DFA için 180 kişi katılmıştır. Ölçeğin Türkçe formunun AFA sonuçları tek boyutlu bir yapıyı göstermiş, DFA sonuçları da, mükemmel uyuma işaret ederek ölçeğin orijinalindeki tek faktörlü yapıyı doğrulamıştır. Cronbach alfa .84 olarak bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydın, G., Aydın, Y., Özdemir, N. K. (2020). İş Yaşamında Kabul ve Eylem Formu: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Kariyer Psikolojik Danışmanlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 32–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/1518217

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (44)

  1. Arthur, M. B. ve Rousseau, D. M. (1996). Introduction: the boundaryless career as a new employment principle. M. B. Arthur ve D. M. Rousseau (Eds.) içinde, The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era (ss. 3–20). New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Bond, F. W. ve Bunce, D. (2003). The role of acceptance and job control in mental health, job satisfaction, and work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1057–1067. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1057
  3. Bond, F.W. ve Flaxman, P. E. (2006). The ability of psychological flexibility and job control to predict learning, job performance, and mental health. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26, 113–130.
  4. Bond, F. W., Flaxman, P. E. ve Bunce, D. (2008). The influence of psychological flexibility on work redesign: Mediated moderation of a work reorganization intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 645–654. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.645
  5. Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K.,. & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior therapy, 42(4), 676-688. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007
  6. Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., ve Barnes- Holmes, D. (2006). Psychological flexibility, ACT and organizational behavior. S. C. Hayes, F. W. Bond, D. Barnes- Holmes & J. Austin (Eds) içinde. Acceptance and Mindfulness at Work: Applying Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Relational Frame Theory to Organizational Behavior Management (ss. 25-54). Binghampton, NY: the Haworth Press.
  7. Bond, F. W., Lloyd, J., Flaxman, P. E. ve Archer, R. (2015). Psychological Flexibility and ACT at Work. The Wiley Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science, 459-482. doi:10.1002/9781118489857.ch22
  8. Bond, F. W., Lloyd, J. ve Guenole, N. (2013). The Work‐related Acceptance and Action Questionnaire: Initial psychometric findings and their implications for measuring psychological flexibility in specific contexts. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 331–347. doi:10.1111/joop.12001
  9. Brinkborg, H., Michanek, J., Hesser, H. ve Berglund, G. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy for the treatment of stress among social workers: A randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 389-398. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2011.03.009
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012, Mayıs). Örnekleme yöntemleri. http://w3.balikesir.edu.tr/~msackes/wp/wpcontent/uploads/2012/03/BAY-Final-Konulari.pdf adresinden erişildi
  11. Chan, S. H., Mai, X., Kuok, O. M. ve Kong, S. H. (2016). The influence of satisfaction and promotability on the relation between career adaptability and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 167-175. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2015.12.003
  12. Chawla, N., ve Ostafin, B. (2007). Experiential avoidance as a functional dimensional approach to psychopathology: An empirical review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(9), 871-890. doi:10.1002/jclp.20400
  13. Darnley, R., DiPlacido, M., Kerns, M. ve Kim, A. (2018). Industry 4.0: Digitization in Danish industry (Doktora tezi), Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
  14. Deval, C., Bernard-Curie, S., ve Monestès, J. L. (2017). Effects of an acceptance and commitment therapy intervention on leaders’ and managers’ psychological flexibility. Journal de Therapie Comportementale et Cognitive, 27(1), 34-42. doi:10.1016/j.jtcc.2016.10.002
  15. Donaldson-Feilder, E. J. ve Bond, F. W. (2004). The relative importance of psychological acceptance and emotional intelligence to workplace well-being. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling. 32(2), 187-203. doi:10.1080/08069880410001692210
  16. Finney, S. J. & Distefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Muller. Structural equation modeling: A second course (p. 269-314). Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.
  17. Flaxman, P. E. ve Bond, F. W. (2010a). Worksite stress management training: Moderated effects and clinical significance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 347–358. doi:10.1037/a0020522
  18. Flaxman, P. E. ve Bond, F. W. (2010b). A randomized worksite comparison of acceptance and commitment therapy and stress inoculation training. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(8), 816-20. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.05.004
  19. Gysberg, N. C. ve Lapan, R. T. (2001). The implementation and evaluation of comprehensive school guidance programs in the United States: Progress and prospects. Internat. Jnl. for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 1, 197–208. doi:10.1023/A:1012297314669
  20. Henderson M., Glozier N. ve Elliott, H. K. (2005). Long term sickness absence. BMJ, 330, 802–803. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7495.802
  21. Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R., Roget, N., Padilla, M., Kohlenberg, B. S., Fisher, G., Masuda, A., Pistorello, J., Rye, A. K., Berry, K. ve Niccolls, R. (2004). The impact of acceptance and commitment training and multicultural training on the stigmatizing attitudes and professional burnout of substance abuse counselors. Behavior Therapy, 35, 821–835. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80022-4
  22. Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J., Bond, F., Masuda, A. ve Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes, and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1-25. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
  23. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. New York: Guilford Press.
  24. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., vd., (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. Psychological Record, 54, 553-578. doi:10.1007/BF03395492
  25. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  26. Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2018). Kariyer uyum yeteneğinin çalışanların iş performansına etkisi. (Yayımlanmamış Yükseklisans Tezi). Bartın Üniversitesi, Bartın.
  27. Kashdan, T. B. ve Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 467– 480. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001
  28. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Assumptions+in+Structural+Equation+Modeling#4
  29. Lloyd, J., Bond, F. W. ve Flaxman, P. E. (2013). The value of psychological flexibility: Examining psychological mechanisms underpinning a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for burnout. Work and Stress, 27, 181–199. doi:10.1080/02678373.2013.782157
  30. Mesleki Yeterlik Kurumu; MYK (2017). Ulusal meslek standardı, okul psikolojik danışmanı [National Occupational Standards, School Counselor]. T.C. Resmi Gazete, 30227.
  31. Öztemel, E. (2018). Eğitimde yeni yönelimlerin değerlendirilmesi ve eğitim 4.0. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 25-30. doi:10.32329/uad.382041
  32. Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  33. Robertson, I., Cooper, C. L., Sarkar, M. ve Curran, T. (2015). Resilience training in the workplace from 2003-2014: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 533-562. doi:10.1111/joop.12120
  34. Rudolph, C. W., Lavigne, K. N. ve Zacher, H. (2017). Career adaptability: A meta-analysis of relationships with measures of adaptivity, adapting responses, and adaptation results. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 17-34. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.09.002
  35. Ruiz Jiménez, F. J., ve Odriozola González, P. (2014). The Spanish version of the Work-related Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (WAAQ). Psicothema, 26(1), 63-8. doi:10.7334/psicothema2013.110
  36. Sarkar, M. ve Fletcher, D. (2017). How resilience training can enhance wellbeing and performance. M. F. Crane (Ed.) içinde, Managing for resilience: A practical guide for employee wellbeing and organizational performance (ss. 227-237). London, UK: Routledge.
  37. Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. S. D. Brown ve R. W. Lent (Eds.) içinde, Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (ss. 42–70). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  38. Savickas, M. L. (2012). Life design: A paradigm for career intervention in the 21st century. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90(1), 13-19. doi:10.1111/j.1556- 6676.2012. 00002.x
  39. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginners guide to structural equation modeling. New York: Routledge.
  40. Schweden, T. L. K., Wolfradt, U., Jahnke, S., & Hoyer, J. (2018). Depersonalization under academic stress: Frequency, predictors, and consequences. Psychopathology, 51(4), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1159/000489468
  41. Tabachnick, B. G., ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education. Boston: Pearson Education. doi:10.1037/022267
  42. Vanhove, A. J., Herian, M., Perez, A. L. U., Harms, P. D. ve Lester, P. B. (2016). Can resilience be developed at work? A meta-analytic review of resilience-building programme effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 278-307. doi:10.1111/joop.12123
  43. Xu, X., Liu, X., Ou, M., Xie, C., ve Chen, Y. (2018). Psychological flexibility of nurses in a cancer hospital: Preliminary validation of a Chinese version of the Work-related Acceptance and Action Questionnaire. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 5(1), 83–90. doi:10.4103/apjon.apjon_62_17
  44. Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K.,. & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior therapy, 42(4), 676-688. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007